Suppr超能文献

医疗保健研究人员中的导师制:一项社会网络分析。

Mentorship among healthcare researchers: a social network analysis.

作者信息

Kim Bo, Pleasants Erin A, Sullivan Jennifer L, Linsky Amy M

机构信息

Center for Health Optimization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA, United States.

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

Front Health Serv. 2025 Jul 17;5:1514379. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1514379. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Mentorship is an active workplace relationship between a mentor and a mentee, aimed at mutual career advancement, which is vital for both employee growth and organizational success. To improve their mentorship structures and processes, organizations must first assess their current practices. Thus, we developed and conducted a cross-sectional survey to evaluate mentorship among employees at a two-site federally funded health services research center.

METHODS

We surveyed Center investigators and other employees (henceforth "staff"), gathering data on mentors, mentees, mentoring relationships, and satisfaction with the Center's mentoring infrastructure. We used social network analysis to examine both formal and informal mentoring relationships and assessed the association of employee connectedness in these networks with reported satisfaction.

RESULTS

There were 120 respondents (62.2% response rate). A greater percentage of investigators, compared to staff, had at least one formal mentor (55.8% vs. 25.0%) and one formal mentee (57.7% vs. 10.3%), and investigators had more informal mentors within the Center than staff (4.94 vs. 3.59,  = 0.0485). Investigators reported higher satisfaction with mentorship compared to staff (6.63 vs. 5.25,  = 0.002) and had more formal mentoring relationships with other investigators than staff had with other staff (0.06 vs. 0.01 degree centrality,  < 0.0001). Combining formal and informal mentorship across both investigators and staff, compared to formal mentorship alone, showed fewer degrees of separation (1.32 vs. 3.41 mean distance,  < 0.0001). For the combined formal and informal mentorship network across both investigators and staff, satisfaction with mentoring was associated with having more connections with network members who were connected with each other ( = 0.998,  < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

To foster connections among employees, research organizations may create opportunities for open communication and collaborative problem-solving. Our survey and findings are timely given the growing emphasis on mentorship's importance for successful careers, motivated employees, and workplace productivity.

摘要

引言

导师指导是导师与学员之间一种积极的职场关系,旨在促进双方职业发展,这对员工成长和组织成功都至关重要。为了改进其导师指导架构和流程,组织必须首先评估其当前做法。因此,我们开展了一项横断面调查,以评估一个由联邦政府资助的两地健康服务研究中心员工之间的导师指导情况。

方法

我们对该中心的研究人员和其他员工(以下简称“工作人员”)进行了调查,收集有关导师、学员、导师指导关系以及对该中心导师指导架构满意度的数据。我们使用社会网络分析来研究正式和非正式的导师指导关系,并评估这些网络中员工的联系程度与报告的满意度之间的关联。

结果

共有120名受访者(回复率为62.2%)。与工作人员相比,研究人员中拥有至少一位正式导师(55.8%对25.0%)和一位正式学员(57.7%对10.3%)的比例更高,并且研究人员在中心内部拥有的非正式导师比工作人员更多(4.94对3.59,P = 0.0485)。与工作人员相比,研究人员对导师指导的满意度更高(6.63对5.25,P = 0.002),并且与其他研究人员的正式导师指导关系比工作人员与其他工作人员之间的关系更多(中心度为0.06对0.01,P < 0.0001)。将研究人员和工作人员的正式和非正式导师指导结合起来,与仅考虑正式导师指导相比,显示出更少的分隔度(平均距离为1.32对3.41,P < 0.0001)。对于研究人员和工作人员的正式和非正式导师指导网络的组合,对导师指导的满意度与与彼此有联系的网络成员有更多联系相关(r = 0.998,P < 0.0001)。

讨论

为了促进员工之间的联系,研究机构可以创造开放沟通和协作解决问题的机会。鉴于越来越强调导师指导对成功职业、积极员工和职场生产力的重要性,我们的调查和结果很及时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b79d/12310661/7d89e8313801/frhs-05-1514379-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验