• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑脓肿患者抗癫痫药物的起始治疗

Initiation of Antiseizure Medications in Patients With Brain Abscess.

作者信息

Nielsen Victoria M, Klompas Michael, Manjourides Justin, Smith Louisa H

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2524557. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24557.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24557
PMID:40748638
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12317356/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Epilepsy is a common complication of brain abscess. However, the effectiveness of antiseizure medications (ASMs) in preventing epilepsy in brain abscess survivors is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the initiation of ASMs is associated with a reduced risk of epilepsy.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study conducted a target trial emulation using US commercial insurance claims data from October 1, 2016, to June 30, 2022, and followed up patients for 180 days. The study population was restricted to those with a diagnosis of brain abscess using International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes associated with an acute care visit. Only patients aged 18 years or older at the time of the brain abscess with at least 1 year of prior enrollment were included. Statistical analysis was performed from May to December 2024.

EXPOSURE

A priori selected study ASMs were levetiracetam, valproate, and phenytoin. A clone-censor-weight approach was used to compare the initiation of ASMs within a 45-day grace period (treatment arm) with no initiation of ASMs (control arm). Inverse probability weights were used to control for treatment selection.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Study outcome was a diagnosis of epilepsy or seizure (with ICD-10-CM code) occurring 15 days or more after the index date. Weighted Kaplan-Meier models were fitted to estimate risk differences (RDs) at 90, 135, and 180 days accompanied by nonparametric bootstrapped 95% CIs. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess internal threats to validity.

RESULTS

Among the 572 patients included, the mean (SD) age was 61.5 (16.6) years and 353 (61.7%) were male. Of those in the treatment arm, 83 (88.3%) initiated ASMs within the first 30 days. Overall, 129 patients (22.5%) developed epilepsy during follow-up. There was no statistically significant risk difference in the probability of epilepsy incidence at each follow-up time point (RD at 90 days, -0.02% [95% CI, -4.9% to 4.8%]; RD at 135 days, 1.9% [95% CI, -5.0% to 8.5%]; RD at 180 days, 3.5% [95% CI, -4.4% to 10.8%]). Sensitivity analyses agreed with the primary findings.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study of brain abscess survivors, initiation of ASMs was not associated with a reduced risk of epilepsy. Future studies should replicate the findings and consider alternative treatment protocols.

摘要

重要性

癫痫是脑脓肿的常见并发症。然而,抗癫痫药物(ASMs)在预防脑脓肿幸存者癫痫发作方面的有效性尚不清楚。

目的

评估启动ASMs是否与降低癫痫风险相关。

设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究使用2016年10月1日至2022年6月30日的美国商业保险理赔数据进行目标试验模拟,并对患者进行了180天的随访。研究人群仅限于那些使用与急性护理就诊相关的国际疾病分类第十版临床修订本(ICD-10-CM)编码诊断为脑脓肿的患者。仅纳入脑脓肿发生时年龄在18岁及以上且至少提前1年入组的患者。统计分析于2024年5月至12月进行。

暴露因素

预先选定的研究ASMs为左乙拉西坦、丙戊酸盐和苯妥英钠。采用克隆审查权重法比较45天宽限期内启动ASMs的患者(治疗组)与未启动ASMs的患者(对照组)。使用逆概率权重来控制治疗选择。

主要结局和测量指标

研究结局为在索引日期后15天或更长时间发生的癫痫或癫痫发作诊断(使用ICD-10-CM编码)。拟合加权Kaplan-Meier模型以估计90天、135天和180天时的风险差异(RDs),并伴有非参数自举95%置信区间。进行敏感性分析以评估内部有效性威胁。

结果

在纳入的572例患者中,平均(标准差)年龄为61.5(16.6)岁,353例(61.7%)为男性。在治疗组中,83例(88.3%)在头30天内启动了ASMs。总体而言,129例患者(22.5%)在随访期间发生了癫痫。在每个随访时间点,癫痫发病率的概率没有统计学上的显著风险差异(90天时的RD为-0.02%[95%置信区间,-4.9%至4.8%];135天时的RD为1.9%[95%置信区间,-5.0%至8.5%];180天时的RD为3.5%[95%置信区间,-4.4%至10.8%])。敏感性分析与主要发现一致。

结论和相关性

在这项针对脑脓肿幸存者的队列研究中,启动ASMs与降低癫痫风险无关。未来的研究应重复这些发现并考虑替代治疗方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd14/12317356/2e4c2ac34728/jamanetwopen-e2524557-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd14/12317356/2e4c2ac34728/jamanetwopen-e2524557-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd14/12317356/2e4c2ac34728/jamanetwopen-e2524557-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Initiation of Antiseizure Medications in Patients With Brain Abscess.脑脓肿患者抗癫痫药物的起始治疗
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2524557. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24557.
2
Monotherapy treatment of epilepsy in pregnancy: congenital malformation outcomes in the child.妊娠期癫痫的单药治疗:对子代先天畸形的结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 29;8(8):CD010224. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010224.pub3.
3
Pharmacological treatments for preventing epilepsy following traumatic head injury.创伤性脑损伤后预防癫痫的药物治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 10;2015(8):CD009900. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009900.pub2.
4
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub3.
5
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 29;6(6):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub2.
6
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
7
Anti-seizure medications for neonates with seizures.抗癫痫药物治疗新生儿癫痫。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 24;10(10):CD014967. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014967.pub2.
8
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯妥英钠单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 27;2(2):CD001911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001911.pub3.
9
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯妥英单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 14(8):CD001911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001911.pub2.
10
Levetiracetam add-on for drug-resistant focal epilepsy: an updated Cochrane Review.左乙拉西坦添加治疗耐药性局灶性癫痫:Cochrane系统评价的更新版
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;2012(9):CD001901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001901.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
OHDSI Standardized Vocabularies-a large-scale centralized reference ontology for international data harmonization.OHDSI 标准化词汇表-用于国际数据协调的大规模集中参考本体。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Feb 16;31(3):583-590. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad247.
2
European society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases guidelines on diagnosis and treatment of brain abscess in children and adults.欧洲临床微生物学和传染病学会关于儿童和成人脑脓肿的诊断和治疗指南。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024 Jan;30(1):66-89. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.016. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
3
Risk Factors and Prognosis of Epilepsy Following Brain Abscess: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.
脑脓肿后癫痫的风险因素和预后:一项全国基于人群的队列研究。
Neurology. 2023 Apr 11;100(15):e1611-e1620. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000206866. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
4
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Seizure Prophylaxis Among Adults After Acute Ischemic Stroke.成人急性缺血性脑卒中后预防癫痫发作的疗效和安全性比较。
Stroke. 2023 Feb;54(2):527-536. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039946. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
Brain Abscess and Risk of Cancer: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.脑脓肿与癌症风险:一项全国性基于人群的队列研究。
Neurology. 2022 Aug 23;99(8):e835-e842. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200769. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
6
Multisite medical record review of emergency department visits for unspecified injury of head following the ICD-10-CM coding transition.多站点医疗记录回顾:ICD-10-CM 编码转换后,头部未特指损伤的急诊科就诊情况。
Inj Prev. 2021 Mar;27(S1):i13-i18. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043517.
7
Epilepsy Prevention After Brain Abscess: Is It Time to Rethink the Indication?脑脓肿后的癫痫预防:是时候重新审视适应证了吗?
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):939. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab163.
8
Key considerations when using health insurance claims data in advanced data analyses: an experience report.在高级数据分析中使用健康保险理赔数据时的关键考量因素:一份经验报告。
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2019 Mar 1;9(4):317-325. doi: 10.1080/20476965.2019.1581433.
9
Epilepsy after brain infection in adults: A register-based population-wide study.成人脑感染后癫痫:一项基于登记的全人群研究。
Neurology. 2020 Dec 15;95(24):e3213-e3220. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010954. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
10
Reflection on modern methods: trial emulation in the presence of immortal-time bias. Assessing the benefit of major surgery for elderly lung cancer patients using observational data.对现代方法的思考:存在不朽时间偏倚时的试验模拟。利用观察性数据评估老年肺癌患者接受大手术的获益。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Oct 1;49(5):1719-1729. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa057.