• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

OHDSI 标准化词汇表-用于国际数据协调的大规模集中参考本体。

OHDSI Standardized Vocabularies-a large-scale centralized reference ontology for international data harmonization.

机构信息

Coordinating Center, Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics, New York City NY 10032, United States.

OHDSI Center at the Roux Institute, Northeastern University, Portland ME 04101, United States.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Feb 16;31(3):583-590. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad247.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocad247
PMID:38175665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10873827/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) is the largest distributed data network in the world encompassing more than 331 data sources with 2.1 billion patient records across 34 countries. It enables large-scale observational research through standardizing the data into a common data model (CDM) (Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership [OMOP] CDM) and requires a comprehensive, efficient, and reliable ontology system to support data harmonization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We created the OHDSI Standardized Vocabularies-a common reference ontology mandatory to all data sites in the network. It comprises imported and de novo-generated ontologies containing concepts and relationships between them, and the praxis of converting the source data to the OMOP CDM based on these. It enables harmonization through assigned domains according to clinical categories, comprehensive coverage of entities within each domain, support for commonly used international coding schemes, and standardization of semantically equivalent concepts.

RESULTS

The OHDSI Standardized Vocabularies comprise over 10 million concepts from 136 vocabularies. They are used by hundreds of groups and several large data networks. More than 8600 users have performed 50 000 downloads of the system. This open-source resource has proven to address an impediment of large-scale observational research-the dependence on the context of source data representation. With that, it has enabled efficient phenotyping, covariate construction, patient-level prediction, population-level estimation, and standard reporting.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

OHDSI has made available a comprehensive, open vocabulary system that is unmatched in its ability to support global observational research. We encourage researchers to exploit it and contribute their use cases to this dynamic resource.

摘要

重要性

观察性健康数据科学和信息学(OHDSI)是世界上最大的分布式数据网络,包含来自 34 个国家的 331 多个数据源,涵盖 21 亿患者记录。它通过将数据标准化为通用数据模型(CDM)(观察性医疗结局伙伴关系 [OMOP] CDM),实现了大规模的观察性研究,并需要一个全面、高效和可靠的本体系统来支持数据协调。

材料和方法

我们创建了 OHDSI 标准化词汇表,这是网络中所有数据站点都必须使用的通用参考本体。它包含导入和从头生成的本体,其中包含概念及其之间的关系,以及根据这些概念将源数据转换为 OMOP CDM 的实践。它通过根据临床类别分配域、全面涵盖每个域内的实体、支持常用国际编码方案以及标准化语义等效概念来实现协调。

结果

OHDSI 标准化词汇表包含来自 136 个词汇表的超过 1000 万个概念。它被数百个团体和几个大型数据网络使用。超过 8600 名用户已经执行了 50000 次系统下载。这个开源资源已经证明解决了大规模观察性研究的一个障碍——对源数据表示上下文的依赖。有了它,就能够实现高效的表型分析、协变量构建、患者水平预测、人群水平估计和标准报告。

讨论和结论

OHDSI 提供了一个全面的、开放的词汇系统,在支持全球观察性研究方面能力无与伦比。我们鼓励研究人员利用它,并将他们的用例贡献给这个动态资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd82/10873827/8e9c02c57349/ocad247f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd82/10873827/f355b63dcb4d/ocad247f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd82/10873827/35364d7784a7/ocad247f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd82/10873827/8e9c02c57349/ocad247f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd82/10873827/f355b63dcb4d/ocad247f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd82/10873827/35364d7784a7/ocad247f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd82/10873827/8e9c02c57349/ocad247f3.jpg

相似文献

1
OHDSI Standardized Vocabularies-a large-scale centralized reference ontology for international data harmonization.OHDSI 标准化词汇表-用于国际数据协调的大规模集中参考本体。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Feb 16;31(3):583-590. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad247.
2
Assessing the Use of German Claims Data Vocabularies for Research in the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model: Development and Evaluation Study.评估德国索赔数据词汇表在观察性医疗结局合作组织通用数据模型研究中的应用:开发与评估研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Nov 7;11:e47959. doi: 10.2196/47959.
3
Transforming Anesthesia Data Into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model: Development and Usability Study.将麻醉数据转化为观察性医疗结局伙伴关系通用数据模型:开发和可用性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 29;23(10):e29259. doi: 10.2196/29259.
4
Conceptual design of a generic data harmonization process for OMOP common data model.通用数据协调流程的概念设计,适用于 OMOP 通用数据模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02458-7.
5
OMOP CDM Can Facilitate Data-Driven Studies for Cancer Prediction: A Systematic Review.OMOP CDM 有助于癌症预测的数据分析研究:系统综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 5;23(19):11834. doi: 10.3390/ijms231911834.
6
Transforming Primary Care Data Into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model: Development and Usability Study.将初级保健数据转化为观察性医疗结果合作组织通用数据模型:开发与可用性研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Aug 13;12:e49542. doi: 10.2196/49542.
7
The OMOP common data model in Australian primary care data: Building a quality research ready harmonised dataset.澳大利亚初级保健数据中的 OMOP 通用数据模型:构建一个高质量、可用于研究的协调数据集。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0301557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301557. eCollection 2024.
8
Preliminary exploration of survival analysis using the OHDSI common data model: a case study of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.应用 OHDSI 通用数据模型进行生存分析的初步探索:以肝内胆管癌为例。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Dec 7;18(Suppl 5):116. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0686-7.
9
INSPIRE datahub: a pan-African integrated suite of services for harmonising longitudinal population health data using OHDSI tools.INSPIRE数据中心:一个使用OHDSI工具协调纵向人群健康数据的泛非综合服务套件。
Front Digit Health. 2024 Jan 29;6:1329630. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1329630. eCollection 2024.
10
German Claims Data for Real-World Research: Content Coverage Evaluation in OMOP CDM.德国真实世界研究的索赔数据:在 OMOP CDM 中的内容覆盖评估。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2023 May 18;302:3-7. doi: 10.3233/SHTI230053.

引用本文的文献

1
SEA CDM: Study-Experiment-Assay Common Data Model and Databases for Cross-Domain Data Integration and Analysis.SEA CDM:用于跨域数据集成与分析的研究-实验-检测通用数据模型及数据库
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 28:2025.08.26.671804. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.26.671804.
2
Aioli: Standardising Drugs in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to RxNorm and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Codes.蒜泥蛋黄酱:将美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中的药品标准化为RxNorm和解剖学治疗学化学(ATC)代码。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2025 Sep;34(9):e70216. doi: 10.1002/pds.70216.
3
Mapping between clinical and preclinical terminologies: eTRANSAFE's Rosetta stone approach.

本文引用的文献

1
Large-scale evidence generation and evaluation across a network of databases for type 2 diabetes mellitus (LEGEND-T2DM): a protocol for a series of multinational, real-world comparative cardiovascular effectiveness and safety studies.大规模证据生成和评估网络数据库中的 2 型糖尿病(LEGEND-T2DM):一系列跨国真实世界比较心血管有效性和安全性研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 9;12(6):e057977. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057977.
2
Unraveling COVID-19: A Large-Scale Characterization of 4.5 Million COVID-19 Cases Using CHARYBDIS.解析新冠病毒:使用CHARYBDIS对450万例新冠病例进行大规模特征分析。
Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Mar 22;14:369-384. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S323292. eCollection 2022.
3
临床术语与临床前术语之间的映射:eTRANSAFE的罗塞塔石碑方法。
J Biomed Semantics. 2025 Aug 21;16(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13326-025-00337-2.
4
Deep Phenotyping of Obesity: Electronic Health Record-Based Temporal Modeling Study.肥胖的深度表型分析:基于电子健康记录的时间建模研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 20;27:e70140. doi: 10.2196/70140.
5
VO: The Vaccine Ontology.VO:疫苗本体论。
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 15:2025.08.12.669998. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.12.669998.
6
Mapping and Harmonization of CVX vaccine terms to the Vaccine Ontology.将CVX疫苗术语映射并协调至疫苗本体论。
bioRxiv. 2025 Jul 18:2025.07.15.664501. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.15.664501.
7
Advancing Real-World Evidence Through a Federated Health Data Network (EHDEN): Descriptive Study.通过联合健康数据网络(EHDEN)推进真实世界证据:描述性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 7;27:e74119. doi: 10.2196/74119.
8
Initiation of Antiseizure Medications in Patients With Brain Abscess.脑脓肿患者抗癫痫药物的起始治疗
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2524557. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.24557.
9
Unlocking efficiency in real-world collaborative studies: a multi-site international study with one-shot lossless GLMM algorithm.在实际协作研究中提高效率:一项采用一次性无损广义线性混合模型算法的多中心国际研究。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 19;8(1):457. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01846-1.
10
Assessing the Data Quality Dimensions of Surgical Oncology Cohorts in the Research Program.评估研究项目中外科肿瘤学队列的数据质量维度。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2025 Jul;9:e2500078. doi: 10.1200/CCI-25-00078. Epub 2025 Jul 8.
The Unified Medical Language System at 30 Years and How It Is Used and Published: Systematic Review and Content Analysis.
统一医学语言系统30年回顾及其应用与发布情况:系统评价与内容分析
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Aug 27;9(8):e20675. doi: 10.2196/20675.
4
Characterizing database granularity using SNOMED-CT hierarchy.使用 SNOMED-CT 层次结构进行数据库粒度描述。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:983-992. eCollection 2020.
5
Comprehensive Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of First-Line β-Blocker Monotherapy in Hypertensive Patients: A Large-Scale Multicenter Observational Study.一线β受体阻滞剂单药治疗高血压患者的综合疗效和安全性比较:一项大规模多中心观察性研究。
Hypertension. 2021 May 5;77(5):1528-1538. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16402. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
6
Extending the OMOP Common Data Model and Standardized Vocabularies to Support Observational Cancer Research.扩展OMOP通用数据模型和标准化词汇表以支持观察性癌症研究。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Jan;5:12-20. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00079.
7
Deep phenotyping of 34,128 adult patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in an international network study.在一项国际网络研究中,对 34128 名因 COVID-19 住院的成年患者进行深度表型分析。
Nat Commun. 2020 Oct 6;11(1):5009. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18849-z.
8
Large-scale evidence generation and evaluation across a network of databases (LEGEND): assessing validity using hypertension as a case study.大规模证据生成与评估网络数据库(LEGEND):以高血压为案例研究评估其有效性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Aug 1;27(8):1268-1277. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa124.
9
The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C): Rationale, design, infrastructure, and deployment.国家 COVID 队列协作组织(N3C):原理、设计、基础设施和部署。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Mar 1;28(3):427-443. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa196.
10
Development and validation of phenotype classifiers across multiple sites in the observational health data sciences and informatics network.在观察性健康数据科学和信息学网络的多个站点开发和验证表型分类器。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jun 1;27(6):877-883. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa032.