科学通过不断自我质疑而变得值得信赖。
Science becomes trustworthy by constantly questioning itself.
作者信息
Nosek Brian A
机构信息
Center for Open Science, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.
出版信息
PLoS Biol. 2025 Aug 1;23(8):e3003334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003334. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Abstract
What happens when the greatest strengths of science-openness, humility, self-criticism, and self-correction-are exploited for political gain? Scientists affirm the genuine application of those strengths as the source of its trustworthiness.
摘要
当科学的最大优势——开放性、谦逊、自我批评和自我修正——被用于政治目的时会发生什么？科学家们肯定，真正运用这些优势是科学可信度的来源。
相似文献
1
Science becomes trustworthy by constantly questioning itself.科学通过不断自我质疑而变得值得信赖。
PLoS Biol. 2025 Aug 1;23(8):e3003334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3003334. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
A Pilot Study of Political Experiences and Barriers to Voting Among Autistic Adults Participating in Online Survey Research in the United States.一项针对参与美国在线调查研究的成年自闭症患者的政治经历和投票障碍的试点研究。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):261-272. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0119. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Trust, Trustworthiness, and the Future of Medical AI: Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Expert Workshop.信任、可信度与医学人工智能的未来：跨学科专家研讨会成果
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 2;27:e71236. doi: 10.2196/71236.
4
The importance of scientists' intellectual humility for communicating effectively across ideological and identity-based divides.科学家的智识谦逊对于跨越意识形态和基于身份的分歧进行有效沟通的重要性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 8;122(27):e2400930121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2400930121. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
5
Making expert advice public in a time of emergency: Independent SAGE and the contestation of science during the Covid pandemic in the UK.在紧急情况下公开专家建议：英国独立科学咨询小组与新冠疫情期间的科学争议
Soc Stud Sci. 2025 Aug;55(4):512-541. doi: 10.1177/03063127241309071. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
6
Effects of intellectual humility in the context of affective polarization: Approaching and avoiding others in controversial political discussions.情感极化背景下智识谦逊的影响：在有争议的政治讨论中接近和回避他人。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2024 May 13. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000462.
7
Investigating the trustworthiness of randomized controlled trials in osteopathic research: a systematic review with meta-analysis.整骨疗法研究中随机对照试验的可信度调查：一项荟萃分析的系统评价
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jul;183:111788. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111788. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
9
Journals Operating Predatory Practices Are Systematically Eroding the Science Ethos: A Gate and Code Strategy to Minimise Their Operating Space and Restore Research Best Practice.采用掠夺性做法的期刊正在系统性地侵蚀科学精神：一种减少其运营空间并恢复研究最佳实践的把关与编码策略。
Microb Biotechnol. 2025 Jun;18(6):e70180. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.70180.
10
The Role of the Amygdala in Facial Trustworthiness Processing: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of fMRI Studies.杏仁核在面部可信度加工中的作用：功能磁共振成像研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 29;11(11):e0167276. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167276. eCollection 2016.
本文引用的文献
1
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
2
The preregistration revolution.预注册革命。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Mar 13;115(11):2600-2606. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1708274114.
3
Scientists' Reputations Are Based on Getting It Right, Not Being Right.科学家的声誉建立在做对事情上，而非一贯正确。
PLoS Biol. 2016 May 12;14(5):e1002460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002460. eCollection 2016 May.
4
SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research culture.科学标准。促进开放的研究文化。
Science. 2015 Jun 26;348(6242):1422-5. doi: 10.1126/science.aab2374.
5
Data sharing by scientists: practices and perceptions.科学家的数据共享：实践与看法。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021101. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
Zotero 插件