Trémeaux Pauline, Latour Justine, Vellas Camille, Demmou Sofia, Ranger Noémie, Bal Antonin, Izopet Jacques
Virology Laboratory, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.
Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (INFINITy), INSERM UMR 1391 - CNRS UMR 5051 - University of Toulouse III, Toulouse, France.
J Med Virol. 2025 Aug;97(8):e70539. doi: 10.1002/jmv.70539.
Due to the continuous genetic evolution of SARS-CoV-2, numerous variants have emerged and different whole genome sequencing techniques, necessary for accurate virus typing, have been developed. In this study, we evaluated the performance of PacBio single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing for SARS-CoV-2 typing. Reproducibility was assessed on two internal quality controls, whose median reading depths were 1154X and 1059X. The overall sensitivity on 1646 clinical samples collected between January 2023 and June 2024 was 83.6% and was correlated to the viral load. By comparison, the overall sensitivity of short-read illumina sequencing over the same period of time on 271 samples was 90.8%. Although less sensitive, SMRT sequencing was more efficient for the identification of the two lineages in a co-infection case due to the amplification of long fragments. Comparing the results obtained by the two techniques, 10 out of 50 samples were identified with the same clade but not the exact same lineage at the time of analysis, because of the very frequent updates of the Pango taxonomy. Nevertheless, we obtained very similar fasta consensus sequences with a maximum difference of 4 nucleotides, showing that both methods provide accurate typing of SARS-CoV-2, useful for epidemiological or clinical studies.
由于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的持续基因进化,出现了许多变种,并且已经开发出了准确病毒分型所需的不同全基因组测序技术。在本研究中,我们评估了PacBio单分子实时(SMRT)测序用于SARS-CoV-2分型的性能。在两个内部质量控制样本上评估了可重复性,其平均读长深度分别为1154X和1059X。对2023年1月至2024年6月期间收集的1646份临床样本的总体灵敏度为83.6%,且与病毒载量相关。相比之下,同期对271份样本进行的短读长Illumina测序的总体灵敏度为90.8%。虽然灵敏度较低,但由于长片段的扩增,SMRT测序在共感染病例中对两个谱系的鉴定更有效。比较两种技术获得的结果,在分析时,50份样本中有10份被鉴定为同一进化枝,但不是完全相同的谱系,这是因为Pango分类法更新非常频繁。然而,我们获得了非常相似的fasta一致序列,最大差异为4个核苷酸,表明两种方法都能提供准确的SARS-CoV-2分型,对流行病学或临床研究有用。