Paterson Amy, Kabajaasi Olive, Adlard Francess, Dimitrios Kkunsa Hadson, Cheyne Ashleigh, Ssewankambo Yasin, Kaggwa David, Olliaro Piero, Kenya-Mugisha Nathan, Rojek Amanda
Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Walimu, Kampala, Uganda.
Trop Med Int Health. 2025 Sep;30(9):1006-1017. doi: 10.1111/tmi.70014. Epub 2025 Aug 3.
The 2022 outbreak of Sudan ebolavirus in central Uganda was the country's largest in two decades. It was accompanied by reports of stigma towards affected individuals, households and communities. The objectives of this study were to (1) describe how Ebola disease stigma emerged and manifested during the 2022 Sudan ebolavirus outbreak in central Uganda, (2) examine its impacts, including on outbreak control and (3) identify insights that could inform stigma reduction strategies in future outbreaks.
We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with 12 key informants involved in the Ebola disease outbreak response using Microsoft Teams. Participants included frontline healthcare workers, burial team members, psychosocial support staff, survivor programme staff, village health team members, local outbreak response leadership and Ebola survivors. Transcribed interviews were coded in NVivo Release 1.7.2 and analysed using framework analysis.
Contextual drivers of stigma included mistrust of authorities, limited knowledge about the disease and conspicuous survivor follow-up. These drivers fuelled negative thoughts and emotions, predominantly blame and fear. Interviewees described how stigma manifested as negative attitudes, verbal and physical harm, unwarranted avoidance and structural disadvantage, which persisted beyond the outbreak itself. Stigma was seen to impact outbreak control by discouraging symptom reporting, delaying care-seeking and exacerbating workforce shortages in clinical centres. Factors that mitigated stigma included psychosocial support and survivor advocacy.
Ebola-related stigma complicates outbreak control and has adverse psychosocial effects that linger long after the outbreak is declared over. We provide a range of multilevel strategies for reducing stigma, including engagement with trusted community leaders, survivor-centred support systems and provision of psychological support for responders.
2022年苏丹埃博拉病毒在乌干达中部爆发,这是该国二十年来规模最大的一次疫情。同时有报道称,受影响的个人、家庭和社区遭受了污名化。本研究的目的是:(1)描述2022年苏丹埃博拉病毒在乌干达中部爆发期间,埃博拉疾病污名是如何出现和表现的;(2)研究其影响,包括对疫情防控的影响;(3)确定可为未来疫情中减少污名策略提供参考的见解。
我们使用Microsoft Teams对12名参与埃博拉疾病疫情应对的关键信息提供者进行了定性深入访谈。参与者包括一线医护人员、丧葬团队成员、心理社会支持人员、幸存者项目工作人员、乡村卫生团队成员、当地疫情应对负责人以及埃博拉幸存者。访谈记录在NVivo 1.7.2版本中进行编码,并采用框架分析法进行分析。
污名化的背景驱动因素包括对当局的不信任、对疾病的了解有限以及对幸存者的显著后续跟踪。这些驱动因素助长了消极的思想和情绪,主要是指责和恐惧。受访者描述了污名如何表现为消极态度、言语和身体伤害、无端回避以及结构性劣势,这些情况在疫情本身结束后仍持续存在。污名被认为通过阻碍症状报告、延迟寻求治疗以及加剧临床中心的劳动力短缺来影响疫情防控。减轻污名的因素包括心理社会支持和幸存者倡导。
与埃博拉相关的污名使疫情防控复杂化,并产生不良的心理社会影响,在宣布疫情结束后很长时间仍会存在。我们提供了一系列多层次的减少污名策略,包括与受信任的社区领袖合作、以幸存者为中心的支持系统以及为应对者提供心理支持。