• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于机器人全膝关节置换术中软组织平衡和截骨的新型人工智能算法提高了准确性和手术时长。

Novel artificial intelligence algorithm for soft tissue balancing and bone cuts in robotic total knee arthroplasty improves accuracy and surgical duration.

作者信息

Ng Matthew Song Peng, Loke Ryan Wai Keong, Tan Melvin Kian Loong, Ng Yau Hong, Liau Zi Qiang Glen

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Orthopaedics, Alexandra Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Arthroplasty. 2025 Aug 4;7(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s42836-025-00322-1.

DOI:10.1186/s42836-025-00322-1
PMID:40754533
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12320305/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty (rTKA) has become increasingly popular. Intraoperative manual planning of femur and tibia implant positions in all degrees of freedom to achieve surgeon-defined targets and limits of bone cuts, gaps, and alignment is challenging. The final manually defined solution may not be optimal, and surgical duration increases significantly. We aim to demonstrate the effectiveness of our novel algorithm in terms of accuracy and surgical duration.

METHODS

We developed a novel AI computational algorithm to optimize rTKA implant positioning in three-dimensional space. The initial parameters of 3D implant positioning and surgeon-defined target gaps and bone cuts are set. The algorithm determines permutations achieving ideal 3D implant positioning with ± 0.5 mm accuracy, ranking them by surgeon preference and evidence-based criteria. We compared accuracy in achieving surgeon-defined target gaps, intraoperative soft tissue balancing duration, and total surgical time.

RESULTS

A prospective study of 67 consecutive rTKA patients at a tertiary institution (Nov 2021-Dec 2023) was conducted. 25 patients (mean age 70.4 ± 7.34 years) had our algorithm used intraoperatively, while 42 (mean age 70.5 ± 6.90 years) did not. 92% of rTKAs using our algorithm achieved target gaps ± 1.5 mm, vs. 52% of non-algorithm rTKAs (P = 0.003). The average difference between surgeon-defined target gaps and final achieved gaps was 1.1 ± 0.5 mm in the algorithm group vs. 1.8 ± 1.0 mm in the non-algorithm group (P = 0.003). Soft tissue balancing duration was significantly shorter: 1.16 min ± 0.11 with algorithm use vs. 14.5 min ± 8.3 (P < 0.0001). Total surgical duration was also significantly lower: 38.4 min ± 14.9 vs. 73.7 min ± 19.6 (P = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

Our novel AI algorithm significantly improves accuracy in achieving surgeon-defined target extension and flexion gaps while reducing soft tissue balancing and total surgical duration. This is highly promising for achieving both reproducibility and efficiency in rTKAs. Video Abstract.

摘要

背景

机器人全膝关节置换术(rTKA)越来越受欢迎。在所有自由度上对股骨和胫骨植入物位置进行术中手动规划,以实现外科医生定义的截骨、间隙和对线目标及限制具有挑战性。最终手动确定的方案可能不是最优的,并且手术时间会显著增加。我们旨在证明我们的新算法在准确性和手术时间方面的有效性。

方法

我们开发了一种新颖的人工智能计算算法,以优化三维空间中的rTKA植入物定位。设置3D植入物定位的初始参数以及外科医生定义的目标间隙和截骨。该算法确定实现理想3D植入物定位(精度为±0.5毫米)的排列,并根据外科医生的偏好和循证标准对其进行排序。我们比较了实现外科医生定义的目标间隙的准确性、术中软组织平衡时间和总手术时间。

结果

在一家三级医疗机构(2021年11月至2023年12月)对67例连续的rTKA患者进行了前瞻性研究。25例患者(平均年龄70.4±7.34岁)术中使用了我们的算法,而42例患者(平均年龄70.5±6.90岁)未使用。使用我们算法的rTKA中有92%实现了±1.5毫米的目标间隙,而非算法rTKA为52%(P = 0.003)。算法组中外科医生定义的目标间隙与最终实现的间隙之间的平均差异为1.1±0.5毫米,非算法组为1.8±1.0毫米(P = 0.003)。软组织平衡时间显著缩短:使用算法时为1.16分钟±0.11,而未使用算法时为14.5分钟±8.3(P < 0.0001)。总手术时间也显著降低:38.4分钟±14.9,而未使用算法时为73.7分钟±19.6(P = 0.0002)。

结论

我们的新型人工智能算法在实现外科医生定义的目标伸直和屈曲间隙方面显著提高了准确性,同时减少了软组织平衡和总手术时间。这对于在rTKA中实现可重复性和效率非常有前景。视频摘要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26c/12320305/95f6688d3675/42836_2025_322_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26c/12320305/87b9d503e074/42836_2025_322_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26c/12320305/85a407260c0c/42836_2025_322_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26c/12320305/b45330a91980/42836_2025_322_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26c/12320305/1bc6ff0a13d9/42836_2025_322_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26c/12320305/95f6688d3675/42836_2025_322_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26c/12320305/87b9d503e074/42836_2025_322_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26c/12320305/85a407260c0c/42836_2025_322_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26c/12320305/b45330a91980/42836_2025_322_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26c/12320305/1bc6ff0a13d9/42836_2025_322_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c26c/12320305/95f6688d3675/42836_2025_322_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Novel artificial intelligence algorithm for soft tissue balancing and bone cuts in robotic total knee arthroplasty improves accuracy and surgical duration.用于机器人全膝关节置换术中软组织平衡和截骨的新型人工智能算法提高了准确性和手术时长。
Arthroplasty. 2025 Aug 4;7(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s42836-025-00322-1.
2
Learning curve of robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty within a surgical team: A prospective study of 115 cases.手术团队中机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的学习曲线:115例前瞻性研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2025 Jun 30:104325. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104325.
3
Evaluating the accuracy of Cuvis™ robot assisted total knee arthroplasty using offset type tensor system in ligament gap balancing.使用偏移型张量系统评估Cuvis™机器人辅助全膝关节置换术在韧带间隙平衡中的准确性。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Jun 9;68:103095. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103095. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
Current state of computer navigation and robotics in unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review with meta-analysis.单髁和全膝关节置换术中计算机导航与机器人技术的现状:一项荟萃分析的系统评价
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Nov;24(11):3482-3495. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4305-9. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
5
Difference in laxity between single- and multi-radius total knee arthroplasty implants is greatest in extension when gap-balancing at 10° flexion.当在10°屈曲位进行间隙平衡时,单半径和多半径全膝关节置换植入物之间的松弛度差异在伸直位时最大。
J Orthop. 2025 May 29;69:155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.05.047. eCollection 2025 Nov.
6
Glenoid preparation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: robotic arm-assisted preparation compared to manual preparation and patient-specific guides.反肩关节置换术中的关节盂准备:机器人手臂辅助准备与手动准备及患者特异性导板的比较
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Aug;34(8):2022-2030. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.12.007. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
7
What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity?改良杯笼技术治疗骨盆不连续性的功能、影像学和生存结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2149-2160. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003186. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
8
Robotic Assistance Is Not Associated With Decreased Early Revisions in Cementless TKA: An Analysis of the American Joint Replacement Registry.机器人辅助与非骨水泥型全膝关节置换术早期翻修率降低无关:来自美国关节置换登记处的分析
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):431-438. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003330. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
9
Can Periprosthetic Joint Infection of Tumor Prostheses Be Controlled With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention?肿瘤假体周围关节感染能否通过清创、抗生素治疗和保留植入物来控制?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):49-58. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003184. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
10
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.

本文引用的文献

1
Asymmetric gap balancing improves knee kinematic following primary total knee arthroplasty.非对称间隙平衡可改善初次全膝关节置换术后的膝关节运动学。
Arthroplasty. 2024 Apr 25;6(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s42836-024-00243-5.
2
Robotic-assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Apr;34(3):1333-1343. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03798-2. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
3
Definitions and consequences of current alignment techniques and phenotypes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) - there is no winner yet.
全膝关节置换术(TKA)中当前对线技术和表型的定义及后果——尚无定论。
J Exp Orthop. 2023 Nov 22;10(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00697-7.
4
Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a review.全膝关节置换术中的冠状面对线:综述。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2023 May 22;24(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s10195-023-00702-w.
5
The Effect of Minor Adjustments to Tibial and Femoral Component Position on Soft Tissue Balance in Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty.胫骨和股骨组件位置的微小调整对机器人全膝关节置换术中软组织平衡的影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Jun;38(6S):S238-S245. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.03.009. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
6
Inverse Kinematic Alignment for Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术的运动学逆向对准。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2022 Sep;108(5):103305. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2022.103305. Epub 2022 May 2.
7
Functional Alignment Philosophy in Total Knee Arthroplasty - Rationale and technique for the varus morphotype using a CT based robotic platform and individualized planning.全膝关节置换术中的功能对线理念——基于CT的机器人平台和个性化规划治疗内翻形态的原理与技术
SICOT J. 2022;8:11. doi: 10.1051/sicotj/2022010. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
8
Implant Malalignment may be a Risk Factor for Poor Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) Following Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA).植入物排列不齐可能是全膝关节置换术(TKA)后患者报告结局指标(PROMs)不佳的一个风险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6S):S129-S133. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.087. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
9
High accuracy of a new robotically assisted technique for total knee arthroplasty: an in vivo study.新型机器人辅助全膝关节置换术具有高精度:一项体内研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Mar;31(3):1153-1161. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06800-8. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
10
Management of instability after primary total knee arthroplasty: an evidence-based review.初次全膝关节置换术后不稳定的处理:基于证据的综述。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 20;16(1):729. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02878-5.