Pansell Jakob, Thomsson Tina, Eng Emelie, Wallin Andreas, Hirzallah Mohammad
The Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
The Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Neuroimaging. 2025 Jul-Aug;35(4):e70076. doi: 10.1111/jon.70076.
Optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measured by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a commonly used non-invasive estimate of intracranial pressure (ICP). However, methodological variations limit standardization of this promising technique. Different imaging axes are identified as one such source of ONSD POCUS methodological variation. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement and diagnostic accuracy for elevated ICP between transverse and sagittal ONSD measurements.
We conducted a post-hoc analysis of 213 intensive care patients from three prior studies. ONSD was measured in both transverse and sagittal planes, externally (ONSDext) and internally (ONSDint) of the dura mater. Agreement was assessed using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Diagnostic accuracy for detecting ICP ≥20 mmHg was evaluated using area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUROC) analyses in a subset of 139 patients.
Sagittal ONSD was significantly larger than transverse ONSD (median difference 0.2 mm, p<0.001). Agreement between transverse and sagittal ONSD was poor (CCC: 0.65 and 0.70 for right and left side ONSDext, and 0.43 and 0.51 for right and left side ONSDint). No significant differences in AUROC were found between transverse, sagittal, or averaged measurements.
Transverse and sagittal ONSD measurements are not interchangeable due to significant differences and poor agreement. Diagnostic accuracy was similar across methods. These findings support continued use of transverse measurement as the standard approach for ONSD POCUS in clinical practice.
通过床旁超声(POCUS)测量的视神经鞘直径(ONSD)是一种常用的颅内压(ICP)无创评估方法。然而,方法学上的差异限制了这项有前景技术的标准化。不同的成像轴被认为是ONSD POCUS方法学差异的一个来源。本研究旨在评估横断位和矢状位ONSD测量之间对于ICP升高的一致性和诊断准确性。
我们对来自三项先前研究的213例重症监护患者进行了事后分析。在硬脑膜的外部(ONSDext)和内部(ONSDint)测量横断位和矢状位的ONSD。使用林氏一致性相关系数(CCC)评估一致性。在139例患者的子集中,使用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)分析评估检测ICP≥20 mmHg的诊断准确性。
矢状位ONSD显著大于横断位ONSD(中位数差异0.2 mm,p<0.001)。横断位和矢状位ONSD之间的一致性较差(右侧和左侧ONSDext的CCC分别为0.65和0.70,右侧和左侧ONSDint的CCC分别为0.43和0.51)。横断位、矢状位或平均测量之间的AUROC没有显著差异。
由于显著差异和较差的一致性,横断位和矢状位ONSD测量不可互换。各方法的诊断准确性相似。这些发现支持在临床实践中继续将横断位测量作为ONSD POCUS的标准方法。