• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年人使用移动应用程序的心理影响因素及用户体验机制。

The psychological influencing factors for the elderly in using mobile applications and the mechanism of user experience.

作者信息

Jin Shining

机构信息

School of Design, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 18;16:1609302. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1609302. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1609302
PMID:40755542
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12313668/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study is purposed to assess the user experience factors of elderly mobile applications from the cognitive psychology perspective and establish a comprehensive evaluation index system for the elderly-friendly experience of mobile applications.

METHODS

The research subjects were the elderly. Their basic information, mobilephone usage experience, and demands for elderly-friendly experience were collected via questionnaires. The questionnaire design with a focus on the cognitive capabilities of the elderly as well as their emotional responses. Factor analysis was employed to process the questionnaire data, and three main factors were extracted: perceivability, operability, and comprehensibility. Additionally, the actual usage of two elderly-friendly mobile applications (WeChat and Toutiao Big Font Version) was evaluated through task tests. The task tests involved tasks such as mode switching, information viewing, and completion of specific operations.

RESULTS

The research findings demonstrate that perceptibility, operability, and comprehensibility are the principal factors affecting the mobile application experience of elderly users. Specifically, factors such as adjusting the font size of the interface, increasing the line spacing and character spacing of paragraph text, and providing images and text descriptions on the interface have a significant impact on the user experience. For instance, larger fonts and clear icon designs can significantly enhance the information perception ability of the elderly and reduce visual fatigue. Simple gesture operations and sufficient response time contribute to improving operability and resolving the operational difficulties resulting from the elderly's motor skill limitations. Furthermore, the research also discovered that the age of elderly users have varying degrees of influence on the evaluation indicators of elderly-friendly design.

CONCLUSION

This study, starting from the cognitive psychology perspective, proposes a scientific evaluation framework for elderly-friendly design, emphasizing the significance of considering the cognitive abilities and emotional needs of elderly users in the design process. The research results provide a theoretical foundation for the design and improvement of mobile applications, facilitating the enhancement of the usage experience and satisfaction of elderly users. Future research can further expand the sample range, conduct long-term follow-up studies, and integrate emerging technologies to optimize elderly-friendly design.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在从认知心理学角度评估老年移动应用的用户体验因素,并建立移动应用老年友好体验的综合评价指标体系。

方法

以老年人为研究对象,通过问卷调查收集其基本信息、手机使用经验以及对老年友好体验的需求。问卷设计聚焦于老年人的认知能力及其情感反应。采用因子分析法对问卷数据进行处理,提取出三个主要因素:可感知性、可操作性和可理解性。此外,通过任务测试对两款老年友好型移动应用(微信和今日头条大字版)的实际使用情况进行评估。任务测试包括模式切换、信息查看和特定操作完成等任务。

结果

研究结果表明,可感知性、可操作性和可理解性是影响老年用户移动应用体验的主要因素。具体而言,界面字体大小调整、段落文本行间距和字符间距增加以及界面提供图像和文字描述等因素对用户体验有显著影响。例如,较大的字体和清晰的图标设计可显著提高老年人的信息感知能力并减轻视觉疲劳。简单的手势操作和充足的响应时间有助于提高可操作性并解决因老年人运动技能受限导致的操作困难。此外,研究还发现老年用户的年龄对老年友好设计的评价指标有不同程度的影响。

结论

本研究从认知心理学角度出发,提出了老年友好设计的科学评价框架,强调在设计过程中考虑老年用户认知能力和情感需求的重要性。研究结果为移动应用的设计和改进提供了理论基础,有助于提高老年用户的使用体验和满意度。未来研究可进一步扩大样本范围,进行长期跟踪研究,并整合新兴技术以优化老年友好设计。

相似文献

1
The psychological influencing factors for the elderly in using mobile applications and the mechanism of user experience.老年人使用移动应用程序的心理影响因素及用户体验机制。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 18;16:1609302. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1609302. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
3
Mobile phone messaging for facilitating self-management of long-term illnesses.利用手机短信促进慢性病自我管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007459. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007459.pub2.
4
Mobile phone messaging for preventive health care.用于预防性医疗保健的手机短信服务。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007457. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007457.pub2.
5
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Design Guidelines of Mobile Apps for Older Adults: Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis.移动应用程序设计指南:老年人系统评价和主题分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Sep 21;11:e43186. doi: 10.2196/43186.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of computer and other electronic aids for smoking cessation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.计算机和其他电子戒烟辅助手段的有效性和成本效益:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(38):1-205, iii-v. doi: 10.3310/hta16380.
10
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.

本文引用的文献

1
Designing a Tangible User Interface (TUI) for the Elderly Based on Their Motivations and Game Elements.基于老年人动机和游戏元素设计的有形用户界面(TUI)。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Nov 30;23(23):9513. doi: 10.3390/s23239513.
2
Predictors of the Level of Physical Activity in Physically Active Older People.身体活跃的老年人身体活动水平的预测因素
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 14;12(9):331. doi: 10.3390/bs12090331.
3
Designing Combinations of Pictogram and Text Size for Icons: Effects of Text Size, Pictogram Size, and Familiarity on Older Adults' Visual Search Performance.
为图标设计图标和文字大小的组合:文字大小、图标大小和熟悉度对老年人视觉搜索表现的影响。
Hum Factors. 2023 Dec;65(8):1577-1595. doi: 10.1177/00187208211061938. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
4
The development of a mobile user interface ability evaluation system for the elderly.老年人移动用户界面能力评估系统的开发。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Nov;89:103215. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103215. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
5
The Importance of User Involvement: A Systematic Review of Involving Older Users in Technology Design.用户参与的重要性:一项涉及让老年用户参与技术设计的系统综述。
Gerontologist. 2020 Sep 15;60(7):e513-e523. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz163.
6
Mobile health for older adult patients: Using an aging barriers framework to classify usability problems.移动医疗在老年患者中的应用:利用老龄化障碍框架对可用性问题进行分类。
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Apr;124:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.006. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
7
The Digital Divide in Health-Related Technology Use: The Significance of Race/Ethnicity.健康相关技术使用中的数字鸿沟:种族/民族的重要性。
Gerontologist. 2019 Jan 9;59(1):6-14. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny138.
8
Older Adults Talk Technology: Technology Usage and Attitudes.老年人谈科技:科技使用与态度
Comput Human Behav. 2010 Nov 1;26(6):1710-1721. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.020.
9
Memory function in normal aging.
Acta Neurol Scand Suppl. 2003;179:7-13. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.107.s179.5.x.
10
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.积极和消极情绪简短测量方法的编制与验证:PANAS量表
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988 Jun;54(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.1063.