Suppr超能文献

重温亲密关系中的信任。

Trust in close relationships revisited.

作者信息

Camanto Omar J, Campbell Lorne

机构信息

University of Western Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Soc Pers Relat. 2025 May 27;42(9):2516-2544. doi: 10.1177/02654075251346105. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Trust is widely regarded as a fundamental psychological concept in the study of relationships yet-rather than being investigated as a primary, material focus-is often relegated to serving as a proxy for and/or a means to facilitate the exploration of aspects of relationship quality and functioning. We conducted two measurement-focused studies to garner deeper insight into the nature of trust in romantic relationships and explore an account of trust that reframes its development as a process of construction, rather than addition. In Study 1 ( = 494), we explored the nature and structure of the construct of trust as put forward by Rempel et al. (1985). In Study 2 ( = 847), we then confirmed our findings from Study 1 and, using measurement invariance techniques and a refined version of Rempel et al.'s (1985) assessment, investigated the extent to which the trust of individuals involved in newly-formed relationships ( = 387) versus individuals involved in long term relationships ( = 460) reflect different conceptualizations of the construct. Across both studies, we (a) identified a compilation of items reflecting key factors of trust-Predictability (3 items), Dependability (4 items), and Faith (10 items)-resembling Rempel et al.'s (1985) framework; and (b) found broad sameness in the construct of trust across newly-formed and long-term relationships but also some granular differences that potentially suggest how the construct may change across stages of relationship development.

摘要

信任在人际关系研究中被广泛视为一个基本的心理学概念,然而,它并非作为主要的实质性焦点进行研究,而是常常被用作一种替代物和/或一种手段,以促进对关系质量和功能方面的探索。我们进行了两项以测量为重点的研究,以更深入地了解浪漫关系中信任的本质,并探索一种将信任发展重新构建为一个建构过程而非累加过程的信任解释。在研究1(N = 494)中,我们探讨了Rempel等人(1985年)提出的信任结构的本质和结构。在研究2(N = 847)中,我们随后证实了研究1的结果,并使用测量不变性技术以及Rempel等人(1985年)评估的改进版本,研究了新建立关系中的个体(n = 387)与长期关系中的个体(n = 460)的信任在多大程度上反映了该结构的不同概念化。在两项研究中,我们(a)确定了一组反映信任关键因素的项目——可预测性(3项)、可靠性(4项)和信念(10项)——类似于Rempel等人(1985年)的框架;(b)发现新建立关系和长期关系中的信任结构大体相同,但也存在一些细微差异,这些差异可能暗示了该结构在关系发展阶段可能如何变化。

相似文献

1
Trust in close relationships revisited.重温亲密关系中的信任。
J Soc Pers Relat. 2025 May 27;42(9):2516-2544. doi: 10.1177/02654075251346105. eCollection 2025 Sep.
6
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.

本文引用的文献

4
Adult attachment and trust in romantic relationships.成人依恋与浪漫关系中的信任。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Feb;25:148-151. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
6
The Symbolic Nature of Trust in Heterosexual Adolescent Romantic Relationships.异性恋青少年恋爱关系中信任的象征性质。
Arch Sex Behav. 2017 Aug;46(6):1673-1684. doi: 10.1007/s10508-017-0971-z. Epub 2017 May 15.
9
Trust and biased memory of transgressions in romantic relationships.浪漫关系中背叛的信任和偏见记忆。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Apr;104(4):673-94. doi: 10.1037/a0031054. Epub 2013 Feb 11.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验