• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

真正的共同设计:新西兰实现健康公平的必要前提。

Authentic co-design: an essential prerequisite to health equity in Aotearoa New Zealand.

作者信息

Goodwin Deborah Waireka Tuhi, Boulton Amohia, Stayner Cherie, Mann Jim

机构信息

DBZ Consultancy Ltd, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Whakauae Research Services Ltd, Whanganui, New Zealand.

出版信息

J R Soc N Z. 2025 Apr 2;55(6):2600-2614. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2025.2480207. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1080/03036758.2025.2480207
PMID:40756847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12315192/
Abstract

Current approaches to co-design with Māori and Pacific communities have varying success, highlighting the need for a clear and transparent understanding about the different ways that researchers and communities conceptualise and implement co-design. This study set out to identify key elements of co-designed research and health services important to working with, and achieving equity of health outcomes for, Māori and Pacific communities living in Aotearoa New Zealand. A qualitative evaluation of five research projects, which used co-design with partners from Māori and Pacific communities, involved interviews with researchers and community partners. A Kaupapa Māori framework developed to assess six principles important to Māori co-design was used, and data were coded and thematically analysed. Four additional principles of good co-design and nine lessons for improving the conduct of co-design research were identified. A conceptual model was developed, the Co-design Research Integrity Poutama, which defines increasing levels of co-design exemplified by greater levels of transparency and power-sharing. Authentic co-design of research and health services has a greater likelihood of achieving equitable health outcomes in Māori (the Indigenous People of Aotearoa New Zealand) and in other ethnicities experiencing similar inequities, notably Pacific Peoples, and to those experiencing racial and ethnic inequities worldwide.

摘要

目前与毛利族和太平洋岛民社区共同设计的方法取得的成功各不相同,这凸显了对研究人员和社区在概念化和实施共同设计方面的不同方式有清晰透明理解的必要性。本研究旨在确定共同设计的研究和卫生服务的关键要素,这些要素对于与生活在新西兰奥塔哥的毛利族和太平洋岛民社区合作以及实现健康结果公平至关重要。对五个研究项目进行了定性评估,这些项目与毛利族和太平洋岛民社区的合作伙伴采用了共同设计,涉及对研究人员和社区合作伙伴的访谈。使用了一个为评估对毛利族共同设计重要的六项原则而制定的毛利族框架,对数据进行了编码和主题分析。确定了共同设计的另外四项原则以及改进共同设计研究实施的九条经验教训。开发了一个概念模型——共同设计研究诚信波塔马,它定义了以更高透明度和权力分享为代表的共同设计水平的提升。研究和卫生服务的真正共同设计更有可能在毛利族(新西兰奥塔哥的原住民)以及其他经历类似不平等的种族(特别是太平洋岛民)以及全球经历种族和族裔不平等的人群中实现公平的健康结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3df6/12315192/725f937478fa/TNZR_A_2480207_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3df6/12315192/725f937478fa/TNZR_A_2480207_F0001_OC.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3df6/12315192/725f937478fa/TNZR_A_2480207_F0001_OC.jpg

相似文献

1
Authentic co-design: an essential prerequisite to health equity in Aotearoa New Zealand.真正的共同设计:新西兰实现健康公平的必要前提。
J R Soc N Z. 2025 Apr 2;55(6):2600-2614. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2025.2480207. eCollection 2025.
2
A scoping review of ear and hearing health research in Aotearoa New Zealand: a focus on equity.新西兰奥塔哥地区耳与听力健康研究的范围综述:聚焦公平性
J R Soc N Z. 2025 Jan 15;55(3):611-632. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2024.2435394. eCollection 2025.
3
Whakawhanaungatanga-Building trust and connections: A qualitative study indigenous Māori patients and whānau (extended family network) hospital experiences.建立信任和联系:一项针对毛利族患者及其家庭(大家庭网络)的医院体验的定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Apr;80(4):1545-1558. doi: 10.1111/jan.15912. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
4
A novel framework for Indigenous eye health care in New Zealand: Ngā Mata o te Ariki.新西兰本土眼保健的一个新框架:Ngā Mata o te Ariki。
Clin Exp Optom. 2024 Aug 18:1-8. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2024.2388139.
5
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
6
"I don't think service changed, I think people changed": Palliative care delivery in Aotearoa/New Zealand after COVID-19.“我认为服务没有改变,而是人变了”:新冠疫情后新西兰的姑息治疗服务
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Jun 24;19:26323524251343095. doi: 10.1177/26323524251343095. eCollection 2025.
7
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
8
Māori and Pasifika Whānau expertise and experiences in the ear and hearing health system in the Counties Manukau Region, Auckland.毛利人和太平洋岛民家庭在奥克兰曼努考县地区耳部及听力健康系统方面的专业知识和经验。
J R Soc N Z. 2024 Dec 4;55(3):704-720. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2024.2432468. eCollection 2025.
9
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comprehensive Review of Optimal Approaches to Co-Design in Health with First Nations Australians.《与澳大利亚原住民共同设计健康方案的最优方法综合述评》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 2;19(23):16166. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192316166.
2
Navigating the space between co-design and mahitahi: Building bridges between knowledge systems on behalf of communities.在共同设计和毛利智慧之间的空间中航行:代表社区在知识体系之间架起桥梁。
Aust J Rural Health. 2022 Dec;30(6):830-835. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12916. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
3
Co-design for indigenous and other children and young people from priority social groups: A systematic review.
为原住民及其他优先社会群体中的儿童和年轻人开展共同设计:一项系统综述。
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Mar 28;18:101077. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101077. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Pasifika Prediabetes Youth Empowerment Programme: learnings from a youth-led community-based intervention study.太平洋岛国糖尿病前期青年赋权计划:基于社区的青年主导干预研究的经验教训。
N Z Med J. 2021 Feb 19;134(1530):57-68.
5
A co-designed mHealth programme to support healthy lifestyles in Māori and Pasifika peoples in New Zealand (OL@-OR@): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.一项针对新西兰毛利人和太平洋岛民的健康生活方式的共同设计的移动健康计划(OL@-OR@):一项集群随机对照试验。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Oct;1(6):e298-e307. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30130-X. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
6
Disparities in Cancer-Specific Survival Between Māori and Non-Māori New Zealanders, 2007-2016.2007 - 2016年新西兰毛利人与非毛利人之间特定癌症生存率的差异
JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Jun;6:766-774. doi: 10.1200/GO.20.00028.
7
Critical reflection for researcher-community partnership effectiveness: the He Pikinga Waiora process evaluation tool guiding the implementation of chronic condition interventions in Indigenous communities.研究人员与社区伙伴关系有效性的批判性反思:“He Pikinga Waiora”过程评估工具指导原住民社区慢性病干预措施的实施
Aust J Prim Health. 2019 Nov;25(5):478-485. doi: 10.1071/PY19022.
8
Maintenance and Development of Social Connection by People with Long-term Conditions: A Qualitative Study.长期病患人群社会联系的维护和发展:定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 May 28;16(11):1875. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16111875.
9
Codesigning health and other public services with vulnerable and disadvantaged populations: Insights from an international collaboration.与弱势和处境不利人群共同设计卫生和其他公共服务:国际合作的见解。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):284-297. doi: 10.1111/hex.12864. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
Mana Tū: a whānau ora approach to type 2 diabetes.玛纳图:一种针对2型糖尿病的家庭健康方法。
N Z Med J. 2018 Nov 9;131(1485):76-83.