• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倡导技能评估指南:一项效度研究。

Advocacy skills assessment guide: a validity study.

作者信息

Ateş Esin, Altuğ Özsoy Süheyla

机构信息

Department of Public Health Nursing, Ege University Faculty of Nursing, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 4;24(1):1006. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03677-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-03677-7
PMID:40760657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12323035/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nurses should act as individual/patient advocates, since it is part of their basic responsibilities. However, previous studies reported that although nurses know that they need to defend patients, they do not know what patient advocacy is and how to fulfil this role. They have difficulty in advocating for patients and cannot carry it out effectively. This study was conducted to evaluate the advocacy skills of nursing students, develop a guide for the advocacy skills of nurses working in the field, and to verify the content validity.

METHOD

This guideline development and validation study was conducted in four stages: [1] setting goals for social justice advocacy [2], selecting social justice advocacy skills [3], developing a social justice advocacy skill guide and [4] conducting the pilot study. The development and validation study involved 33 participants, student nurses, licensed nurses, professors, associate professors, assistant professors, and research assistants. For the content validity of the guide, the content validity index, i.e. the percentage of experts who answered 3 or 4 points answered by the experts, was calculated. Kendall W test was used to determine the degree of agreement between the scores of multiple experts.

RESULTS

All content validity index (CVI) scores were in the "good" to "excellent" range. The CVI scores given by all specialists ranged from 0.73 to 1. As a result of the Kendall W test, it was found that there was agreement among the experts (p < 0.001). Public health nurses were asked to evaluate the guide on a scale of 1 to 10 points. The mean score of nurses for the guide as a guideline for their advocacy skills was determined as 9.0 ± 0.816, and 70% of the nurses gave a score of ≥ 9.

CONCLUSION

The developed 'Advocacy Skills Evaluation Guide' was found to be a valid measurement tool.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

摘要

背景

护士应充当个人/患者的倡导者,因为这是其基本职责的一部分。然而,以往研究报告称,尽管护士知道他们需要为患者辩护,但他们并不清楚什么是患者代言以及如何履行这一角色。他们在为患者代言方面存在困难,且无法有效开展。本研究旨在评估护理专业学生的代言技能,为该领域工作的护士制定代言技能指南,并验证其内容效度。

方法

本指南制定与验证研究分四个阶段进行:[1]设定社会正义倡导目标;[2]选择社会正义倡导技能;[3]制定社会正义倡导技能指南;[4]开展预试验。该制定与验证研究涉及33名参与者,包括实习护士、执业护士、教授、副教授、助理教授和研究助理。对于指南的内容效度,计算了内容效度指数,即回答为3分或4分的专家百分比。使用肯德尔W检验来确定多位专家评分之间的一致程度。

结果

所有内容效度指数(CVI)得分均在“良好”至“优秀”范围内。所有专家给出的CVI得分在0.73至1之间。肯德尔W检验结果表明,专家之间存在一致性(p < 0.001)。公共卫生护士被要求对该指南进行1至10分的评分。护士对该指南作为其代言技能指南的平均评分为9.0 ± 0.816,70%的护士给出了≥ 9分的评分。

结论

所制定的“代言技能评估指南”被发现是一种有效的测量工具。

临床试验编号

不适用。

相似文献

1
Advocacy skills assessment guide: a validity study.倡导技能评估指南:一项效度研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 4;24(1):1006. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03677-7.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
6
Nurses' experiences of advocacy in the perioperative department: a systematic review.护士在围手术期科室的维权经历:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Sep 16;13(8):146-89. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2141.
7
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Patient buy-in to social prescribing through link workers as part of person-centred care: a realist evaluation.患者通过联络人员接受社会处方作为以患者为中心的护理的一部分:一项现实主义评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 25:1-17. doi: 10.3310/ETND8254.
9
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术对女性和医护人员的可行性、可接受性及适宜性:LAVA试验定性过程评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325.
10
Autistic Students' Experiences of Employment and Employability Support while Studying at a UK University.自闭症学生在英国大学学习期间的就业经历及就业支持情况
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Apr 3;7(2):212-222. doi: 10.1089/aut.2024.0112. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Perception and opinion of nursing faculties regarding advocacy role: A qualitative research.护理教师对倡导角色的认知和看法:一项定性研究。
Nurs Forum. 2020 Nov;55(4):637-644. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12480. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
2
NLN Releases A Vision for Integration of the Social Determinants of Health Into Nursing Education Curricula.美国护理联盟发布了一项将健康的社会决定因素纳入护理教育课程的愿景。
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2019 Nov/Dec;40(6):390. doi: 10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000597.
3
Registered Nurses' description of patient advocacy in the clinical setting.注册护士对临床环境中患者权益维护的描述。
Nurs Open. 2019 May 29;6(3):1124-1132. doi: 10.1002/nop2.307. eCollection 2019 Jul.
4
Patient Advocacy at the APRN Level: A Direction for the Future.
Nurs Forum. 2018 Jan;53(1):5-11. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12209. Epub 2017 Apr 11.
5
Patient advocacy by nurses - past, present and future.护士的患者权益倡导——过去、现在与未来。
Contemp Nurse. 2016 Dec;52(6):696-709. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2016.1235981. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
6
Eliminating Health Disparities through Action on the Social Determinants of Health: A Systematic Review of Home Visiting in the United States, 2005-2015.通过对健康的社会决定因素采取行动消除健康差距:对2005 - 2015年美国家访的系统评价
Public Health Nurs. 2017 Jan;34(1):2-30. doi: 10.1111/phn.12268. Epub 2016 May 5.
7
The Concept of Advocacy in Nursing: A Critical Analysis.护理中的倡导概念:批判性分析
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2015 Oct-Dec;34(4):308-15. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0000000000000079.
8
Community health nursing advocacy: a concept analysis.社区健康护理倡导:概念分析
J Community Health Nurs. 2015;32(2):115-28. doi: 10.1080/07370016.2015.1024547.
9
Population-focused nursing: advocacy for vulnerable populations in an RN-BSN program.以人群为中心的护理:在护理学学士课程中为弱势群体发声。
Public Health Nurs. 2014 Sep-Oct;31(5):463-71. doi: 10.1111/phn.12114. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
10
Developing a comprehensive curriculum for public health advocacy.制定公共卫生宣传综合课程。
Health Promot Pract. 2012 Nov;13(6):733-7. doi: 10.1177/1524839912457682. Epub 2012 Sep 17.