Suppr超能文献

用于接受阿片类激动剂治疗或患有阿片类药物使用障碍患者的慢性非癌性疼痛的阿片类镇痛药:一项系统评价。

Opioid analgesics for chronic noncancer pain in patients prescribed opioid agonist therapy or with opioid use disorder: A systematic review.

作者信息

Ashoorion Vahid, Sood Tushar, Muneer Shezel, Busse Jason W, Rice Danielle, Swidrovich Jaris, Majid Umair, Abesteh James, Mao Randi Q, Sud Abhimanyu

机构信息

Research, Humber River Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Pain. 2025 Jul 31;9(1):2499553. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2025.2499553. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is a growing public health concern in North America, often coexisting with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP). Managing both conditions presents unique challenges, highlighting the need for evidence to guide decision making.

AIM

The study aimed to conduct a systematic review that summarizes evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of opioid analgesics alone or in combination with opioid agonist therapy (OAT) to manage CNCP in people with OUD or with a history of OUD.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and AMED from inception to July 2023 for randomized studies and up to January 2025 for non-randomized studies that explored the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of opioids for people living with chronic pain and current or prior OUD. We assessed the risk of bias in included studies, evaluated the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach, and provided a narrative summary of treatment effects.

RESULTS

Our search identified 15,988 unique citations, of which six observational studies were deemed eligible to inform safety outcomes for review, while no observational studies or RCTs met the eligibility criteria for efficacy or effectiveness outcomes. The likelihood of suicidality was twice as high in CNCP patients with OUD receiving long-term opioid analgesics compared to those without OUD (absolute risk increase: 127; 95% CI: 36 to 249 more participants with suicidality in 1,000 participants; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to opioid analgesics alone, the risk of fatal opioid-related overdose may decrease in patients with CNCP and OUD who receive both opioid analgesics and OAT (absolute risk reduction: 60; 95%CI: 18 to 94 fewer deaths in 1,000 participants; low certainty evidence).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a paucity of evidence to inform practice and policy regarding opioid analgesic prescribing amongst people with OUD. Existing evidence suggests that such prescribing is associated with a higher risk of suicidality, while the use of OAT together with opioid analgesics in this population may be protective against fatal overdose. Further observational and trial research is needed to clarify the benefits and harms of opioid analgesics for CNCP patients with OUD.

摘要

背景

阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)在北美日益引起公众健康关注,常与慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)并存。同时管理这两种病症带来了独特挑战,凸显了需要有证据来指导决策。

目的

本研究旨在进行一项系统评价,总结单独使用阿片类镇痛药或与阿片类激动剂疗法(OAT)联合使用以管理患有OUD或有OUD病史者的CNCP的疗效、有效性和安全性方面的证据。

方法

我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL和AMED,从数据库创建至2023年7月查找随机对照研究,至2025年1月查找非随机对照研究,这些研究探讨了阿片类药物对患有慢性疼痛以及当前或既往患有OUD者的疗效、有效性和安全性。我们评估了纳入研究的偏倚风险,使用GRADE方法评估证据质量,并提供了治疗效果的叙述性总结。

结果

我们的检索共识别出15988条独特的文献引用,其中六项观察性研究被认为符合纳入标准,可为安全性结果的综述提供信息,而没有观察性研究或随机对照试验符合疗效或有效性结果的纳入标准。与没有OUD的CNCP患者相比,接受长期阿片类镇痛药的患有OUD的CNCP患者自杀的可能性高出两倍(绝对风险增加:127;95%置信区间:每1000名参与者中,有自杀倾向的参与者多36至249人;中等确定性证据)。与单独使用阿片类镇痛药相比,同时接受阿片类镇痛药和OAT的患有CNCP和OUD的患者发生致命性阿片类药物过量的风险可能会降低(绝对风险降低:60;95%置信区间:每1000名参与者中死亡人数减少18至94人;低确定性证据)。

结论

在为患有OUD的患者开具阿片类镇痛药处方方面,缺乏为实践和政策提供依据的证据。现有证据表明,此类处方与更高的自杀风险相关,而在该人群中将OAT与阿片类镇痛药联合使用可能对预防致命性过量有保护作用。需要进一步的观察性和试验性研究来阐明阿片类镇痛药对患有OUD的CNCP患者的益处和危害。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb2a/12320809/e4a3c9e926f2/UCJP_A_2499553_F0001_OC.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验