Department of Medical Education, Horizon Health Network, Dr. Everett Chalmers Regional Hospital, 700 Priestman Street, Fredericton, NB E3B 5N5, Canada.
Department of Cellular & Physiological Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Curr Oncol. 2023 Feb 26;30(3):2770-2780. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030210.
Over the past decade, patient engagement (PE) has emerged as an important way to help improve the relevance, quality, and impact of health research. However, there is limited consensus on how best to meaningfully engage patients in the research process. The goal of this article is to share our experiences and insights as members of a Patient Advisory Committee (PAC) on a large, multidisciplinary cancer research study that has spanned six years. We hope by sharing our reflections of the PAC experiences, we can highlight successes, challenges, and lessons learned to help guide PE in future health research. To the best of our knowledge, few publications describing PE experiences in health research teams have been written by patients, survivors, or family caregivers themselves.
A qualitative approach was used to gather reflections from members of the Patient Advisory Committee regarding their experiences in participating in a research study over six years. Each member completed an online survey and engaged in a group discussion based on the emergent themes from the survey responses.
Our reflections about experiences as a PAC on a large, pan-Canadian research study include three overarching topics (1) what worked well; (2) areas for improvement; and (3) reflections on our overall contribution and impact. Overall, we found the experience positive and experienced personal satisfaction but there were areas where future improvements could be made. These areas include earlier engagement and training in the research process, more frequent communication between the patient committee and the research team, and on-going monitoring regarding the nature of the patient engagement.
Engaging individuals who have experienced the types of events which are the focus of a research study can contribute to the overall relevance of the project. However, intentional efforts are necessary to ensure satisfactory involvement.
在过去的十年中,患者参与(PE)已成为帮助提高健康研究相关性、质量和影响力的重要途径。然而,对于如何才能真正让患者参与到研究过程中,目前尚未达成共识。本文的目的是分享我们作为一个大型多学科癌症研究项目的患者顾问委员会(PAC)成员的经验和见解,该研究已经持续了六年。我们希望通过分享我们对 PAC 经验的思考,突出成功、挑战和经验教训,以帮助指导未来健康研究中的 PE。据我们所知,很少有出版物由患者、幸存者或家属自己描述健康研究团队中的 PE 经验。
采用定性方法收集患者顾问委员会成员对他们在六年多的研究中参与研究的经验的反思。每位成员都完成了一份在线调查,并根据调查回复中的新兴主题进行了小组讨论。
我们对作为一个大型、泛加研究项目的 PAC 的经验的反思包括三个方面:(1)效果好的方面;(2)改进的领域;(3)对我们整体贡献和影响的反思。总的来说,我们认为这次经历是积极的,个人也感到满意,但也有一些可以改进的地方。这些方面包括在研究过程中更早地参与和培训,患者委员会和研究团队之间更频繁的沟通,以及对患者参与的性质进行持续监测。
让经历过研究重点事件的个人参与进来,可以提高项目的整体相关性。然而,有必要进行有意的努力,以确保满意的参与。