Threlfall Lynsey, Cong Cen, Riccalton Victoria, Meinert Edward, Plummer Chris
Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Aug 5;32(1):e101417. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101417.
The second iteration of the National Early Warning Score has been adopted widely within the UK and internationally. It uses routinely collected physiological measurements to standardise the assessment and response to acute illness. Its use is associated with reduced mortality but has limited positive and negative predictive accuracy. There is a growing body of research demonstrating the effectiveness of artificial intelligence (AI) in predicting clinical deterioration, but there is limited evidence to show which aspect of AI is best suited to this task. This systematic review aims to establish which AI or machine learning algorithm is best suited to analysing physiological data sets to predict patient deterioration in a hospital setting.
A systematic review will be conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) and the PICOS (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome and Study) frameworks. Eight databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore and ACM Digital Library) will be used to search for studies published from 2007 to the present that meet the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers will screen the studies identified and extract data independently, with any discrepancies resolved by discussion. The review is expected to be completed by January 2026, and the results will be presented in publication by June 2026.
Ethical approval is not required as data will be obtained from published sources. Findings from this study will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
英国国家早期预警评分(National Early Warning Score)的第二次迭代版本已在英国国内和国际上广泛采用。它利用常规收集的生理测量数据来规范对急性疾病的评估和应对措施。其使用与死亡率降低相关,但阳性和阴性预测准确性有限。越来越多的研究表明人工智能(AI)在预测临床病情恶化方面具有有效性,但证据有限,无法表明AI的哪个方面最适合这项任务。本系统评价旨在确定哪种人工智能或机器学习算法最适合分析生理数据集,以预测医院环境中的患者病情恶化情况。
将根据PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)和PICOS(人群、干预措施、对照、结局和研究)框架进行系统评价。将使用八个数据库(PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、科学网、Scopus、IEEE Xplore和ACM数字图书馆)搜索2007年至今发表的符合纳入标准的研究。两名评审员将独立筛选所识别的研究并提取数据,任何差异将通过讨论解决。预计该评价将于2026年1月完成,结果将于2026年6月在出版物中呈现。
由于数据将从已发表的来源获取,因此无需伦理批准。本研究的结果将通过在同行评审期刊上发表进行传播。