• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

克服年轻成年癌症幸存者对癌症复发的恐惧:一种以医疗保健专业人员为中心的基于资源的方法——系统评价和主题综合方案

Overcoming fear of cancer recurrence in young adult survivors: a resource-based approach centred on healthcare professionals - a protocol for systematic reviews and thematic synthesis.

作者信息

Nam Soo-Hyun, Kim Jiu

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Gyeongkuk National University, 1375 Gyeongdong-ro, Andong 36729, Republic of Korea.

College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 5;15(8):e105263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105263.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105263
PMID:40764075
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12336467/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is one of the most prevalent psychological concerns among young adult cancer survivors. Despite its clinical relevance, little is known about how survivors overcome this fear and the role of healthcare professionals in that process. This protocol outlines a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis to explore the coping mechanisms and support resources that facilitate overcoming FCR in young adult cancer survivors.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols guidelines. A comprehensive search will be conducted across five databases (PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Social Sciences Citation Index) and supplemented by hand-searching. Methodological quality will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Data synthesis will follow Thomas and Harden's thematic synthesis approach, guided by the post-traumatic growth theory. The review aims to identify key support systems and professional interventions that aid in coping with FCR, emphasising the unique developmental and psychosocial context of young adulthood. The final synthesis will inform targeted, resource-based interventions by healthcare providers.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

As this study is a retrospective review involving secondary analysis of publicly available primary data, ethical approval is not required. The findings of this review will be disseminated through publication in peer-reviewed journals and presented at scholarly conferences and other relevant professional forums. This protocol has been registered with PROSPERO.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD420251029414.

摘要

引言

对癌症复发的恐惧(FCR)是年轻成年癌症幸存者中最普遍的心理担忧之一。尽管其具有临床相关性,但对于幸存者如何克服这种恐惧以及医疗保健专业人员在此过程中的作用知之甚少。本方案概述了一项系统评价和定性元综合分析,以探索有助于年轻成年癌症幸存者克服对癌症复发恐惧的应对机制和支持资源。

方法与分析

本研究将遵循系统评价和元分析方案的首选报告项目指南。将在五个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO、护理及相关健康文献累积索引、社会科学引文索引)中进行全面检索,并辅以手工检索。将使用批判性评估技能计划清单评估方法学质量。数据综合将遵循托马斯和哈登的主题综合方法,以创伤后成长理论为指导。该评价旨在确定有助于应对对癌症复发恐惧的关键支持系统和专业干预措施,强调年轻成年期独特的发展和社会心理背景。最终的综合分析将为医疗保健提供者提供有针对性的、基于资源的干预措施提供信息。

伦理与传播

由于本研究是一项回顾性评价,涉及对公开可用的原始数据进行二次分析,因此无需伦理批准。本评价的结果将通过在同行评审期刊上发表以及在学术会议和其他相关专业论坛上展示来传播。本方案已在PROSPERO注册。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD420251029414。

相似文献

1
Overcoming fear of cancer recurrence in young adult survivors: a resource-based approach centred on healthcare professionals - a protocol for systematic reviews and thematic synthesis.克服年轻成年癌症幸存者对癌症复发的恐惧:一种以医疗保健专业人员为中心的基于资源的方法——系统评价和主题综合方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 5;15(8):e105263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105263.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
7
Factors within the clinical encounter that impact upon risk assessment within child and adolescent mental health services: a rapid realist synthesis.临床接触中的影响儿童和青少年心理健康服务风险评估的因素:快速现实主义综合评估。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jan;12(1):1-107. doi: 10.3310/VKTY5822.
8
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
9
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
10
Adherence to tuberculosis (TB) treatment in high compared to low TB burden countries: study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis with a qualitative meta-synthesis of themes.与低结核病负担国家相比,高结核病负担国家的结核病治疗依从性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析的研究方案以及主题的定性元综合分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 25;15(1):e089507. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089507.

本文引用的文献

1
How should the healthcare system support cancer survivors? Survivors' and health professionals' expectations and perception on comprehensive cancer survivorship care in Korea: a qualitative study.医疗体系应如何为癌症幸存者提供支持?韩国一项定性研究调查了癌症幸存者及其卫生保健专业人员对综合癌症生存护理的期望和看法。
BMC Cancer. 2023 Dec 20;23(1):1255. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11736-y.
2
Post-traumatic growth in cancer survivors: What is its extent and what are important determinants?癌症幸存者的创伤后成长:其程度如何以及重要的决定因素有哪些?
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2024 Jan-Mar;24(1):100418. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100418. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
3
Effectiveness of a guided online primary care intervention for fear of cancer recurrence: A randomised controlled trial.
一项针对癌症复发恐惧的在线初级保健引导干预措施的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Psychooncology. 2023 Dec;32(12):1839-1847. doi: 10.1002/pon.6231. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
4
Towards a Stepped Care Model for Managing Fear of Cancer Recurrence or Progression in Cancer Survivors.迈向癌症幸存者癌症复发或进展恐惧管理的逐步护理模式。
Cancer Manag Res. 2021 Dec 1;13:8953-8965. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S294114. eCollection 2021.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
6
Fear of cancer recurrence among young adult cancer survivors-exploring long-term contributing factors in a large, population-based cohort.青年癌症幸存者对癌症复发的恐惧——在一个大型基于人群的队列中探索长期的促成因素。
J Cancer Surviv. 2021 Aug;15(4):497-508. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00943-2. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
Prevalence and factors associated with fear of recurrence in a mixed sample of young adults with cancer.癌症青年患者混合样本中复发恐惧的流行情况及相关因素。
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Dec;13(6):842-851. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00802-9. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
8
Fear of cancer recurrence: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis of patients' experiences.癌症复发恐惧:患者体验的定性系统评价和元综合。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2019 Mar;68:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
9
From normal response to clinical problem: definition and clinical features of fear of cancer recurrence.从正常反应到临床问题:癌症复发恐惧的定义与临床特征
Support Care Cancer. 2016 Aug;24(8):3265-8. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3272-5. Epub 2016 May 12.
10
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.