• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

达到成人急性哮喘最佳实践资费标准护理与30天和90天再入院之间的关联:全国队列研究

Association between meeting adult acute asthma best practice tariff standard of care and 30 day and 90 day hospital readmission: nationwide cohort study.

作者信息

Adamson Alexander, Dodd James, Wilkinson Thomas, Calvert James M, Nava George W, Van Geffen Peter, Quint Jennifer K

机构信息

School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Academic Respiratory Unit, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Med. 2025 Aug 4;4(1):e001398. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001398. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001398
PMID:40766749
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12323527/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether meeting the NHS best practice tariff standard of care and its constituent elements for hospital admission of adults with acute asthma in England is associated with reduced 30 day and 90 day readmission to hospital.

DESIGN

Nationwide cohort study.

SETTING

Secondary care in England, based on data collected from the 2022-23 National Respiratory Audit Programme adult asthma audit, linked with data from Hospital Episode Statistics, 1 April 2022 to 30 June 2023.

PARTICIPANTS

12 964 patients from 151 hospitals admitted with acute asthma to hospitals in England that took part in the National Respiratory Audit Programme and had their data entered, who were eligible for linkage with Hospital Episode Statistics data, were recorded as male or female sex, and were alive at discharge.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

30 and 90 day hospital readmission for asthma or any cause. Association between readmission and meeting best practice tariff standard of care and its constituent elements, adjusted for potential confounders and including a clustering effect for hospital.

RESULTS

3627 (28.0%) patients were documented as having received the best practice tariff standard of care (a respiratory specialist review within 24 hours of admission and a discharge bundle with key good practice elements). 538 (4.1%) and 1077 (8.3%) patients were readmitted to hospital with asthma within 30 and 90 days, respectively. Receiving best practice tariff standard of care was not associated with either readmission (30 day asthma readmission adjusted odds ratio 0.88 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 1.08); 90 day adjusted odds ratio 1.01 (0.87 to 1.17)), and nor was receiving a respiratory specialist review within 24 hours of arrival (30 day adjusted odds ratio 0.92 (0.76 to 1.10); 90 day adjusted odds ratio 1.01 (0.89 to 1.16)). Receiving a discharge bundle was associated with reduced readmission (30 day adjusted odds ratio 0.61 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.75), number needed to treat 68; 90 day adjusted odds ratio 0.77 (0.65 to 0.89), number needed to treat 67), as was receiving a respiratory specialist review at any point (30 day adjusted odds ratio 0.70 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.89), number needed to treat 75). 79.5% of participants who received a respiratory specialist review received a discharge bundle (8596/10 816) compared with 19.4% of those who did not receive a specialist review (417/2148).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, components of the adult asthma discharge bundle were associated with reduced readmission to hospital for asthma. Best practice tariffs should be evidence based to improve quality of care and patient outcomes.

摘要

目的

评估达到英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)针对英格兰成年急性哮喘患者住院治疗的最佳实践收费标准及其构成要素,是否与30天和90天再入院率降低相关。

设计

全国队列研究。

背景

基于2022 - 23年国家呼吸审计项目成人哮喘审计收集的数据,以及2022年4月1日至2023年6月30日医院事件统计数据,对英格兰二级医疗进行研究。

参与者

来自151家医院的12964例因急性哮喘入院的患者,这些医院参与了国家呼吸审计项目并录入了数据,符合与医院事件统计数据关联条件,记录了性别,出院时存活。

主要结局指标

哮喘或任何原因导致的30天和90天再入院。再入院与达到最佳实践收费标准及其构成要素之间的关联,对潜在混杂因素进行校正,并纳入医院聚类效应。

结果

3627例(28.0%)患者被记录为接受了最佳实践收费标准的治疗(入院后24小时内进行呼吸专科评估以及包含关键良好实践要素的出院综合方案)。分别有538例(4.1%)和1077例(8.3%)患者在30天和90天内因哮喘再次入院。接受最佳实践收费标准的治疗与再入院均无关联(30天哮喘再入院校正比值比0.88(95%置信区间(CI)0.71至1.08);90天校正比值比1.01(0.87至1.17)),入院后24小时内接受呼吸专科评估也无关联(30天校正比值比0.92(0.76至1.10);90天校正比值比1.01(0.89至1.16))。接受出院综合方案与再入院率降低相关(30天校正比值比0.61(95%CI 0.50至0.75),需治疗人数68;90天校正比值比0.77(0.65至0.89),需治疗人数67),在任何时间接受呼吸专科评估也相关(30天校正比值比0.70(95%CI 0.55至0.89),需治疗人数75)。接受呼吸专科评估的参与者中有79.5%接受了出院综合方案(8596/10816),而未接受专科评估的参与者中这一比例为19.4%(417/2148)。

结论

在本研究中,成人哮喘出院综合方案的组成部分与哮喘再入院率降低相关。最佳实践收费标准应以证据为基础,以提高医疗质量和患者结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4242/12323527/1da01a3b59e2/bmjmed-4-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4242/12323527/9f67eb4b18a0/bmjmed-4-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4242/12323527/1da01a3b59e2/bmjmed-4-1-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4242/12323527/9f67eb4b18a0/bmjmed-4-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4242/12323527/1da01a3b59e2/bmjmed-4-1-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between meeting adult acute asthma best practice tariff standard of care and 30 day and 90 day hospital readmission: nationwide cohort study.达到成人急性哮喘最佳实践资费标准护理与30天和90天再入院之间的关联:全国队列研究
BMJ Med. 2025 Aug 4;4(1):e001398. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001398. eCollection 2025.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Antibiotics for exacerbations of asthma.用于哮喘加重期的抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD002741. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002741.pub2.
4
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
5
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
6
Combination formoterol and budesonide as maintenance and reliever therapy versus current best practice (including inhaled steroid maintenance), for chronic asthma in adults and children.福莫特罗与布地奈德联合用于成人和儿童慢性哮喘的维持和缓解治疗与当前最佳实践(包括吸入性糖皮质激素维持治疗)的对比研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD007313. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007313.pub3.
7
Sex as a prognostic factor for mortality in adults with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.性别作为急性症状性肺栓塞成年患者死亡率的一个预后因素。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD013835. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013835.pub2.
8
Supported self-management for patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): an evidence synthesis and economic analysis.中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的支持性自我管理:证据综合与经济分析
Health Technol Assess. 2015 May;19(36):1-516. doi: 10.3310/hta19360.
9
Outcomes of specialist physiotherapy for functional motor disorder: the Physio4FMD RCT.功能性运动障碍专科物理治疗的效果:Physio4FMD随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(34):1-28. doi: 10.3310/MKAC9495.
10
Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal for the treatment of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure: the REST RCT.体外二氧化碳清除治疗急性低氧性呼吸衰竭:REST随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(33):1-16. doi: 10.3310/GJDM0320.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for asthma-related hospital and intensive care admissions in children, adolescents and adults: a cohort study using primary and secondary care data.哮喘相关住院和重症监护入院的风险因素:一项利用初级和二级医疗数据的队列研究。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2024 May 1;11(1):e001746. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2023-001746.
2
Pay-for-performance and patient safety in acute care: A systematic review.按效付费与急性护理中的患者安全:系统评价。
Health Policy. 2024 May;143:105051. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105051. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
3
Impact of reimbursement systems on patient care - a systematic review of systematic reviews.
报销制度对患者护理的影响——系统评价的系统综述
Health Econ Rev. 2024 Mar 16;14(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13561-024-00487-6.
4
Implementing an Evidence-Based COPD Hospital Discharge Protocol: A Narrative Review and Expert Recommendations.实施基于证据的 COPD 医院出院方案:叙述性综述和专家建议。
Adv Ther. 2023 Oct;40(10):4236-4263. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02609-8. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
5
The Global Asthma Report 2022.《2022年全球哮喘报告》
Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2022 Nov 25;26(Supp 1):1-104. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.22.1010.
6
Combined impact of Medicare's hospital pay for performance programs on quality and safety outcomes is mixed.医疗保险的医院绩效支付计划对质量和安全结果的综合影响喜忧参半。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 28;22(1):958. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08348-w.
7
Does pay-for-performance improve patient outcomes in acute exacerbation of COPD admissions?按效付费是否能改善 COPD 急性加重入院患者的预后?
Thorax. 2022 Mar;77(3):239-246. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-216880. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
8
Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.204 个国家和地区 1990-2019 年 369 种疾病和伤害导致的全球负担:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的系统分析。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 17;396(10258):1204-1222. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9.
9
Pay for performance for hospitals.医院绩效付费。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 5;7(7):CD011156. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011156.pub2.
10
Effects of pay for performance on risk incidence of infection and of revision after total knee arthroplasty in type 2 diabetic patients: A nationwide matched cohort study.按绩效付费对 2 型糖尿病患者全膝关节置换术后感染和翻修风险发生率的影响:一项全国性匹配队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0206797. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206797. eCollection 2018.