Carman Angela, Grospitch Ashley, Pendergrass Mary Elizabeth
University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY, United States.
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 23;13:1621156. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1621156. eCollection 2025.
Community engagement processes, specifically when initiated or led by public health researchers/academics often take the form of "outreach," wherein the academic contacts a community experiencing a public health problem to perform a research study about the problem, or "consultation," where the academic content expert is called on by a community to share what is known about a particular public health problem. Both of these forms of community engagement and those involving the public health academic/researcher have the potential to provide elements of community health improvement to the citizens in the community. Consider public health academic approaches to community engagement grounded in research models such as Community-Based Participatory Research, Implementation Research, and Team Science. Each of these models and strategies through which public health academics engage with communities have been widely used with many documented successful conclusions. However, based on work by the authors in communities across Kentucky over the past 10 + years, the possibility exists that specifically in rural communities with multiple public health issues and the frequent existence of a fractured public health infrastructure, another form of community engagement is needed for even better health improvement results. Although many Local Health Departments across the United States serve rural communities, only a small proportion of their directors have a formal public health education. With the increasing public health concerns of many areas, specifically those in rural areas like the majority of communities in Kentucky, the strain on the LHD staff and members of their community partner systems is great. From this perspective, the authors propose that the missing link in the previously discussed community engagement methods of outreach, consultation, and collaboration is support service delivery. Support service delivery, as we propose, would be delivered in a similar mechanism to preceptor guided training in certain health disciplines in which the expert demonstrates, teaches, and supports until the student is ready to practice alone. Through the support service delivery process, trust is built and sustained within communities as an essential component of public health academic community engagement.
社区参与过程,特别是由公共卫生研究人员/学者发起或主导时,通常采取“外展”形式,即学者联系面临公共卫生问题的社区以开展关于该问题的研究,或者“咨询”形式,即社区邀请学术内容专家分享关于特定公共卫生问题的已知信息。这两种社区参与形式以及涉及公共卫生学者/研究人员的形式都有可能为社区中的公民提供改善社区健康的要素。考虑基于社区参与性研究、实施研究和团队科学等研究模型的公共卫生学术社区参与方法。公共卫生学者与社区互动的这些模型和策略中的每一种都已被广泛使用,并取得了许多有记录的成功成果。然而,根据作者在肯塔基州各地社区过去十余年的工作,特别是在存在多个公共卫生问题且公共卫生基础设施经常支离破碎的农村社区,可能需要另一种社区参与形式才能取得更好的健康改善效果。尽管美国许多地方卫生部门为农村社区服务,但其主任中只有一小部分接受过正规的公共卫生教育。随着许多地区,特别是像肯塔基州大多数社区那样的农村地区对公共卫生的关注度不断提高,地方卫生部门工作人员及其社区伙伴系统成员面临的压力很大。从这个角度来看,作者提出,之前讨论的外展、咨询和合作等社区参与方法中缺失的环节是支持服务的提供。正如我们所提议的,支持服务的提供将以类似于某些卫生学科中导师指导培训的机制进行,即专家进行示范、教学并提供支持,直到学生准备好独立实践。通过支持服务提供过程,在社区内建立并维持信任,这是公共卫生学术社区参与的一个重要组成部分。