• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临时公共卫生伙伴关系中的信任建设:对新冠病毒测试、追踪和保护服务伙伴关系形成过程的定性研究。

Trust-building in temporary public health partnerships: a qualitative study of the partnership formation process of a Covid-19 test, trace and protect service.

机构信息

Department for Economy and Health, University of Continuing Education Krems, Krems, Austria.

Employee Wellbeing Service, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Caerleon, UK.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 13;24(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10930-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-10930-3
PMID:38614970
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11015697/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public health initiatives require coordinated efforts from healthcare, social services and other service providers. Organisational theory tells us that trust is essential for reaching collaborative effectiveness. This paper explores the drivers for initiating and sustaining trust in a temporary public health partnership, in response to a sudden health threat.

METHODS

This qualitative study analysed the formation process of a multisector partnership for a Covid-19 contact tracing service. Data was collected through 12 interviews, two focus groups, one feedback workshop, and an online survey with workforce members from all seven partner organisations. Purposive maximum variation sampling was used to capture the reflections and experiences of workforce members from all seven partner organisations. A deductive code scheme was used to identify drivers for building and sustaining trust in inter-organisational collaboration.

RESULTS

Relational mechanisms emanating from the commitment to the common aim, shared norms and values, and partnership structures affected trust-building. Shared values and the commitment to the common aim appeared to channel partners' behaviour when interacting, resulting in being perceived as a fair, reliable and supportive partner. Shared values were congruent with the design of the partnership in terms of governance structure and communication lines reflecting flat hierarchies and shared decision-making power. Tensions between partner organisations arose when shared values were infringed.

CONCLUSIONS

When managing trust in a collaboration, partners should consider structural components like governance structure, organisational hierarchy, and communication channels to ensure equal power distribution. Job rotation, recruitment of candidates with the desired personality traits and attitudes, as well as training and development, encourage inter-organisational networking among employees, which is essential for building and strengthening relationships with partner organisations. Partners should also be aware of managing relational dynamics, channelling behaviours through shared values, objectives and priorities and fostering mutual support and equality among partner organisations.

摘要

背景

公共卫生举措需要医疗保健、社会服务和其他服务提供者共同努力。组织理论告诉我们,信任对于实现协作效果至关重要。本文探讨了在应对突发健康威胁时,临时公共卫生伙伴关系中建立和维持信任的驱动因素。

方法

本定性研究分析了为新冠病毒接触者追踪服务建立多部门伙伴关系的形成过程。通过对来自所有七个合作伙伴组织的工作人员进行 12 次访谈、两次焦点小组讨论、一次反馈研讨会和一次在线调查,收集了数据。采用目的性最大差异抽样,以捕获来自所有七个合作伙伴组织的工作人员的反思和经验。使用演绎代码方案来确定在组织间合作中建立和维持信任的驱动因素。

结果

源于对共同目标的承诺、共同规范和价值观以及伙伴关系结构的关系机制影响了信任的建立。共同价值观和对共同目标的承诺似乎引导了合作伙伴在互动时的行为,使他们被视为公平、可靠和支持性的合作伙伴。共同价值观与伙伴关系的设计在治理结构和沟通渠道方面是一致的,反映了扁平化的层级结构和共同决策权。当共同价值观受到侵犯时,合作伙伴组织之间就会出现紧张关系。

结论

在管理合作中的信任时,合作伙伴应考虑治理结构、组织层级和沟通渠道等结构性因素,以确保权力的平等分配。岗位轮换、招聘具有理想个性特征和态度的候选人,以及培训和发展,鼓励员工之间的组织间网络,这对于建立和加强与合作伙伴组织的关系至关重要。合作伙伴还应注意管理关系动态,通过共同价值观、目标和优先事项引导行为,并在合作伙伴组织之间促进相互支持和平等。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/11015697/3493b45f570c/12913_2024_10930_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/11015697/3493b45f570c/12913_2024_10930_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df31/11015697/3493b45f570c/12913_2024_10930_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Trust-building in temporary public health partnerships: a qualitative study of the partnership formation process of a Covid-19 test, trace and protect service.临时公共卫生伙伴关系中的信任建设:对新冠病毒测试、追踪和保护服务伙伴关系形成过程的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 13;24(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10930-3.
2
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
3
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
4
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
5
Technology-enabled CONTACT tracing in care homes in the COVID-19 pandemic: the CONTACT non-randomised mixed-methods feasibility study.新冠疫情期间养老院中基于技术的接触者追踪:CONTACT非随机混合方法可行性研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(24):1-24. doi: 10.3310/UHDN6497.
6
Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study.社区第一响应者在当前和未来农村卫生和保健劳动力中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(18):1-101. doi: 10.3310/JYRT8674.
7
Effects of consumers and health providers working in partnership on health services planning, delivery and evaluation.消费者和医疗服务提供者合作对卫生服务规划、提供和评估的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 15;9(9):CD013373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013373.pub2.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing the public health academic's role in community engagement: building trusting relationships through support service delivery.加强公共卫生学者在社区参与中的作用:通过提供支持服务建立信任关系。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 23;13:1621156. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1621156. eCollection 2025.
2
The role of the Chief Health Strategist in community health improvement: a MAPP 2.0 counterproposal.首席健康策略师在社区健康改善中的作用:一份MAPP 2.0反提案。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 9;13:1601406. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1601406. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Lessons learnt from the implementation of new models of care delivery through alliance governance in the Southern health region of New Zealand: a qualitative study.通过联盟治理在新西兰南部卫生区域实施新的护理提供模式的经验教训:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Oct 31;12(10):e065635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065635.
2
Why Resilience in Health Care Systems is More than Coping with Disasters: Implications for Health Care Policy.为何医疗保健系统的恢复力不止于应对灾难:对医疗保健政策的启示
Schmalenbach Z Betriebswirtsch Forsch. 2022;74(4):465-495. doi: 10.1007/s41471-022-00132-0. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
3
When trust, confidence, and faith collide: refining a realist theory of how and why inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work.
当信任、信心和信念碰撞时:完善一个现实主义理论,解释和说明医疗保健领域中的组织间合作如何及为何奏效。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jun 26;21(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06630-x.
4
The impacts of collaboration between local health care and non-health care organizations and factors shaping how they work: a systematic review of reviews.本地医疗保健和非医疗保健组织之间合作的影响以及影响它们合作方式的因素:系统评价综述。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Apr 19;21(1):753. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10630-1.
5
Why do some inter-organisational collaborations in healthcare work when others do not? A realist review.为什么有些医疗保健领域的组织间合作能够成功,而有些则不能?一项现实主义综述。
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 22;10(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01630-8.
6
What components are important for effective healthcare alliance governance? Findings from a modified Delphi study in New Zealand.有效的医疗保健联盟治理需要哪些要素?新西兰一项改良德尔菲研究的结果。
Health Policy. 2021 Feb;125(2):239-245. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.12.012. Epub 2020 Dec 27.
7
Defining and classifying public health systems: a critical interpretive synthesis.定义和分类公共卫生系统:批判性综合解读。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Jun 16;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00583-z.
8
Implementing major system change in specialist cancer surgery: The role of provider networks.在专科癌症手术中实施重大制度变革:供应商网络的作用。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2021 Jan;26(1):4-11. doi: 10.1177/1355819620926553. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
9
Complex programme evaluation of a 'new care model' vanguard: a shared commitment to quality improvement in an integrated health and care context.“新护理模式”前沿的复杂项目评估:在整合型卫生与护理环境中对质量改进的共同承诺。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 8;10(3):e029174. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029174.
10
Organizing for sustainable inter-organizational collaboration in health care processes.组织可持续的医疗流程中的组织间协作。
J Interprof Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;34(2):241-250. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2019.1638760. Epub 2019 Jul 22.