• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亲子共读的挑战与促进因素:一项系统综述与元综合分析

Parent-child shared book reading challenges and facilitators: a systematic review and meta synthesis.

作者信息

Nan Jiaopeng, Tian Yin

机构信息

Institute of Education Sciences XianYang Normal University, Xianyang, China.

Department of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 21;16:1635956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1635956. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1635956
PMID:40771333
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12326312/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Parent-child shared book reading is a foundational activity that supports children's literacy development, including language skills, cognitive growth, and social-emotional competencies. Despite its recognized benefits, various factors influence the consistency and quality of shared reading practices across different families and communities. This meta-synthesis aimed to comprehensively explore Parent-child shared book reading challenges and facilitators, drawing on qualitative research evidence.

METHODS

A systematic search of nine electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Medline, Embase, ScienceDirect, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar) was conducted in January 2025. Inclusion criteria focused on qualitative studies examining parent-child shared reading experiences among families with children under 18 years old. Studies were appraised for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist. Data from selected studies were extracted and analyzed using thematic synthesis, with an inductive coding process conducted through MAXQDA 24 software.

RESULTS

The analysis identified two main categories-facilitators and challenges-with ten first and 31 s categories. Facilitators included enhancing access to books and reading opportunities, providing parental support and education, creating positive and enjoyable reading experiences, ensuring high-quality book content, fostering child development through moral, social, and cognitive learning, and strengthening parental motivation. Challenges encompassed limited resources and access, sociocultural and parental barriers such as time constraints and mental health difficulties, gaps in parental knowledge and skills, and engagement challenges related to child readiness and the use of digital books. The synthesis highlighted the dynamic interplay between individual, family, and environmental factors influencing shared reading practices.

CONCLUSION

Parent-child shared book reading is a complex, dynamic practice influenced by social, cultural, and psychological factors. Strengthening access to books, supporting parents with targeted education, and fostering enjoyable reading experiences can significantly enhance shared reading practices. Future studies should broaden cultural representation, explore digital formats, and address parental mental health to develop effective, inclusive strategies that promote early literacy and strong parent-child bonds.

摘要

背景

亲子共读是一项基础性活动,有助于儿童的读写能力发展,包括语言技能、认知成长和社会情感能力。尽管其益处已得到认可,但各种因素会影响不同家庭和社区中亲子共读实践的连贯性和质量。本综合分析旨在利用定性研究证据,全面探究亲子共读的挑战与促进因素。

方法

2025年1月对九个电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Medline、Embase、ScienceDirect、CINAHL、PsycINFO和谷歌学术)进行了系统检索。纳入标准侧重于对18岁以下儿童家庭中亲子共读经历进行研究的定性研究。使用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)清单对研究的方法质量进行评估。从选定研究中提取数据,并使用主题综合法进行分析,通过MAXQDA 24软件进行归纳编码。

结果

分析确定了两个主要类别——促进因素和挑战——分别包含十个一级类别和31个二级类别。促进因素包括增加书籍获取和阅读机会、提供家长支持与教育、创造积极愉快的阅读体验、确保高质量的书籍内容、通过道德、社会和认知学习促进儿童发展以及增强家长积极性。挑战包括资源和获取机会有限、社会文化和家长障碍(如时间限制和心理健康问题)、家长知识和技能差距以及与儿童准备情况和电子书使用相关的参与挑战。综合分析突出了影响共读实践的个人、家庭和环境因素之间的动态相互作用。

结论

亲子共读是一项受社会、文化和心理因素影响的复杂、动态实践。加强书籍获取、通过有针对性的教育支持家长以及培养愉快的阅读体验可显著提升共读实践。未来的研究应扩大文化代表性、探索数字形式并关注家长心理健康,以制定促进早期读写能力和牢固亲子关系的有效、包容性策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12326312/851592bec28b/fpsyg-16-1635956-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12326312/851592bec28b/fpsyg-16-1635956-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e616/12326312/851592bec28b/fpsyg-16-1635956-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Parent-child shared book reading challenges and facilitators: a systematic review and meta synthesis.亲子共读的挑战与促进因素:一项系统综述与元综合分析
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 21;16:1635956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1635956. eCollection 2025.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.
5
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
6
The experiences of family members in the year following the diagnosis of a child or adolescent with cancer: a qualitative systematic review.儿童或青少年癌症诊断后一年内家庭成员的经历:一项定性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jun 12;13(5):293-329. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1698.
7
Parent training interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years.针对5至18岁儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD003018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003018.pub3.
8
Factors that influence caregivers' and adolescents' views and practices regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescents: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响照顾者和青少年对青少年人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种的看法及做法的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Apr 15;4(4):CD013430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013430.pub2.
9
Gender differences in the context of interventions for improving health literacy in migrants: a qualitative evidence synthesis.移民健康素养提升干预措施背景下的性别差异:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 12;12(12):CD013302. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013302.pub2.
10
Neonatal Nurses' Understanding of the Factors That Enhance and Hinder Early Communication Between Preterm Infants and Their Parents: A Narrative Inquiry Study.新生儿护士对促进和阻碍早产儿与其父母早期沟通因素的理解:一项叙事探究研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;60(4):e70093. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.70093.

本文引用的文献

1
Beliefs and Motivations Regarding Early Shared Reading of Parents From Low-Income Households: A Qualitative Study.关于低收入家庭父母早期共同阅读的信念和动机:一项定性研究。
Acad Pediatr. 2024 Apr;24(3):486-493. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2024.01.018. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
2
Exploring the impact of a co-designed shared book reading environment for families in a community hub.探索在社区中心为家庭设计共同的共享阅读环境的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 Jul-Aug;59(4):1371-1385. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.13002. Epub 2024 Jan 8.
3
Co-designing a shared book reading environment at a community hub.
在社区中心共同设计共享阅读环境。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Jun;25(3):376-387. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2023.2182742. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
4
A shared reading intervention: Changing perceptions of caregivers in a semi-rural township.共享阅读干预:改变半农村乡镇看护人观念。
S Afr J Commun Disord. 2023 Jan 26;70(1):e1-e9. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v70i1.948.
5
The Importance of Embodiment and Agency in Parents' Positive Attitudes Towards Shared Reading with Their Children.具身性和能动性在父母对与孩子共同阅读的积极态度中的重要性。
Early Child Educ J. 2022 Nov 19:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s10643-022-01415-1.
6
Shared Book Reading Intervention for Parents of Infants and Toddlers.针对婴幼儿家长的共享图书阅读干预措施
J Early Child Res. 2022 Sep;20(3):322-340. doi: 10.1177/1476718x221091462. Epub 2022 May 4.
7
Children simultaneously learn multiple dimensions of information during shared book reading.孩子们在共读绘本的过程中同时学习多个维度的信息。
J Cogn Dev. 2021;22(5):744-766. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2021.1939353. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
8
Early Shared Reading, Socioeconomic Status, and Children's Cognitive and School Competencies: Six Years of Longitudinal Evidence.早期共享阅读、社会经济地位与儿童的认知及学业能力:六年纵向研究证据
Sci Stud Read. 2018;22(6):485-502. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2018.1482901. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
9
The Impact of Interactive Shared Book Reading on Children's Language Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial.互动式共享绘本阅读对儿童语言技能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Jun 22;63(6):1878-1897. doi: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00288. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
10
Unique contribution of shared book reading on adult-child language interaction.共享阅读对成人-儿童语言互动的独特贡献。
J Child Lang. 2021 Mar;48(2):373-386. doi: 10.1017/S0305000920000331. Epub 2020 Jun 11.