• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理教育中学习偏好的映射:Z 世代学生的横断面研究

Mapping learning preferences in nursing education: A cross-sectional study among generation Z students.

作者信息

Raghavan Divya, Amirtharaj Anandhi Deva

机构信息

Maternal and Child Health Department, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.

Adult Health and Critical Care Department, College of Nursing, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Jul 4;14:261. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1629_24. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1629_24
PMID:40772098
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12327707/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The emergence of COVID-19 has revolutionized the instructional strategies practiced in the education system with the sudden dominance of E-learning strategies that broke the myths of impossible online modes of teaching. The main Aim of the study was to investigate the learning styles preferences and its impact among the generation Z nursing students on their academic success.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this cross-sectional descriptive survey design, 249 nursing students were selected from a university in the Sultanate of Oman. Data was collected from February 2021 until September 2021 using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire about printed and digital resources. Descriptive statistical analysis using mean, median, standard deviation, and analytical statistics using ANOVA and Pearson's correlation at < 0.0.5 was applied.

RESULTS

The study participants indicated 70.7% as female students, with the majority of students (75.1%) spending between less than one hour and up to 3 hours per day and with (61.4%) of students preferring printed materials over onscreen for academic purposes. Among the digital devices, Laptops (41.8%) remain the most preferred device. 49.8% of students reported reading hard copies as easier in comparison to the 32.5% for onscreen reading. A significant positive correlation was observed between gender and hard-copy textbook preference (0.264, = 0.000) and between choice of reading for academic purposes and preference to read hard-copy textbooks (0.264, = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, understanding and addressing diverse learning styles is essential for policymakers and educators to foster effective education systems to identify a responsive approach to learning style to improve educational outcomes in this dynamic world.

摘要

背景

新冠疫情的出现彻底改变了教育系统中所采用的教学策略,电子学习策略突然占据主导地位,打破了在线教学不可能实现的神话。本研究的主要目的是调查Z世代护理专业学生的学习风格偏好及其对学业成绩的影响。

材料与方法

对于这项横断面描述性调查设计,从阿曼苏丹国的一所大学选取了249名护理专业学生。2021年2月至2021年9月期间,使用一份关于印刷资源和数字资源的五点李克特量表问卷收集数据。应用了使用均值、中位数、标准差的描述性统计分析,以及使用方差分析和皮尔逊相关性(<0.05)的分析性统计。

结果

研究参与者表明女生占70.7%,大多数学生(75.1%)每天花费不到一小时至最多3小时,并且61.4%的学生出于学术目的更喜欢印刷材料而非屏幕材料。在数字设备中,笔记本电脑(41.8%)仍然是最受欢迎的设备。49.8%的学生报告称阅读纸质版更容易,相比之下,屏幕阅读的比例为32.5%。观察到性别与纸质版教科书偏好之间存在显著正相关(0.264,=0.000),以及出于学术目的的阅读选择与阅读纸质版教科书的偏好之间存在显著正相关(0.264,=0.000)。

结论

总之,对于政策制定者和教育工作者来说,理解和应对多样化的学习风格对于构建有效的教育系统至关重要,以便在这个动态的世界中确定一种适应学习风格的响应式方法来提高教育成果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a1d/12327707/8adccf4f345d/JEHP-14-261-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a1d/12327707/c243c03ff0cf/JEHP-14-261-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a1d/12327707/64691b0a419a/JEHP-14-261-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a1d/12327707/4146e673e864/JEHP-14-261-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a1d/12327707/c3b5274efc79/JEHP-14-261-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a1d/12327707/8adccf4f345d/JEHP-14-261-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a1d/12327707/c243c03ff0cf/JEHP-14-261-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a1d/12327707/64691b0a419a/JEHP-14-261-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a1d/12327707/4146e673e864/JEHP-14-261-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a1d/12327707/c3b5274efc79/JEHP-14-261-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6a1d/12327707/8adccf4f345d/JEHP-14-261-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Mapping learning preferences in nursing education: A cross-sectional study among generation Z students.护理教育中学习偏好的映射:Z 世代学生的横断面研究
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Jul 4;14:261. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1629_24. eCollection 2025.
2
Debunking learning styles: analyzing key predictors of academic success in dental education.揭穿学习风格:分析牙科教育中学术成功的关键预测因素。
Adv Physiol Educ. 2025 Sep 1;49(3):704-711. doi: 10.1152/advan.00060.2025. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
3
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
4
Unrolling the Mat: A Mixed-Methods Study of Yoga Awareness, Perceptions, and Barriers to Daily Practice Among MBBS Students.展开瑜伽垫:一项关于MBBS学生的瑜伽意识、认知及日常练习障碍的混合方法研究
Cureus. 2025 Jul 4;17(7):e87306. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87306. eCollection 2025 Jul.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
7
The effectiveness of using non-traditional teaching methods to prepare student health care professionals for the delivery of mental state examination: a systematic review.使用非传统教学方法培养学生医护专业人员进行精神状态检查的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Aug 14;13(7):177-212. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2263.
8
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
9
"A System That Wasn't Really Optimized for Me": Factors Influencing Autistic University Students' Access to Information.“一个并非真正为我优化的系统”:影响自闭症大学生获取信息的因素
Autism Adulthood. 2025 Apr 3;7(2):171-184. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0139. eCollection 2025 Apr.
10
Perceived stress and coping mechanisms among nursing students during clinical placements in Babcock university, Ilishan-Remo, Ogun state.奥贡州伊莱尚-雷莫市巴布科克大学临床实习期间护理专业学生的感知压力与应对机制
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 10;24(1):900. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03374-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Preferences for printed books versus E-books among university students in a Middle Eastern country.中东某国大学生对纸质书和电子书的偏好
Heliyon. 2023 May 29;9(6):e16776. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16776. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Screen-based behaviour in children is more than meets the eye.儿童的屏幕行为不止于所见。
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2022 Feb 10;64(1):e1-e4. doi: 10.4102/safp.v64i1.5374.
3
Learning styles, preferences and needs of generation Z healthcare students: Scoping review.Z 世代医学生的学习风格、偏好和需求:范围综述。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Nov;57:103247. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103247. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
4
Using an E-learning activity to enhance student nurses' understanding of cognitive impairment.利用电子学习活动增强护生对认知障碍的理解。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan;108:105167. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105167. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
5
Evaluating online learning engagement of nursing students.评估护理专业学生的在线学习投入度。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Sep;104:104985. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104985. Epub 2021 May 26.
6
Learning environments' influence on students' learning experience in an Australian Faculty of Business and Economics.澳大利亚商业与经济学院中学习环境对学生学习体验的影响。
Learn Environ Res. 2022;25(1):271-285. doi: 10.1007/s10984-021-09361-2. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
7
A survey of E-learning methods in nursing and medical education during COVID-19 pandemic in India.印度 COVID-19 大流行期间护理和医学教育中电子学习方法的调查。
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Apr;99:104796. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104796. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
8
Risk factors associated with stress, anxiety, and depression among university undergraduate students.大学生中与压力、焦虑和抑郁相关的风险因素。
AIMS Public Health. 2020 Dec 25;8(1):36-65. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2021004. eCollection 2021.
9
Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review.教学过程中的多媒体工具:一项系统综述。
Heliyon. 2020 Nov 2;6(11):e05312. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312. eCollection 2020 Nov.
10
Social Media Used and Teaching Methods Preferred by Generation Z Students in the Nursing Clinical Learning Environment: A Cross-Sectional Research Study.Z 世代护生临床学习环境中使用的社交媒体和偏好的教学方法:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 9;17(21):8267. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218267.