Ongaro Giulia, Petrocchi Serena, Calvello Mariarosaria, Bonanni Bernardo, Feroce Irene, Pravettoni Gabriella
Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK), New York, NY, USA.
Am J Mens Health. 2025 Jul-Aug;19(4):15579883251343962. doi: 10.1177/15579883251343962. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
Pathogenic variants in the and genes increase the relative and absolute risks of developing breast, ovarian, prostate, and pancreatic cancer. Clinical guidelines recommend cascade screening (CS) to enhance the identification of at-risk relatives. Despite the benefits of CS in facilitating access to appropriate cancer screening and risk-reduction strategies, CS uptake remains relatively low, particularly among at-risk men. Men's decisions regarding CS appear to be driven more by familial rather than individual disease risk, framing the decision as a family duty. Little is known about the motivational factors that could encourage men's participation in CS. This randomized controlled trial aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of two first-person, gain-framed messages in promoting CS intention among at-risk men: one featuring a self-referred narrative (SM) and the other a family-referred narrative (FM). A total of 110 male first-degree relatives of female carriers were randomized into two groups. -tests revealed no significant difference between groups in perceived message quality. Additionally, after controlling for age, the type of message received did not significantly influence participants' levels of intention to undergo CS. These findings highlight the need for further exploration of the complex motivational factors influencing at-risk men's adherence to CS. Future research should consider alternative health communication strategies tailored to different motivational drivers.
BRCA1和BRCA2基因的致病性变异会增加患乳腺癌、卵巢癌、前列腺癌和胰腺癌的相对风险和绝对风险。临床指南推荐进行级联筛查(CS),以加强对高危亲属的识别。尽管CS在促进获得适当的癌症筛查和风险降低策略方面有诸多益处,但CS的接受率仍然相对较低,尤其是在高危男性中。男性对于CS的决策似乎更多地受家族因素而非个人疾病风险驱动,将该决策视为一项家庭责任。对于可能鼓励男性参与CS的动机因素知之甚少。这项随机对照试验旨在评估两条第一人称、获益框架信息在促进高危男性CS意愿方面的有效性:一条以自我推荐的叙述为特色(SM),另一条以家庭推荐的叙述为特色(FM)。总共110名女性BRCA1/2携带者的男性一级亲属被随机分为两组。t检验显示两组在感知信息质量方面没有显著差异。此外,在控制年龄后,所接收信息的类型并未显著影响参与者接受CS的意愿水平。这些发现凸显了进一步探索影响高危男性坚持CS的复杂动机因素的必要性。未来的研究应考虑针对不同动机驱动因素量身定制的替代健康传播策略。