Tuteja Sony, Cayabyab Mari Angelica S, Hoffecker Glenda, Varughese Lisa A, de Dieu Ndayishimiye Jean, Wittner Victoria A, Wang Xingmei, Hatch Rachel, Capozzi Donna, Harr Margaret, Santani Avni, Hakonarson Hakon, Watson Deborah, Gabriel Peter, Doucette Abigail, Massa Ryan, Damjanov Nevena, Reddy Nandi, Oyer Randall, Teitelbaum Ursina R
Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Department of Pharmacy, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Aug;9:e2500086. doi: 10.1200/PO-25-00086. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of implementing pretreatment testing in patients with gastrointestinal cancer and its impact compared with a biobank population.
A prospective, nonrandomized implementation trial of pretreatment testing with preemptive dose reduction was conducted in patients initiating treatment with a fluoropyrimidine (FP, [fluorouracil or capecitabine]) or irinotecan. The primary end point was feasibility, defined as proportion of results available prior to cycle 1 of treatment. Secondarily, occurrence of severe treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), defined as toxicity resulting in hospitalization or emergency department visit, was compared with a biobank population receiving standard dose chemotherapy.
Of the 288 patients prospectively tested, 225 (median age 60.7 years, 54% male, 18% Black, 47% colorectal cancer) received a qualifying chemotherapy. Eight of 11 DPYD variant carriers received an FP and eight of 39 UGT1A1 poor metabolizers received irinotecan. The median test turnaround time was 10 days (IQR, 9-13) with 57.4% of results available before cycle 1. Eleven of 16 (69%) participants with a drug-gene interaction (DGI) had results available before chemotherapy initiation and received pharmacogenetic-recommended dose reductions. Compared with the biobank cohort (n = 229), the prospective DGI group experienced fewer severe TRAEs (38% 65%, = .123), treatment discontinuations (31% 47%, = .356), and treatment modifications (38% 76%, = .028).
Pretreatment testing and dose reduction was feasible, enabling clinicians to make the appropriate chemotherapy dose reductions, reducing occurrence of adverse outcomes. testing is an important precision oncology approach to optimize patient safety.
确定在胃肠道癌患者中实施预处理检测的可行性和有效性,以及与生物样本库人群相比其影响。
对开始接受氟嘧啶(FP,[氟尿嘧啶或卡培他滨])或伊立替康治疗的患者进行了一项前瞻性、非随机的预处理检测及预先剂量减少的实施试验。主要终点是可行性,定义为治疗第1周期前可获得结果的比例。其次,将定义为导致住院或急诊就诊的毒性的严重治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)的发生率与接受标准剂量化疗的生物样本库人群进行比较。
在288例接受前瞻性检测的患者中,225例(中位年龄60.7岁,54%为男性,18%为黑人,47%为结直肠癌)接受了符合条件的化疗。11例二氢嘧啶脱氢酶(DPYD)变异携带者中有8例接受了FP,39例尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖醛酸基转移酶1A1(UGT1A1)代谢不良者中有8例接受了伊立替康。检测周转时间中位数为10天(四分位间距,9 - 13),57.4%的结果在第1周期前可获得。16例(69%)有药物 - 基因相互作用(DGI)的参与者中有11例在化疗开始前获得了结果,并接受了药物遗传学推荐的剂量减少。与生物样本库队列(n = 229)相比,前瞻性DGI组发生的严重TRAEs较少(38%对65%,P = 0.123),治疗中断较少(31%对47%,P = 0.356),治疗调整较少(38%对76%,P = 0.028)。
预处理检测和剂量减少是可行的,使临床医生能够进行适当的化疗剂量减少,减少不良结局的发生。检测是优化患者安全的重要精准肿瘤学方法。