Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Smilow Center for Translational Research, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Bldg. 421 11th Floor, Room 143, Philadelphia, PA, 19104-5158, USA.
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 8;22(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09171-6.
Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for germline variants in the DPYD and UGT1A1 genes can be used to guide fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan dosing, respectively. Despite the known association between PGx variants and chemotherapy toxicity, preemptive testing prior to chemotherapy initiation is rarely performed in routine practice.
We conducted a qualitative study of oncology clinicians to identify barriers to using preemptive PGx testing to guide chemotherapy dosing in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Each participant completed a semi-structured interview informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interviews were analyzed using an inductive content analysis approach.
Participants included sixteen medical oncologists and nine oncology pharmacists from one academic medical center and two community hospitals in Pennsylvania. Barriers to the use of preemptive PGx testing to guide chemotherapy dosing mapped to four CFIR domains: intervention characteristics, outer setting, inner setting, and characteristics of individuals. The most prominent themes included 1) a limited evidence base, 2) a cumbersome and lengthy testing process, and 3) a lack of insurance coverage for preemptive PGx testing. Additional barriers included clinician lack of knowledge, difficulty remembering to order PGx testing for eligible patients, challenges with PGx test interpretation, a questionable impact of preemptive PGx testing on clinical care, and a lack of alternative therapeutic options for some patients found to have actionable PGx variants.
Successful adoption of preemptive PGx-guided chemotherapy dosing in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies will require a multifaceted effort to demonstrate clinical effectiveness while addressing the contextual factors identified in this study.
针对 DPYD 和 UGT1A1 基因种系变异的药物遗传学(PGx)检测可分别用于指导氟嘧啶和伊立替康的剂量。尽管已知 PGx 变异与化疗毒性之间存在关联,但在常规实践中很少在化疗开始前进行预防性 PGx 检测。
我们对肿瘤学临床医生进行了定性研究,以确定在胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者中使用预防性 PGx 检测来指导化疗剂量的障碍。每位参与者都根据综合实施研究框架(CFIR)完成了半结构化访谈。使用归纳内容分析方法对访谈进行了分析。
参与者包括宾夕法尼亚州一家学术医疗中心和两家社区医院的 16 名肿瘤内科医生和 9 名肿瘤药师。使用预防性 PGx 检测来指导化疗剂量的障碍映射到 CFIR 的四个领域:干预特征、外部环境、内部环境和个体特征。最突出的主题包括 1)证据基础有限,2)检测过程繁琐冗长,3)预防性 PGx 检测缺乏保险覆盖。其他障碍包括临床医生缺乏知识、难以记住为符合条件的患者订购 PGx 检测、PGx 测试解释困难、预防性 PGx 检测对临床护理的影响值得怀疑以及一些发现有可操作 PGx 变异的患者缺乏替代治疗选择。
要在胃肠道恶性肿瘤患者中成功采用预防性 PGx 指导的化疗剂量,需要多方努力,既要证明临床有效性,又要解决本研究中确定的背景因素。