• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

第三部门组织对健康与护理生态系统的贡献。

Third Sector Organisations' Contributions to the Health and Care Ecosystem.

作者信息

Tuurnas Sanna, Paananen Henna, Kork Anna-Aurora

机构信息

Faculty of Management and Business, Tampere University, Finland.

School of Management, University of Vaasa, Finland.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2025 Aug 6;25(3):19. doi: 10.5334/ijic.9813. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.5334/ijic.9813
PMID:40778381
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12330809/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In integrated care models, third sector organisations (TSOs) are essential but often undervalued parts of the health and care ecosystem to address care fragmentation and inequity of access. In this study, we illustrate the value contributed by TSOs in a co-production setting.

METHODS

In this qualitative study, frame analysis was used to explore the varied interpretations of TSOs' value contributions at different levels of the ecosystem. The qualitative interview data were collected from 16 informants in the context of a Nordic welfare state, Finland. The interviewees represented a variety of health and care TSOs.

RESULTS

The resulting frames were seen as organising principles that are socially shared. The analysis revealed a threefold interpretative schema of TSOs' value contributions: strengthening the ideals of civil society, advancing the public service system and connecting people to communities.

DISCUSSION

The findings demonstrate that TSOs contribute values in health and care ecosystems at all levels-micro, meso and macro-by integrating short- and long-term policy objectives, ensuring that their actions result in meaningful and sustainable benefits across all levels of the public service ecosystem.

CONCLUSIONS

This study underlines the need to integrate civil society into the health and care ecosystem and, specifically, to acknowledge the holistic contribution of TSOs when developing integrated care models. The key contribution of this study is demonstrating the diverse ways in which TSOs can contribute value for integrated care.

摘要

引言

在综合护理模式中,第三部门组织(TSO)是健康与护理生态系统中不可或缺但往往被低估的部分,有助于解决护理碎片化和获取不平等问题。在本研究中,我们阐述了TSO在共同生产环境中所做出的贡献。

方法

在这项定性研究中,采用框架分析来探讨生态系统不同层面上对TSO价值贡献的各种解读。定性访谈数据收集自北欧福利国家芬兰的16名受访者。受访者代表了各类健康与护理TSO。

结果

所得框架被视为社会共享的组织原则。分析揭示了TSO价值贡献的三重解释模式:强化公民社会理想、推进公共服务体系以及将人们与社区联系起来。

讨论

研究结果表明,TSO通过整合短期和长期政策目标,在健康与护理生态系统的微观、中观和宏观各个层面都做出了贡献,确保其行动在公共服务生态系统的各个层面都能带来有意义且可持续的效益。

结论

本研究强调将公民社会纳入健康与护理生态系统的必要性,特别是在制定综合护理模式时要认可TSO的整体贡献。本研究的关键贡献在于展示了TSO为综合护理贡献价值的多样方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db77/12330809/b2f70d2c8bf6/ijic-25-3-9813-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db77/12330809/68d2769f97e2/ijic-25-3-9813-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db77/12330809/b2f70d2c8bf6/ijic-25-3-9813-g2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db77/12330809/68d2769f97e2/ijic-25-3-9813-g1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db77/12330809/b2f70d2c8bf6/ijic-25-3-9813-g2.jpg

相似文献

1
Third Sector Organisations' Contributions to the Health and Care Ecosystem.第三部门组织对健康与护理生态系统的贡献。
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Aug 6;25(3):19. doi: 10.5334/ijic.9813. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
3
Patient buy-in to social prescribing through link workers as part of person-centred care: a realist evaluation.患者通过联络人员接受社会处方作为以患者为中心的护理的一部分:一项现实主义评价。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 25:1-17. doi: 10.3310/ETND8254.
4
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
5
The consequences of micro-discretions and boundaries in the social prescribing link worker role in England: a realist evaluation.英格兰社会处方联络工作人员角色中微观决策和界限的后果:一项实在论评价
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep 11:1-17. doi: 10.3310/JSQY9840.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
8
Developing a role for patients and the public in the implementation of health and social care research evidence into practice: the PIPER study (Pathways to Implementation for Public Engagement in Research) realist evaluation protocol.让患者和公众在将健康与社会护理研究证据转化为实践中发挥作用:PIPER研究(公众参与研究的实施途径)的实在论评价方案。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 14;11(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00728-w.
9
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
10
Factors that influence parents' and informal caregivers' views and practices regarding routine childhood vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响父母和非正式照顾者对常规儿童疫苗接种看法和做法的因素:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 27;10(10):CD013265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013265.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Transforming Integrated Care Through Co-production: A Systematic Review Using Meta-ethnography.通过共同生产转变综合护理:一项运用元民族志的系统评价
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Mar 8;24(1):17. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7603. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
2
Equity Promoting Integrated Care: Definition and Future Development.促进公平的综合医疗服务:定义与未来发展
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Oct 19;23(4):6. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7614. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
3
Identifying Individuals for Integrated Multidisciplinary Care: Lessons from Finland.确定综合多学科护理的对象:来自芬兰的经验教训。
Int J Integr Care. 2022 Aug 12;22(3):8. doi: 10.5334/ijic.6000. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
4
Collective health research assessment: developing a tool to measure the impact of multistakeholder research initiatives.集体卫生研究评估:开发一种衡量多方利益攸关者研究倡议影响的工具。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 May 2;20(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00856-9.
5
Health system reforms and the needs of the ageing population-an analysis of recent policy paths and reform trends in Finland and Sweden.卫生系统改革与老龄化人口的需求——芬兰和瑞典近期政策路径与改革趋势分析
Eur J Ageing. 2022 Apr 15;19(2):221-232. doi: 10.1007/s10433-022-00699-x. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Values of Integrated Care: A Systematic Review.综合护理的价值:一项系统综述
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Nov 15;18(4):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4172.
7
Buurtzorg: nurse-led community care.博组客:以护士为主导的社区护理。
Creat Nurs. 2013;19(3):122-7.
8
The third sector, user involvement and public service reform: a case study in the co-governance of health service provision.第三部门、用户参与和公共服务改革:医疗服务提供共治的案例研究。
Public Adm. 2011;89(3):909-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01910.x.