Ibrahim Abdullahi Umar, Pwavodi Pwadubashiyi Coston, Oszoz Mehmet, Duwa Basil Barth, Irkham Irkham, Hartati Yeni Wahyuni
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Near East University, Nicosia, Mersin 10, Turkey.
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Kaduna State University, Kaduna, Nigeria.
ADMET DMPK. 2025 Jul 9;13(4):2799. doi: 10.5599/admet.2799. eCollection 2025.
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The world has witnessed several outbreaks, emergence and re-emergence of infectious diseases throughout the 21 century as a result of climate change, urbanization and migration. Several infectious diseases caused by pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2, Ebola, Zika, Dengue, Marburg viruses, , etc. have caused a devastating impact on lives and livelihoods around the world. To counter these diseases, medical experts rely on conventional techniques, which include microscopy and serological testing. However, these conventional methods are hindered by several trade-offs, including high cost, longer processing times, low sensitivity, and a likelihood of false positive results. Biomedical sensors have gained momentum in clinical diagnostics due to their low cost, portability, and sensitivity, among other advantages. To improve their performance, scientists have incorporated nanomaterials. Other techniques used to enhance the performance of nanobiosensors include multiplex testing, point-of-care testing (POCT), and smart sensing. METHODOLOGY: Thus, in this review, we present a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art nanobiosensors for detecting infectious diseases. The review covers key topics that are centred around the application of nanotechnology in biosensing, multiplex testing, POCT and smart nano-enhanced biosensors. FINDINGS: The findings of this review highlighted the advantages of biosensors over conventional approaches, with a limit of detection ranging from nanomolar to attomolar concentrations and a time response ranging from 1 to 3 hours. CONCLUSION: Despite the prospect of nanobiosensors, several limitations exist, including complexity, extensive processing time, and others. Moreover, the integration of smart technologies in nanobiosensors can offer several benefits, including high accuracy and faster detection and prediction.
引言与背景:在21世纪,由于气候变化、城市化和移民,世界见证了多种传染病的爆发、出现和再次出现。由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)、埃博拉病毒、寨卡病毒、登革热病毒、马尔堡病毒等病原体引起的多种传染病,对世界各地的生命和生计造成了毁灭性影响。为了对抗这些疾病,医学专家依赖于传统技术,包括显微镜检查和血清学检测。然而,这些传统方法存在一些权衡问题,包括成本高、处理时间长、灵敏度低以及可能出现假阳性结果。生物医学传感器因其低成本、便携性和灵敏度等优点,在临床诊断中得到了广泛应用。为了提高其性能,科学家们引入了纳米材料。用于提高纳米生物传感器性能的其他技术包括多重检测、即时检测(POCT)和智能传感。 方法:因此,在本综述中,我们全面概述了用于检测传染病的最新纳米生物传感器。该综述涵盖了围绕纳米技术在生物传感、多重检测、即时检测和智能纳米增强生物传感器中的应用的关键主题。 研究结果:本综述的研究结果突出了生物传感器相对于传统方法的优势,其检测限范围从纳摩尔到阿托摩尔浓度,时间响应范围为1至3小时。 结论:尽管纳米生物传感器前景广阔,但仍存在一些局限性,包括复杂性、处理时间长等。此外,在纳米生物传感器中集成智能技术可以带来诸多好处,包括高精度以及更快的检测和预测。
2025-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025-6-30
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-10-14
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024-7-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-7-22
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-12-16
Nanoscale Adv. 2024-5-24
ACS Omega. 2024-5-30
Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2024-4
Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2023-12
Trends Analyt Chem. 2022-12