• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《重症监护病房护士谵妄护理自我效能量表的修订及心理测量学测试》

Revision and Psychometric Testing of the Delirium Care Self-Efficacy Scale for ICU Nurses.

作者信息

Nie Jing, Jiang Zheng-Ying

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, 400030, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Aug 5;18:4665-4673. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S530177. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S530177
PMID:40787145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12335287/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to culturally adapt the Traditional Chinese version of the Delirium Care Self-Efficacy Scale for ICU Nurses (DCSE-I), originally developed in Taiwan, for use in mainland China and to assess its reliability and validity.

METHODS

The revised scale underwent cross-cultural adaptation following expert consultations and a pilot survey. To evaluate its reliability and validity, a survey was conducted among 284 ICU nurses from eight tertiary hospitals in Chongqing.

RESULTS

The Chinese version of the DCSE-I demonstrated strong internal consistency, with an overall Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.934. The item-level content validity index (I-CVI) values ranged from 0.800 to 1.000, and the scale-level content validity index/average (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.923. The split-half reliability was 0.861, while the test-retest reliability reached 0.954. Exploratory factor analysis identified two factors with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 65.522%. These two dimensions were labeled "Confidence in Delirium Assessment" and "Confidence in Delirium Management".

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of the DCSE-I is appropriate for the cultural context of mainland China and exhibits strong reliability and validity.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对最初在台湾开发的《重症监护病房护士谵妄护理自我效能量表》(DCSE-I)的繁体中文版进行文化调适,以适用于中国大陆,并评估其信效度。

方法

修订后的量表经专家咨询和预调查后进行跨文化调适。为评估其信效度,对重庆8家三级医院的284名重症监护病房护士进行了调查。

结果

DCSE-I中文版表现出很强的内部一致性,总体Cronbach's α系数为0.934。条目水平的内容效度指数(I-CVI)值范围为0.800至1.000,量表水平的内容效度指数/平均值(S-CVI/Ave)为0.923。分半信度为0.861,重测信度达到0.954。探索性因素分析确定了两个因素,累积方差贡献率为65.522%。这两个维度分别被标记为“谵妄评估信心”和“谵妄管理信心”。

结论

DCSE-I中文版适用于中国大陆的文化背景,具有很强的信效度。

相似文献

1
Revision and Psychometric Testing of the Delirium Care Self-Efficacy Scale for ICU Nurses.《重症监护病房护士谵妄护理自我效能量表的修订及心理测量学测试》
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Aug 5;18:4665-4673. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S530177. eCollection 2025.
2
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of The Resilience Scale for Kidney Transplantation (RS-KTPL) in a Chinese population.肾移植复原力量表(RS-KTPL)在中国人群中的跨文化调适与验证
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 8;20(7):e0327035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327035. eCollection 2025.
4
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the pros and cons of anorexia nervosa (P-CAN-C) scale: a validation study in patients with anorexia nervosa.神经性厌食症利弊中文版量表(P-CAN-C)的心理测量学特性:一项针对神经性厌食症患者的效度研究
J Eat Disord. 2025 Jun 16;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40337-025-01314-x.
5
Psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the nursing informatics competence scale and analysis of influencing factors.护理信息学能力量表中文版的心理测量学验证及影响因素分析
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 1;24(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03441-x.
6
Psychometric evaluation of the reliability and validity of the literacy of suicide scale among Chinese nurses.中国护士自杀素养量表信效度的心理测量学评价
Front Psychol. 2025 Jun 2;16:1480813. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1480813. eCollection 2025.
7
Establishment of nursing needs scale for elderly patients with urinary incontinence and its reliability and validity test.老年尿失禁患者护理需求量表的编制及其信效度检验
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 24;12:1602675. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1602675. eCollection 2025.
8
Checking the Validity and Reliability of the Delirium-O-Meter Questionnaire in the Persian Language.检验波斯语版谵妄量表问卷的有效性和可靠性。
Iran J Psychiatry. 2024 Oct;19(4):412-423. doi: 10.18502/ijps.v19i4.16554.
9
Development of a Brief Delirium Knowledge Questionnaire for Intensive Care Nurses: A Validity and Reliability Study.为重症监护护士开发简短谵妄知识问卷:效度与信度研究
Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2025;44(5):277-282. doi: 10.1097/DCC.0000000000000714.
10
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the maternity-monitoring scale by parents.父母版中文版孕期监测量表的信效度
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 17;25(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07880-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Validity and Reliability of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory and Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale in Patients Living With Cancer.慢性病自我护理量表和自我护理自我效能量表在癌症患者中的有效性和可靠性
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1111/jan.16823.
2
Effectiveness of Interdisciplinary Simulation Training on the Self-Efficacy and Anxiety of Healthcare Professionals in Managing a Medical Emergency.跨学科模拟培训对医疗保健专业人员应对医疗紧急情况的自我效能感和焦虑情绪的影响。
Hosp Top. 2025 Feb 17:1-8. doi: 10.1080/00185868.2025.2464125.
3
Effectiveness of Simulation with a Standardized Patient on Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Retention, and Self-Efficacy Among Moroccan Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Study.标准化病人模拟对摩洛哥护理专业学生知识获取、知识保留和自我效能的有效性:一项准实验研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 4;13(3):318. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13030318.
4
Nurses' self-efficacy and outcome expectancy in evidence-based practice: Translation, construct validity and internal consistency of the Dutch scales.护士在循证实践中的自我效能感与结果期望:荷兰量表的翻译、结构效度及内部一致性
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Dec 26;8:100286. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100286. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Chinese Version of the High Activity Arthroplasty Score.高活动度关节成形术评分中文版的翻译、跨文化调适及验证
Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2024 Apr 29;15:121-130. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S451710. eCollection 2024.
6
Adherence of critical care nurses to endotracheal suctioning guidelines: a cross-sectional study.重症监护护士对气管内吸痰指南的依从性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Nov 14;21(1):312. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01092-w.
7
Self-efficacy of caring for patients in the intensive care unit with delirium: Development and validation of a scale for intensive care unit nurses.重症监护病房谵妄患者护理自我效能感量表的编制及信效度检验
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Jul;36(4):449-454. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
8
Cognitive Stimulation in an Intensive Care Unit: A Qualitative Evaluation of Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementation.重症监护病房中的认知刺激:实施障碍和促进因素的定性评估。
Crit Care Nurse. 2021 Apr 1;41(2):51-60. doi: 10.4037/ccn2021551.
9
Validation of the Yoruba Version of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.验证慢性腰痛患者使用约鲁巴语版疼痛自我效能问卷的效果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 May 1;46(9):E528-E533. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003870.
10
Prevention and Management of Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit.《重症监护病房谵妄的预防与管理》。
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb;42(1):112-126. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1710572. Epub 2020 Aug 3.