• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非洲草原象和亚洲象在嗅觉辨别能力上存在差异,但在嗅觉敏感度上没有差异。

Differences in Olfactory Discrimination, but Not Sensitivity, Between African Savanna and Asian Elephants.

作者信息

Schmitt Melissa H, Rudolph Matthew S, Jacobson Sarah L, Plotnik Joshua M

机构信息

Department of Biology University of North Dakota Grand Forks North Dakota USA.

School of Biology and Environmental Sciences University of Mpumalanga Nelspruit South Africa.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2025 Aug 11;15(8):e71896. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71896. eCollection 2025 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/ece3.71896
PMID:40791252
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12339044/
Abstract

While African savanna and Asian elephants split between 4.2 and 9 MYA, they are often regarded as one united group, 'elephants.' This is surprising because, while both are keystone species in their respective habitats, each faces different environmental pressures and has rarely been compared experimentally. In general, African savanna elephants must locate resources that vary spatially and temporally across patchy savannas, while Asian elephants do so within dense, high-biodiversity forests. Both species use olfaction to guide decision-making; however, considering their ecologies, we hypothesize that their olfactory abilities differ. Thus, we investigated the sensitivity limits and discrimination abilities of both savanna and Asian elephants' olfactory systems, and changes in these limits in a complex odor environment. We employed two odor-based choice experiments, using -a common green leaf volatile that is emitted by plants globally-as a target odor. While both species correctly detected a target odor, albeit at different concentrations-savanna elephants detected it at 50 parts per million (ppm) and Asian elephants at 100 ppm-only the savanna elephants' limit changed (to 1000 ppm) in the complex odor environment. While we were limited by a small sample size (i.e.,  = 5 for each species), our data suggest that there may be differences in the olfactory abilities of these two elephant species.

摘要

虽然非洲草原象和亚洲象在420万至900万年前就已分化,但它们通常被视为一个统一的群体——“大象”。这很令人惊讶,因为尽管它们在各自的栖息地都是关键物种,但面临着不同的环境压力,而且很少进行实验比较。一般来说,非洲草原象必须在零散的草原上寻找时空上分布各异的资源,而亚洲象则要在茂密、生物多样性高的森林中寻找资源。这两个物种都利用嗅觉来指导决策;然而,考虑到它们的生态环境,我们推测它们的嗅觉能力有所不同。因此,我们研究了草原象和亚洲象嗅觉系统的敏感度极限和辨别能力,以及在复杂气味环境中这些极限的变化。我们采用了两项基于气味的选择实验,使用一种全球植物都会释放的常见绿叶挥发物作为目标气味。虽然两个物种都能正确检测到目标气味,尽管浓度不同——草原象在百万分之50(ppm)时能检测到,亚洲象在百万分之100时能检测到——但只有草原象在复杂气味环境中的极限发生了变化(变为百万分之1000)。尽管我们受到样本量小的限制(即每个物种只有5头),但我们的数据表明这两种象的嗅觉能力可能存在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f8/12339044/fb612d07daaf/ECE3-15-e71896-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f8/12339044/2df70711fa5c/ECE3-15-e71896-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f8/12339044/928a0db0a99a/ECE3-15-e71896-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f8/12339044/fb612d07daaf/ECE3-15-e71896-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f8/12339044/2df70711fa5c/ECE3-15-e71896-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f8/12339044/928a0db0a99a/ECE3-15-e71896-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e5f8/12339044/fb612d07daaf/ECE3-15-e71896-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in Olfactory Discrimination, but Not Sensitivity, Between African Savanna and Asian Elephants.非洲草原象和亚洲象在嗅觉辨别能力上存在差异,但在嗅觉敏感度上没有差异。
Ecol Evol. 2025 Aug 11;15(8):e71896. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71896. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
5
Q-learning with temporal memory to navigate turbulence.基于时间记忆的Q学习以应对动荡。
Elife. 2025 Jul 21;13:RP102906. doi: 10.7554/eLife.102906.
6
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
7
Loss of olfaction reduces caterpillar performance and increases susceptibility to a natural enemy.嗅觉丧失会降低毛虫的生存能力,并增加其对天敌的易感性。
Elife. 2025 Aug 1;14:RP105585. doi: 10.7554/eLife.105585.
8
Clinical symptoms, signs and tests for identification of impending and current water-loss dehydration in older people.老年人即将发生和当前失水脱水的识别的临床症状、体征及检查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 30;2015(4):CD009647. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009647.pub2.
9
Maternal and neonatal outcomes of elective induction of labor.择期引产的母婴结局
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2009 Mar(176):1-257.
10
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍

本文引用的文献

1
The deterrent effects of individual monoterpene odours on the dietary decisions of African elephants.个体单萜气味对非洲象取食决策的驱避作用。
Anim Cogn. 2023 Jun;26(3):1049-1063. doi: 10.1007/s10071-023-01755-4. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
2
The Olfactory Landscape Concept: A Key Source of Past, Present, and Future Information Driving Animal Movement and Decision-making.嗅觉景观概念:驱动动物运动和决策的过去、现在及未来信息的关键来源。
Bioscience. 2022 Jul 6;72(8):745-752. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biac039. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
African elephants can detect water from natural and artificial sources via olfactory cues.
非洲象可以通过嗅觉线索从自然和人工水源中探测到水。
Anim Cogn. 2022 Feb;25(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s10071-021-01531-2. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
4
Sweet tooth: Elephants detect fruit sugar levels based on scent alone.爱吃甜食:大象仅通过气味就能检测水果的糖分水平。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Sep 11;10(20):11399-11407. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6777. eCollection 2020 Oct.
5
Coexistence between wildlife and livestock is contingent on cattle density and season but not differences in body size.野生动物和家畜共存取决于牛的密度和季节,但与体型差异无关。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 31;15(7):e0236895. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236895. eCollection 2020.
6
Elephants have a nose for quantity.大象对数量有嗅觉。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Jun 18;116(25):12566-12571. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1818284116. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
7
Olfactory sensitivity for mold-associated odorants in CD-1 mice and spider monkeys.CD-1 小鼠和蜘蛛猴对霉菌相关气味的嗅觉敏感性。
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2018 Oct;204(9-10):821-833. doi: 10.1007/s00359-018-1285-x. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
8
Health risk assessment of volatile organic compounds exposure near Daegu dyeing industrial complex in South Korea.韩国大邱印染工业复合体附近挥发性有机化合物暴露的健康风险评估。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 20;18(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5454-1.
9
The Enemies Hypothesis: Tritrophic Interactions and Vegetational Diversity in Tropical Agroecosystems.敌害假说:热带农业生态系统中的三级营养相互作用与植被多样性
Ecology. 1987 Dec;68(6):1616-1622. doi: 10.2307/1939853.
10
Identification of an insect-produced olfactory cue that primes plant defenses.鉴定一种引发植物防御的昆虫产生的嗅觉线索。
Nat Commun. 2017 Aug 24;8(1):337. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00335-8.