• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科创伤伤口缝合技术:美容、功能及感染相关结局的系统评价

Suture Techniques for Traumatic Wound Closure in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Cosmetic, Functional, and Infection-Related Outcomes.

作者信息

Elfar Amr, Ahmed Osman Mohamed Asma, Mahdi Ahmed, Ahmed Mohammed Monzir Adam, Shaikh Abdul Mueed, H J Alkhazendar Jarallah, Hamadelniel Alhadi Ibrahim Adil, Alkhazendar Aliaa H, Mohamed Ahmed, Awan Manahil

机构信息

Emergency Medicine, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, GBR.

Surgery, Burjeel Medical City, Abu Dhabi, SAU.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Jul 12;17(7):e87772. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87772. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.87772
PMID:40792329
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12337800/
Abstract

This systematic review aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of alternative wound closure techniques, specifically wound tapes and tissue adhesives, versus traditional suturing in the management of traumatic lacerations in emergency departments. After screening 220 records from databases including PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar, three randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Across the studies, outcomes assessed included wound closure time, infection and dehiscence rates, and cosmetic or scar-related results. The findings indicate that alternative methods such as wound tape and tissue adhesives offer similar, and in some cases improved, cosmetic outcomes and significantly reduced wound closure times compared to sutures, particularly in low-tension or facial wounds. Infection and dehiscence rates were comparable across interventions. The overall quality of the included studies was satisfactory, with two studies rated as low risk of bias. These findings suggest that in select clinical contexts, particularly where time efficiency and patient comfort are priorities, non-suture methods can be a viable alternative without compromising safety or aesthetic outcomes.

摘要

本系统评价旨在评估在急诊科处理外伤性撕裂伤时,与传统缝合相比,替代伤口闭合技术(特别是伤口胶带和组织粘合剂)的相对有效性。在筛选了来自PubMed、Cochrane CENTRAL和谷歌学术等数据库的220条记录后,三项随机对照试验符合纳入标准并进行了分析。在各项研究中,评估的结果包括伤口闭合时间、感染和裂开率以及美容或疤痕相关结果。研究结果表明,与缝线相比,伤口胶带和组织粘合剂等替代方法能提供相似的美容效果,在某些情况下效果更好,且伤口闭合时间显著缩短,尤其是在低张力或面部伤口中。各干预措施的感染和裂开率相当。纳入研究的总体质量令人满意,两项研究被评为低偏倚风险。这些发现表明,在特定临床环境中,特别是在时间效率和患者舒适度是优先考虑因素的情况下,非缝合方法可以是一种可行的替代方案,而不会影响安全性或美学效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e09d/12337800/86e37a783468/cureus-0017-00000087772-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e09d/12337800/86e37a783468/cureus-0017-00000087772-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e09d/12337800/86e37a783468/cureus-0017-00000087772-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Suture Techniques for Traumatic Wound Closure in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Cosmetic, Functional, and Infection-Related Outcomes.急诊科创伤伤口缝合技术:美容、功能及感染相关结局的系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Jul 12;17(7):e87772. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87772. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions.用于手术切口闭合的组织粘合剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD004287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287.pub3.
3
Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions.用于手术切口闭合的组织粘合剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 28;2014(11):CD004287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287.pub4.
4
Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations in children and adults.用于儿童和成人创伤性撕裂伤的组织粘合剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(3):CD003326. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003326.
5
Continuous versus interrupted skin sutures for non-obstetric surgery.非产科手术中连续缝合与间断缝合皮肤的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Feb 14;2014(2):CD010365. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010365.pub2.
6
Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.用于预防切口疝及其他伤口并发症的剖腹手术切口闭合方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2.
7
Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions.用于外科手术切口闭合的组织粘合剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD004287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287.pub2.
8
Early versus delayed dressing removal after primary closure of clean and clean-contaminated surgical wounds.清洁及清洁-污染手术切口一期缝合后早期与延迟拆除敷料的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 5(9):CD010259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010259.pub2.
9
Early versus delayed dressing removal after primary closure of clean and clean-contaminated surgical wounds.清洁及清洁-污染手术切口一期缝合后早期与延迟拆除敷料的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD010259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010259.pub3.
10
Subcutaneous closure versus no subcutaneous closure after non-caesarean surgical procedures.非剖宫产手术术后皮下缝合与不进行皮下缝合的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 21;2014(1):CD010425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010425.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Evaluation of Tissue Adhesives and Sutures in the Management of Facial Laceration Wounds in Children.儿童面部裂伤伤口处理中组织粘合剂与缝线的比较评估
J Pers Med. 2023 Aug 31;13(9):1350. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091350.
2
Liver Trauma: Management in the Emergency Setting and Medico-Legal Implications.肝外伤:急诊处理及法医学意义
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 13;12(6):1456. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12061456.
3
Longitudinal monitoring and prediction of long-term outcome of scar stiffness on pediatric patients.小儿患者瘢痕硬度长期转归的纵向监测与预测
Burns Trauma. 2021 Sep 30;9:tkab028. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkab028. eCollection 2021.
4
Scar quality in children with burns 5-7 years after injury: A cross-sectional multicentre study.烧伤后 5-7 年儿童的瘢痕质量:一项横断面多中心研究。
Wound Repair Regen. 2021 Nov;29(6):951-960. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12953. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
5
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.《PRISMA 2020声明:报告系统评价的更新指南》
Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 29;10(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4.
6
A Prospective Controlled Study on Long-Term Outcomes of Facial Lacerations in Children.一项关于儿童面部裂伤长期预后的前瞻性对照研究。
Front Pediatr. 2021 Feb 12;8:616151. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.616151. eCollection 2020.
7
Tissue Adhesives: From Research to Clinical Translation.组织黏合剂:从研究到临床转化
Nano Today. 2021 Feb;36. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.101049. Epub 2020 Dec 20.
8
A Review of the PubMed PICO Tool: Using Evidence-Based Practice in Health Education.《PubMed PICO 工具述评:在健康教育中运用循证实践》
Health Promot Pract. 2020 Jul;21(4):496-498. doi: 10.1177/1524839919893361. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
9
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
10
Comparison of Leukosan SkinLink with surgical suture for traumatic laceration repair: A randomized controlled trial.Leukosan SkinLink与手术缝线用于外伤性撕裂伤修复的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(25):e10918. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010918.