Elfar Amr, Ahmed Osman Mohamed Asma, Mahdi Ahmed, Ahmed Mohammed Monzir Adam, Shaikh Abdul Mueed, H J Alkhazendar Jarallah, Hamadelniel Alhadi Ibrahim Adil, Alkhazendar Aliaa H, Mohamed Ahmed, Awan Manahil
Emergency Medicine, Aintree University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, GBR.
Surgery, Burjeel Medical City, Abu Dhabi, SAU.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 12;17(7):e87772. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87772. eCollection 2025 Jul.
This systematic review aimed to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of alternative wound closure techniques, specifically wound tapes and tissue adhesives, versus traditional suturing in the management of traumatic lacerations in emergency departments. After screening 220 records from databases including PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar, three randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Across the studies, outcomes assessed included wound closure time, infection and dehiscence rates, and cosmetic or scar-related results. The findings indicate that alternative methods such as wound tape and tissue adhesives offer similar, and in some cases improved, cosmetic outcomes and significantly reduced wound closure times compared to sutures, particularly in low-tension or facial wounds. Infection and dehiscence rates were comparable across interventions. The overall quality of the included studies was satisfactory, with two studies rated as low risk of bias. These findings suggest that in select clinical contexts, particularly where time efficiency and patient comfort are priorities, non-suture methods can be a viable alternative without compromising safety or aesthetic outcomes.
本系统评价旨在评估在急诊科处理外伤性撕裂伤时,与传统缝合相比,替代伤口闭合技术(特别是伤口胶带和组织粘合剂)的相对有效性。在筛选了来自PubMed、Cochrane CENTRAL和谷歌学术等数据库的220条记录后,三项随机对照试验符合纳入标准并进行了分析。在各项研究中,评估的结果包括伤口闭合时间、感染和裂开率以及美容或疤痕相关结果。研究结果表明,与缝线相比,伤口胶带和组织粘合剂等替代方法能提供相似的美容效果,在某些情况下效果更好,且伤口闭合时间显著缩短,尤其是在低张力或面部伤口中。各干预措施的感染和裂开率相当。纳入研究的总体质量令人满意,两项研究被评为低偏倚风险。这些发现表明,在特定临床环境中,特别是在时间效率和患者舒适度是优先考虑因素的情况下,非缝合方法可以是一种可行的替代方案,而不会影响安全性或美学效果。