• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Leukosan SkinLink与手术缝线用于外伤性撕裂伤修复的比较:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of Leukosan SkinLink with surgical suture for traumatic laceration repair: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Kim Hyeongtae, Kim Wonhee, Kang Gu Hyun, Jang Yong Soo, Choi Hyun Young, Kim Jae Guk, Kim In Young, Kim Minji

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Republic of Korea Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Medicine, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(25):e10918. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010918.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000010918
PMID:29923977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6023685/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Leukosan SkinLink (LS), which combines non-woven textile strips and tissue adhesive, offers the advantage of atraumatic treatment while effectively shortening the procedure time. We hypothesized that wound closure would be faster with LS than with surgical suture (SS) and the wound infection and dehiscence would be similar.

METHODS

A prospective, open label, single-center, randomized controlled trial was performed. Between November 2014 and April 2016, 49 patients with traumatic lacerations who presented to the emergency department were eligible for study inclusion.

RESULTS

The mean wound closure time was significantly lower in the LS group than in the SS group (1.48 ± 0.2 seconds vs 8.8 ± 3.6 minutes, P < .001). After adjusting the wound closure time according to the lacerations length, the time remained significantly lower in the LS group than in the SS group (1.0 ± 0.8 seconds vs 5.03 ± 2.5minutes, P < .001). During follow-up for 14 days, no significant differences in dehiscence and wound infection were observed between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Wound closure was approximately 4minutes faster with LS and there were no differences in wound infection and dehiscence rates. Thus, the LS could be used as a timesaving suture technique for acute traumatic lacerations in emergency department (ED).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02333877.

摘要

背景

Leukosan SkinLink(LS)结合了无纺布条和组织粘合剂,具有无创治疗的优势,同时能有效缩短手术时间。我们假设,与手术缝线(SS)相比,使用LS闭合伤口的速度更快,且伤口感染和裂开情况相似。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性、开放标签、单中心、随机对照试验。在2014年11月至2016年4月期间,49例因创伤性撕裂伤就诊于急诊科的患者符合纳入研究的条件。

结果

LS组的平均伤口闭合时间显著低于SS组(1.48±0.2秒对8.8±3.6分钟,P<0.001)。根据撕裂伤长度调整伤口闭合时间后,LS组的时间仍显著低于SS组(1.0±0.8秒对5.03±2.5分钟,P<0.001)。在14天的随访期间,两组在裂开和伤口感染方面未观察到显著差异。

结论

使用LS闭合伤口的速度快约4分钟,且伤口感染率和裂开率无差异。因此,LS可作为急诊科急性创伤性撕裂伤的一种节省时间的缝合技术。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02333877。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf30/6023685/49f23ae55741/medi-97-e10918-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf30/6023685/a86f4210545d/medi-97-e10918-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf30/6023685/49f23ae55741/medi-97-e10918-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf30/6023685/a86f4210545d/medi-97-e10918-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf30/6023685/49f23ae55741/medi-97-e10918-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Leukosan SkinLink with surgical suture for traumatic laceration repair: A randomized controlled trial.Leukosan SkinLink与手术缝线用于外伤性撕裂伤修复的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(25):e10918. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010918.
2
Tissue adhesives for simple traumatic lacerations.用于简单外伤性撕裂伤的组织粘合剂。
J Athl Train. 2008 Apr-Jun;43(2):222-4. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-43.2.222.
3
A randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain gut versus nonabsorbable nylon sutures.一项随机对照试验,比较用可吸收的普通肠线与不可吸收的尼龙缝线修复小儿外伤性撕裂伤的长期美容效果。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jul;11(7):730-5. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.029.
4
Deep and Superficial Closure.深层和浅层闭合。
Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Mar 14;39(Suppl_2):S85-S93. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjy208.
5
Tissue adhesives for traumatic lacerations in children and adults.用于儿童和成人创伤性撕裂伤的组织粘合剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;2002(3):CD003326. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003326.
6
Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of tissue adhesive (2-octylcyanoacrylate) vs standard wound closure techniques for laceration repair. Stony Brook Octylcyanoacrylate Study Group.组织粘合剂(2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯)与标准伤口闭合技术用于撕裂伤修复的前瞻性、随机、对照试验。石溪氰基丙烯酸辛酯研究组。
Acad Emerg Med. 1998 Feb;5(2):94-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.1998.tb02590.x.
7
The Usefulness of Leukosan SkinLink for Simple Facial Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department.Leukosan SkinLink在急诊科用于单纯性面部裂伤修复的效用
Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Jul;42(4):431-7. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.4.431. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
8
Laceration repair using a tissue adhesive in a children's emergency department.在儿童急诊科使用组织粘合剂进行裂伤修复。
Pediatrics. 1996 Oct;98(4 Pt 1):673-5.
9
Cost-consequence analysis comparing 2-octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and suture for closure of simple lacerations: a randomized controlled trial.比较2-氰基丙烯酸辛酯组织粘合剂与缝线用于单纯性撕裂伤缝合的成本-后果分析:一项随机对照试验
Ann Emerg Med. 2009 Feb;53(2):189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Apr 28.
10
Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions.用于手术切口闭合的组织粘合剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12(5):CD004287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Suture Techniques for Traumatic Wound Closure in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review of Cosmetic, Functional, and Infection-Related Outcomes.急诊科创伤伤口缝合技术:美容、功能及感染相关结局的系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Jul 12;17(7):e87772. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87772. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing Steri-Strip and surgical staple wound closures after primary total knee arthroplasties.初次全膝关节置换术后Steri-Strip与外科吻合钉伤口闭合的比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Jan;27(1):113-118. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1848-x. Epub 2016 Sep 6.
2
The Usefulness of Leukosan SkinLink for Simple Facial Laceration Repair in the Emergency Department.Leukosan SkinLink在急诊科用于单纯性面部裂伤修复的效用
Arch Plast Surg. 2015 Jul;42(4):431-7. doi: 10.5999/aps.2015.42.4.431. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
3
Time is money: a faster way of Steri-Strip application (the 3-finger technique).
时间就是金钱:一种更快的应用皮肤缝合胶带的方法(三指技术)。
Aesthet Surg J. 2013 Aug 1;33(6):924-5. doi: 10.1177/1090820X13494756.
4
A randomized, controlled study comparing the cosmetic outcome of a new wound closure device with Prolene suture closing caesarean wounds.一项比较新型伤口闭合装置与 Prolene 缝线闭合剖宫产伤口美容效果的随机对照研究。
Int Wound J. 2011 Aug;8(4):329-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2011.00789.x. Epub 2011 May 26.
5
Is the use of Steri-StripTM S for wound closure after coronary artery bypass grafting better than intracuticular suture?冠状动脉搭桥术后使用皮肤缝合法(Steri-StripTM S)闭合伤口是否优于皮内缝合?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010 Apr;10(4):561-4. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2009.222190. Epub 2010 Jan 5.
6
Evaluation of a new wound closure device for linear surgical incisions: 3M Steri-Strip S Surgical Skin Closure versus subcuticular closure.评价一种用于线性手术切口的新型伤口闭合装置:3M Steri-Strip S 外科皮肤缝合与皮内缝合的比较。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Jan;125(1):186-194. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c2a492.
7
Revolutionary advances in the management of traumatic wounds in the emergency department during the last 40 years: part I.过去40年急诊科创伤伤口处理的革命性进展:第一部分
J Emerg Med. 2010 Jan;38(1):40-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.09.029. Epub 2009 Mar 5.
8
The cyanoacrylate topical skin adhesives.氰基丙烯酸酯局部皮肤粘合剂。
Am J Emerg Med. 2008 May;26(4):490-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.05.015.
9
Randomized controlled comparison of cosmetic outcomes of simple facial lacerations closed with Steri Strip Skin Closures or Dermabond tissue adhesive.使用皮肤免缝胶带或皮肤黏合剂闭合单纯面部裂伤的美容效果随机对照比较
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Aug;20(8):519-24. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000136068.45198.ae.
10
Tissue adhesives for closure of surgical incisions.用于外科手术切口闭合的组织粘合剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD004287. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004287.pub2.