Yang Weixing, Li Tingting, Wen Bo, Miao Zhixuan
POWERCHINA Northwest Engineering Corporation Limited, Xi'an, 710100, China.
Experimental Research Department, Technical Centre, Northwest Survey and Design Research Institute of China Electric Construction Group Co, Xi'an, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 13;15(1):29620. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15094-6.
Dam failures pose catastrophic risks to human life and property, necessitating robust safety monitoring systems for risk mitigation. However, the specific contributions of distinct monitoring modalities to dam safety remain inadequately characterized, particularly regarding their differential impacts on structural integrity assessment. This study investigates the correlation between diverse monitoring modalities and dam structural safety through a comprehensive analysis of the Silin Hydropower Station dam. We analyzed 324 datasets collected from nine types of monitoring sensors installed across 36 dam cross-sections. Statistical analyses including one-way ANOVA, cluster analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA) were employed to quantify the influence patterns of monitoring parameters. The safety impact levels of all 36 cross-sections were systematically ranked, establishing a prioritized reference framework to inform decision-making in dam safety management. Unlike conventional dam safety assessments that predominantly rely on subjective empirical judgments, this study introduces an objective methodology integrating principal component analysis (PCA) of heterogeneous monitoring data across multiple dam cross-sections. The analytical outcomes were systematically quantified, hierarchically ranked, and visualized through multidimensional mapping techniques. The results demonstrated that variations in fissure (X2), horizontal displacement (X3), tilt (X4), stress (X6), soil-displacement (X8), and denotes water-level (X9) exerted highly significant effects on dam safety (p < 0.001). The first two principal components cumulatively accounted for 74.1876% of the total variance, with eigenvalues reaching 6.6769. In the comprehensive evaluation, cross-section T4 (T4) obtained the maximum score (0.8500), while cross-section T35 (T35) showed the minimum score (0.0175). In conclusion, the analysis revealed that X9, X8, X2, X3, and X4 exerted significant impacts on dam safety, while cross-section T4 achieved the highest comprehensive evaluation score. This approach employs Principal Component Analysis (PCA) with integrated scoring to reduce multivariate dimensionality, enabling rapid identification of key monitoring sections critical to dam safety, and demonstrates broad applicability for dam safety monitoring.
大坝溃坝对人类生命和财产构成灾难性风险,因此需要强大的安全监测系统来降低风险。然而,不同监测方式对大坝安全的具体贡献仍未得到充分描述,尤其是它们对结构完整性评估的不同影响。本研究通过对西津水电站大坝的综合分析,探讨了多种监测方式与大坝结构安全之间的相关性。我们分析了从36个大坝横截面安装的九种监测传感器收集的324个数据集。采用包括单因素方差分析、聚类分析和主成分分析(PCA)在内的统计分析方法来量化监测参数的影响模式。对所有36个横截面的安全影响水平进行了系统排名,建立了一个优先参考框架,为大坝安全管理决策提供依据。与主要依赖主观经验判断的传统大坝安全评估不同,本研究引入了一种客观方法,将多个大坝横截面的异构监测数据进行主成分分析(PCA)。通过多维映射技术对分析结果进行了系统量化、分层排序和可视化。结果表明,裂缝(X2)、水平位移(X3)、倾斜(X4)、应力(X6)、土体位移(X8)和水位(X9)的变化对大坝安全产生了极显著影响(p < 0.001)。前两个主成分累计占总方差的74.1876%,特征值达到6.6769。在综合评价中,横截面T4获得最高分(0.8500),而横截面T35得分最低(0.0175)。总之,分析表明X9、X8、X2、X3和X4对大坝安全有显著影响,而横截面T4的综合评价得分最高。该方法采用主成分分析(PCA)和综合评分来降低多变量维度,能够快速识别对大坝安全至关重要的关键监测断面,并证明了其在大坝安全监测中的广泛适用性。