• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Investigating the level of nurses' participation in physicians' clinical decisions and the factors affecting it: evidence from a cross-sectional study from nurses' perspectives.调查护士参与医生临床决策的程度及其影响因素:基于护士视角的横断面研究证据
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 12;25(1):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13242-2.
2
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
5
Assessing employee silence about patient safety and its association with environmental factors among nurses in Ardabil: a cross-sectional study.评估阿尔达比勒护士对患者安全问题保持沉默的情况及其与环境因素的关联:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):274. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12426-0.
6
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
7
Effectiveness of culturally focused interventions in increasing the satisfaction of hospitalized Asian patients: a systematic review.以文化为重点的干预措施对提高住院亚洲患者满意度的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Aug;14(8):219-56. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003048.
8
An analysis of the mediating effect of presenteeism between job crafting and organizational silencing in junior nurses: a cross sectional study.初级护士中出勤主义在工作重塑与组织沉默之间的中介作用分析:一项横断面研究
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 15;16:1611392. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1611392. eCollection 2025.
9
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
10
Current Status and Influencing Factors of Chinese Nurses' Compassion Competence: A Cross-Sectional Study.中国护士共情能力的现状及影响因素:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2025 Jun;31(3):e70031. doi: 10.1111/ijn.70031.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between the Quantity of Nurse-Doctor Interprofessional Collaboration and in-Patient Mortality: A Systematic Review.护士 - 医生跨专业协作数量与住院患者死亡率之间的关联:一项系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Apr 17;21(4):494. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21040494.
2
Roles and competencies of nurses and physicians in shared decision-making in cardiac surgery: A scoping review.护士和医生在心脏手术共同决策中的角色与能力:一项范围综述
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jan;80(1):60-72. doi: 10.1111/jan.15811. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
3
How physicians see nurses' role in decision-making about life-prolonging treatments in patients with a short life expectancy: An interview study.医生如何看待护士在预期寿命较短的患者中决定延长生命的治疗方法中的角色:一项访谈研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Sep;114:107863. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107863. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
4
Physicians and nurses view on their roles in communication and collaboration with families: A qualitative study.医生和护士对其在与家庭沟通和协作中的角色的看法:一项定性研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2023 Dec;37(4):1109-1122. doi: 10.1111/scs.13185. Epub 2023 May 29.
5
Interprofessional Collaboration Between Nurses and Physicians in the Perioperative Period.围手术期护士与医生的跨专业协作
J Perianesth Nurs. 2023 Oct;38(5):724-731. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2022.12.002. Epub 2023 May 20.
6
Inter-professional collaboration and associated factors among nurses and physicians in specialized public hospitals, the northwest, Ethiopia: mixed method multi-centered cross-sectional study.多中心混合方法横断面研究:埃塞俄比亚西北部专科公立医院护士和医生之间的跨专业合作及其影响因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 27;23(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09200-5.
7
A systematic review of respect between acute care nurses and physicians.急性护理护士与医师之间尊重的系统评价
Health Care Manage Rev. 2023;48(3):237-248. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000370. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
8
Patients' perceptions of the quality of nursing services.患者对护理服务质量的看法。
BMC Nurs. 2022 May 27;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00906-1.
9
Nurses' perspective on their involvement in decision-making about life-prolonging treatments: A quantitative survey study.护士对参与延长生命治疗决策的看法:一项定量调查研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2022 Sep;78(9):2884-2893. doi: 10.1111/jan.15223. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
10
A qualitative exploration of nurse-physician collaboration in intensive care units.重症监护病房护士-医师合作的定性研究。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2022 Jun;70:103218. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2022.103218. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

调查护士参与医生临床决策的程度及其影响因素:基于护士视角的横断面研究证据

Investigating the level of nurses' participation in physicians' clinical decisions and the factors affecting it: evidence from a cross-sectional study from nurses' perspectives.

作者信息

Bordbar Shima, Radinmanesh Maryam, Bahmaei Jamshid, Rad Hamidreza Farhadi, Yusefi Ali Reza

机构信息

Health Human Resources Research Center, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Health Promotion Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 12;25(1):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13242-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-025-13242-2
PMID:40797220
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12341254/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interprofessional collaboration and participation of physicians and nurses in clinical decisions can be an important indicator in increasing the quality of safe care in hospitals. This study was conducted to investigate the level of nurses' participation in physicians' clinical decisions and the factors affecting it from the perspectives of nurses working in teaching hospitals affiliated with Shiraz University of Medical Sciences in southern Iran.

METHODS

This descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on 385 nurses from January to April 2024. The data collection tool was standard questionnaires. Data were analyzed using t-test, ANOVA, Pearson's correlation coefficient, and multiple linear regression using SPSS23 software at a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean scores of nurses' participation in physicians' clinical decisions and the factors affecting this participation were 41.12 ± 6.57 out of 75 and 84.32 ± 8.16 out of 150, respectively, which indicated the moderate status of these two. Between the amount of nurses' participation in physicians' clinical decisions and factors affecting this participation, including individual factors (P < 0.001, r = 0.825), social factors (P < 0.001, r = 0.784), organizational factors (P < 0.001, r = 0.766), and clinical factors (P < 0.001, r = 0.759), a statistically significant correlation was observed. Furthermore, individual (β = 0.721; CI = 0.400-1.042), social (β = 0.691; CI = 0.395-0.987), organizational (β = 0.664; CI = 0.374-0.954), and clinical (β = 0.639; CI = 0.381-0.897) factors were found to be significantly associated with nurses' participation in doctors' clinical decisions (P < 0.001). In addition, age (β = 0.213; CI = 0.025-0.401) and work experience (β = 0.194; CI = 0.047-0.341) also showed significant associations with the outcome (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results, the improvement of individual, social, organizational, and clinical factors may be associated with increasing nurses' participation in physicians' clinical decisions. It is recommended that nurses' participation in clinical decisions be emphasized by holding ongoing training courses such as collaborative management, conflict management, and evidence-based decision-making for physicians. Hospital managers should also train and improve communication skills between physicians and nurses by holding periodic courses and seminars in hospitals. The findings of this study can be a basis for planning to improve the status of nurses' participation in physicians' clinical decisions in hospitals.

摘要

背景

跨专业协作以及医生和护士参与临床决策可能是提高医院安全护理质量的一项重要指标。本研究旨在从伊朗南部设拉子医科大学附属教学医院护士的角度,调查护士参与医生临床决策的程度及其影响因素。

方法

本描述性分析横断面研究于2024年1月至4月对385名护士进行。数据收集工具为标准问卷。使用SPSS23软件进行t检验、方差分析、Pearson相关系数分析和多元线性回归分析,显著性水平为0.05。

结果

护士参与医生临床决策的平均得分及影响该参与度的因素得分分别为75分制中的41.12±6.57分和150分制中的84.32±8.16分,这表明两者均处于中等水平。在护士参与医生临床决策的程度与影响该参与度的因素之间,包括个人因素(P<0.001,r=0.825)、社会因素(P<0.001,r=0.784)、组织因素(P<0.001,r=0.766)和临床因素(P<0.001,r=0.759),观察到具有统计学意义的相关性。此外,发现个人(β=0.721;CI=0.400-1.042)、社会(β=0.691;CI=0.395-0.987)、组织(β=0.664;CI=0.374-0.954)和临床(β=0.639;CI=0.381-0.897)因素与护士参与医生临床决策显著相关(P<0.001)。此外,年龄(β=0.213;CI=0.025-0.401)和工作经验(β=0.194;CI=0.047-0.341)也与结果显示出显著关联(P<0.05)。

结论

基于研究结果,个人、社会、组织和临床因素的改善可能与提高护士参与医生临床决策的程度相关。建议通过为医生举办协作管理、冲突管理和循证决策等持续培训课程,强调护士参与临床决策。医院管理者还应通过在医院定期举办课程和研讨会来培训和提高医生与护士之间的沟通技巧。本研究结果可为规划改善医院护士参与医生临床决策的状况提供依据。