Porat-Dahlerbruch Joshua, Miller Tatyana, Boyd Jocelyn, Ellen Moriah E, Clark Rebecca R S
Department of Acute and Tertiary Care, School of Nursing, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Israel Implementation Science and Policy Engagement Centre, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Sep;72(3):e70096. doi: 10.1111/inr.70096.
To develop an international taxonomy of policy interventions for integrating advanced practice nurses into health systems.
Advanced practice nurse integration is the extent to which advanced practice nurses can function to the full extent of their education and scope of practice and contribute to better outcomes. Several barriers to integration are common across countries, such as an ill-defined scope of practice, lacking leadership engagement, and insufficient knowledge of the role. Barriers are attributed to a dearth of knowledge on evidence-based policy interventions guiding integration.
This was a nominal group expert consensus study with participants from multiple countries. Participants were divided into three meetings consisting of silent review of a preliminary taxonomy developed from a literature review and single-country testing, round-robin feedback, live revisions, and consensus voting. Each meeting resulted in a unique taxonomy, which researchers synthesized into one version. The synthesized taxonomy was sent for member checking and final consensus voting. The Accurate Consensus Reporting Document was used.
There were 12 experts representing 10 countries. Fifty-nine policy interventions were mapped to 14 categories. National-level categories included regulation, economic incentives, stakeholder cooperation, education and workforce development, marketing, and research. Organizational interventions included organizational guidelines, infrastructure development and resource allocation, interprofessional leadership engagement, and organizational messaging. Care team-level interventions included interprofessional experience/exposure, team communication, work environment, and research opportunities.
This taxonomy builds on prior research by including participants across countries with varying health system governance, wealth, and advanced practice development.
Applying this taxonomy may contribute to more efficacious advanced practice nursing integration and potentially improve outcomes.
A guide for adapting interventions to a health system, organization, or care team is included.
制定一项将高级实践护士纳入卫生系统的政策干预国际分类法。
高级实践护士的整合程度是指高级实践护士能够在其教育程度和执业范围内充分发挥作用,并有助于取得更好的成果。各国存在一些常见的整合障碍,例如执业范围界定不明确、缺乏领导参与以及对该角色的了解不足。这些障碍归因于缺乏基于证据的指导整合的政策干预知识。
这是一项名义群体专家共识研究,参与者来自多个国家。参与者分为三次会议,包括对从文献综述和单国测试中得出的初步分类法进行静默审查、循环反馈、现场修订和共识投票。每次会议都产生了一个独特的分类法,研究人员将其综合为一个版本。综合后的分类法被送去进行成员核对和最终共识投票。使用了准确共识报告文件。
有12名代表10个国家的专家。59项政策干预措施被映射到14个类别。国家层面的类别包括监管、经济激励、利益相关者合作、教育和劳动力发展、营销以及研究。组织干预措施包括组织指南、基础设施发展和资源分配、跨专业领导参与以及组织信息传递。护理团队层面的干预措施包括跨专业经验/接触、团队沟通、工作环境以及研究机会。
该分类法在先前研究的基础上,纳入了来自不同卫生系统治理、财富水平和高级实践发展情况的国家的参与者。
应用此分类法可能有助于更有效地整合高级实践护理,并有可能改善结果。
其中包括一份针对卫生系统、组织或护理团队调整干预措施的指南。