Gerlis Charlotte, Berry Alice, Thomas Rachel, Pacey-Halls Serena, Loizou Michael, Swales Caroline, Cramp Fiona
University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
University of the West of England, Bristol, UK.
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e095798. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095798.
Digital health interventions (DHIs) are prevalent and have been shown to help some people with long-term conditions (LTCs) to manage their condition. There are myriad options for digital delivery yet limited understanding of what modes of delivery are acceptable to people with LTCs. It is important to understand the acceptability of delivery methods of DHIs to inform future DHI development and promote engagement. This scoping review aims to explore the acceptability of the delivery of DHIs for people with LTCs.
This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance for scoping reviews and will be reported in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping reviews extension checklist. Databases including MEDLINE, PubMed, CINAHL, AHMED and PsycINFO will be searched for primary studies that provide data on preferences for delivery methods of DHIs by people with LTCs. Narrative analysis is anticipated, and a summary of the findings will be presented in a tabulated format.
Ethical approval will not be required for this scoping review. The findings will be disseminated via appropriate peer-reviewed journals and conferences and PhD theses.
数字健康干预措施（DHIs）很普遍，并且已被证明有助于一些患有长期疾病（LTCs）的人管理其病情。数字交付有多种选择，但对于患有长期疾病的人来说，对哪些交付方式是可接受的了解有限。了解数字健康干预措施的交付方式的可接受性对于为未来数字健康干预措施的开发提供信息并促进参与度很重要。本范围综述旨在探讨数字健康干预措施对患有长期疾病的人的交付可接受性。
本综述将遵循乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围综述指南，并将按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目范围综述扩展清单进行报告。将检索包括MEDLINE、PubMed、CINAHL、AHMED和PsycINFO在内的数据库，以查找提供有关患有长期疾病的人对数字健康干预措施交付方式偏好数据的原始研究。预计将进行叙述性分析，并以表格形式呈现研究结果的总结。
本范围综述无需伦理批准。研究结果将通过适当的同行评审期刊、会议和博士论文进行传播。
