• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字健康与护理技术的英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)证据标准框架——开发并维护具有全球影响力的创新证据框架。

The NICE Evidence Standards Framework for digital health and care technologies - Developing and maintaining an innovative evidence framework with global impact.

作者信息

Unsworth Harriet, Dillon Bernice, Collinson Lucie, Powell Helen, Salmon Mark, Oladapo Tosin, Ayiku Lynda, Shield Gary, Holden Joanne, Patel Neelam, Campbell Mark, Greaves Felix, Joshi Indra, Powell John, Tonnel Alexia

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Liverpool, UK.

Centre for Health Technology Evaluation, NICE, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Digit Health. 2021 Jun 24;7:20552076211018617. doi: 10.1177/20552076211018617. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

DOI:10.1177/20552076211018617
PMID:34249371
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8236783/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In 2018, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), in partnership with Public Health England, NHS England, NHS Improvement and others, developed an evidence standards framework (ESF) for digital health and care technologies (DHTs). The ESF was designed to provide a standardised approach to guide developers and commissioners on the levels of evidence needed for the clinical and economic evaluation of DHTs by health and care systems.

METHODS

The framework was developed using an agile and iterative methodology that included a literature review of existing initiatives and comparison of these against the requirements set by NHS England; iterative consultation with stakeholders through an expert working group and workshops; and questionnaire-based stakeholder input on a publicly available draft document.

RESULTS

The evidence standards framework has been well-received and to date the ESF has been viewed online over 55,000 times and downloaded over 19,000 times.

CONCLUSIONS

In April 2021 we published an update to the ESF. Here, we summarise the process through which the ESF was developed, reflect on its global impact to date, and describe NICE's ongoing work to maintain and improve the framework in the context for a fast moving, innovative field.

摘要

目的

2018年,英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)与英国公共卫生署、英国国民保健服务体系(NHS)英格兰分部、NHS改进部门及其他机构合作,制定了数字健康与护理技术(DHT)的证据标准框架(ESF)。该框架旨在提供一种标准化方法,指导开发者和委托方了解健康与护理系统对DHT进行临床和经济评估所需的证据水平。

方法

该框架采用敏捷迭代方法制定,包括对现有举措进行文献综述,并将其与NHS英格兰分部设定的要求进行比较;通过专家工作组和研讨会与利益相关者进行迭代磋商;以及基于问卷收集利益相关者对一份公开草稿文件的意见。

结果

证据标准框架受到了广泛欢迎,截至目前,ESF的在线浏览量已超过55000次,下载量超过19000次。

结论

2021年4月,我们发布了ESF的更新版本。在此,我们总结了ESF的制定过程,反思了其迄今为止的全球影响,并描述了NICE在这个快速发展的创新领域中为维护和改进该框架而正在进行的工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07f1/8236783/ab98ebbc08fc/10.1177_20552076211018617-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07f1/8236783/ab98ebbc08fc/10.1177_20552076211018617-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/07f1/8236783/ab98ebbc08fc/10.1177_20552076211018617-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
The NICE Evidence Standards Framework for digital health and care technologies - Developing and maintaining an innovative evidence framework with global impact.数字健康与护理技术的英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)证据标准框架——开发并维护具有全球影响力的创新证据框架。
Digit Health. 2021 Jun 24;7:20552076211018617. doi: 10.1177/20552076211018617. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
Application of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence Standards Framework for Digital Health Technologies in Assessing Mobile-Delivered Technologies for the Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Scoping Review.应用英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所数字健康技术证据标准框架评估用于2型糖尿病自我管理的移动交付技术:范围审查
JMIR Diabetes. 2021 Feb 16;6(1):e23687. doi: 10.2196/23687.
3
Medical Mobile App Classification Using the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence Standards Framework for Digital Health Technologies: Interrater Reliability Study.使用英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所数字健康技术证据标准框架对医疗移动应用程序进行分类:评分者间信度研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 5;22(6):e17457. doi: 10.2196/17457.
4
Mobile Safety Alarms Based on GPS Technology in the Care of Older Adults: Systematic Review of Evidence Based on a General Evidence Framework for Digital Health Technologies.基于 GPS 技术的老年人移动安全警报:基于数字健康技术通用证据框架的证据的系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 11;23(10):e27267. doi: 10.2196/27267.
5
Informing a decision framework for when NICE should recommend the use of health technologies only in the context of an appropriately designed programme of evidence development.为 NICE 何时应仅在适当设计的证据开发计划背景下推荐使用卫生技术制定决策框架提供信息。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(46):1-323. doi: 10.3310/hta16460.
6
Institute for Clinical and Economic Review - Peterson Health Technology Institute value assessment framework for digital health technologies.临床与经济评论研究所-彼得森医疗技术研究所数字健康技术价值评估框架。
J Comp Eff Res. 2023 Dec;12(12):e230154. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0154. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
7
Assessing the Value of Provider-Facing Digital Health Technologies Used in Chronic Disease Management: Toward a Value Framework Based on Multistakeholder Perceptions.评估用于慢性病管理的面向提供者的数字健康技术的价值:基于多利益相关者感知的价值框架。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Jan;44(1):28-41. doi: 10.1177/0272989X231206803. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
8
9
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
10
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving Digital Health Technologies: Aligning With and Enhancing the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Evidence Standards Framework.不断发展的数字健康技术:与英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所证据标准框架保持一致并加以完善
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 Aug 22;13:e67435. doi: 10.2196/67435.
2
A scoping review of frameworks evaluating digital health applications.一项关于评估数字健康应用程序的框架的范围综述。
Digit Health. 2025 Aug 18;11:20552076251315297. doi: 10.1177/20552076251315297. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Acceptability and preferences of people with long-term conditions for delivery of digital healthcare interventions: scoping review protocol.

本文引用的文献

1
From principles to practice: benchmarking government guidance on health apps.从原则到实践:政府健康应用指南的基准评估
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jun;1(2):e55-e57. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30027-5. Epub 2019 May 23.
2
Deriving a practical framework for the evaluation of health apps.推导一个用于评估健康应用程序的实用框架。
Lancet Digit Health. 2019 Jun;1(2):e52-e54. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30013-5. Epub 2019 May 23.
3
What is an appropriate level of evidence for a digital health intervention?数字健康干预的适当证据水平是什么?
患有长期疾病的人群对数字医疗干预措施的可接受性和偏好:范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e095798. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095798.
4
DigiBete, a Novel Chatbot to Support Transition to Adult Care of Young People/Young Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Outcomes From a Prospective, Multimethod, Nonrandomized Feasibility and Acceptability Study.DigiBete,一种支持1型糖尿病青少年/青年向成人护理过渡的新型聊天机器人:一项前瞻性、多方法、非随机可行性和可接受性研究的结果
JMIR Diabetes. 2025 Jul 23;10:e74032. doi: 10.2196/74032.
5
Addressing the Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues of Healthtech in Education: Insights From Japan.探讨健康科技在教育领域的伦理、法律和社会问题:来自日本的见解。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 18;9:e72781. doi: 10.2196/72781.
6
Technology adoption in healthcare: Delphi consensus for the early exploration and agile adoption of emerging healthcare technology conceptual framework.医疗保健领域的技术采用:新兴医疗技术概念框架早期探索与灵活采用的德尔菲共识
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2025 Jul 11;32(1):e101349. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101349.
7
Empowering Capabilities of People With Chronic Conditions Supported by Digital Health Technologies: Scoping Review.数字健康技术支持下慢性病患者的能力赋能:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 27;27:e68458. doi: 10.2196/68458.
8
Digital Health Interventions Targeting Psychological Health in Parents of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Protocol for a Scoping Review.针对自闭症谱系障碍儿童家长心理健康的数字健康干预措施:一项范围综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 4;14:e68677. doi: 10.2196/68677.
9
Triple cardiovascular disease detection with an artificial intelligence-enabled stethoscope (TRICORDER): design and rationale for a decentralised, real-world cluster-randomised controlled trial and implementation study.使用人工智能听诊器进行心血管疾病三联检测(TRICORDER):一项去中心化、真实世界整群随机对照试验及实施研究的设计与原理
BMJ Open. 2025 May 21;15(5):e098030. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098030.
10
A choice based conjoint analysis of mobile healthcare application preferences among physicians, patients, and individuals.医生、患者和个人对移动医疗应用偏好的基于选择的联合分析。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 3;8(1):244. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01610-5.
Lancet. 2019 Dec 22;392(10165):2665-2667. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)33129-5. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
4
How can clinicians, specialty societies and others evaluate and improve the quality of apps for patient use?临床医生、专业学会和其他人员如何评估和改进患者使用的应用程序的质量?
BMC Med. 2018 Dec 3;16(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1211-7.
5
Health Apps and Health Policy: What Is Needed?健康应用程序与健康政策:需要什么?
JAMA. 2018 Nov 20;320(19):1975-1976. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.14378.
6
SUITABILITY OF CURRENT EVALUATION FRAMEWORKS FOR USE IN THE HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OF MOBILE MEDICAL APPLICATIONS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW.现行评估框架在移动医疗应用的卫生技术评估中的适用性:系统评价。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(5):464-475. doi: 10.1017/S026646231800051X. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
7
The Emerging Imperative for a Consensus Approach Toward the Rating and Clinical Recommendation of Mental Health Apps.对心理健康应用程序进行评级和临床推荐的共识方法的迫切需求日益凸显。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2018 Aug;206(8):662-666. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000864.
8
Is digital medicine different?数字医学有何不同?
Lancet. 2018 Jul 14;392(10142):95. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31562-9.
9
Do health apps need endorsement? Challenges for giving advice about which health apps are safe and effective to use.健康应用程序需要认证吗?为推荐安全有效的健康应用程序提供建议面临的挑战。
Digit Health. 2017 Apr 10;3:2055207617701342. doi: 10.1177/2055207617701342. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
10
A framework for m-health service development and success evaluation.移动医疗服务的开发和成功评估框架。
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Apr;112:123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.003.