• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索护理学/助产学理学学士学位的可用入学标准:一项范围综述

Exploring available admission criteria for a bachelor of science in nursing/midwifery: a scoping review.

作者信息

Kiwelu Jackline Estomihi, Usiri Aminieli Itaeli, Keto Gadiel, Mwansisya Tumbwene, Pallangyo Eunice S

机构信息

Library Department, Aga Khan University Dar Es Salaam, Salama House, 344 Urambo St, P.O. Box 125, Dar Es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, Aga Khan University, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 13;24(1):1067. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03661-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-03661-1
PMID:40804375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12351881/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nursing and midwifery are crucial professions in healthcare systems, and the availability of well-trained professionals in these fields contributes to achieving global and national health goals. The process of equipping nurses and midwives with professional knowledge and skills starts with selecting candidates that are suitable for the profession, and able to complete nursing/midwifery education and become lifelong learners.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify and document currently available admission criteria for a Bachelor of Science (BSc) in Nursing/Midwifery.

METHODS

This scoping review used Arksey and O'Malley's five-stage framework to explore admission criteria for BSc in Nursing/Midwifery programs. The findings were reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist. The review period was January 2014 to May 2024.

RESULTS

We initially identified 551 studies from various databases. After a comprehensive screening process, 36 studies were eligible for this review; 33(91.7%) were from developed countries and three (8.3%) were from developing countries. The findings revealed several types of admission criteria that accommodated diversity and flexibility in procedures for selecting nursing/midwifery applicants. These criteria included the experience, attributes, and academic metrics model, holistic admission review, reasoning skills tests, value-based approaches, Multiple Mini Interviews, the Nursing Match instrument, validated thinking skills tests, psychological strength assessments, and a combination of cognitive and non-cognitive approaches.

CONCLUSION

Adopting admission criteria that are effective in selecting candidates who are well-suited for the nursing profession, reflect job market diversity, and are likely to excel in their academic pursuits is important, especially in Africa. Studies from developing countries encourage nursing schools to consider the diversity and flexibility of nursing/midwifery applicants. Developing frameworks or policies to accommodate diversity and flexibility will ensure proper implementation at the local level.

摘要

背景

护理和助产是医疗保健系统中的关键职业,这些领域训练有素的专业人员的可获得性有助于实现全球和国家卫生目标。为护士和助产士配备专业知识和技能的过程始于选拔适合该职业、能够完成护理/助产教育并成为终身学习者的候选人。

目的

本研究旨在识别并记录目前护理学/助产学理学学士的入学标准。

方法

本综述采用阿克西和奥马利的五阶段框架来探索护理学/助产学理学学士课程的入学标准。研究结果按照系统评价和Meta分析扩展版的范围综述清单的首选报告项目进行报告。综述时间段为2014年1月至2024年5月。

结果

我们最初从各种数据库中识别出551项研究。经过全面筛选过程,36项研究符合本综述的要求;33项(91.7%)来自发达国家,3项(8.3%)来自发展中国家。研究结果揭示了几种类型的入学标准,这些标准在选拔护理/助产申请者的程序中兼顾了多样性和灵活性。这些标准包括经验、特质和学术指标模型、整体入学审查、推理技能测试、基于价值观的方法、多次小型面试、护理匹配工具、经过验证的思维技能测试、心理优势评估以及认知和非认知方法的结合。

结论

采用有效的入学标准来选拔适合护理职业、反映就业市场多样性且可能在学业上表现出色的候选人非常重要,尤其是在非洲。来自发展中国家的研究鼓励护理学院考虑护理/助产申请者的多样性和灵活性。制定适应多样性和灵活性的框架或政策将确保在地方层面得到妥善实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8d/12351881/2f2035a251b7/12912_2025_3661_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8d/12351881/2f2035a251b7/12912_2025_3661_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e8d/12351881/2f2035a251b7/12912_2025_3661_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring available admission criteria for a bachelor of science in nursing/midwifery: a scoping review.探索护理学/助产学理学学士学位的可用入学标准:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 13;24(1):1067. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03661-1.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Factors that influence the provision of intrapartum and postnatal care by skilled birth attendants in low- and middle-income countries: a qualitative evidence synthesis.影响低收入和中等收入国家熟练助产士提供产时和产后护理的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 17;11(11):CD011558. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011558.pub2.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
The experiences of midwives and nurses collaborating to provide birthing care: a systematic review.助产士与护士合作提供分娩护理的经验:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):74-127. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2444.
7
Perceptions and experiences of the prevention, detection, and management of postpartum haemorrhage: a qualitative evidence synthesis.预防、检测和管理产后出血的认知和经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD013795. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013795.pub2.
8
The effectiveness of tools used to evaluate successful critical decision making skills for applicants to healthcare graduate educational programs: a systematic review.用于评估医疗保健研究生教育项目申请者成功关键决策技能的工具的有效性:一项系统综述。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 May 15;13(4):231-75. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2322.
9
Abortion learning mechanisms for nurses and midwives: a scoping review of evidence.护士和助产士的堕胎学习机制:证据的范围综述
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2025 Dec;33(1):2518672. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2025.2518672. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
10
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical values held by nursing students. Comparative study in two country.护理专业学生秉持的伦理价值观。两国比较研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Jul 30;23(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02198-z.
2
Nursing workforce competencies and job satisfaction: the role of technology integration, self-efficacy, social support, and prior experience.护理人员的能力与工作满意度:技术整合、自我效能感、社会支持及既往经验的作用
BMC Nurs. 2023 Sep 7;22(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01474-8.
3
A mixed methods evaluation of Multiple Mini Interviews for entry into the Bachelor of Midwifery.
对用于助产士学士学位入学的多迷你面试的混合方法评估。
Women Birth. 2023 Mar;36(2):193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.08.005. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
4
Holistic Admissions Review Integration in Nursing Programs.护理学专业课程的整体招生审核一体化
J Nurs Educ. 2022 Jul;61(7):361-366. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20220610-01. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
5
Selection process for admission to an academic nursing programme - A meta-synthesis.学术护理课程入学选拔过程——元综合分析。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Sep;116:105475. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105475. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
6
Personal statement versus psychological test as admission to the nursing degree: an evaluation.个人陈述与心理测试在护理学位入学中的比较:一项评估。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Jun 17;21(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-00919-w.
7
Admission to undergraduate nurse education programmes: Who should be selected?本科护理教育项目的招生:应该选拔谁?
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Feb;29(1):3-6. doi: 10.1177/09697330221081192.
8
Reliability and validity of new online selection tests for midwifery students.新的在线助产学生选拔测试的信度和效度。
Midwifery. 2022 Mar;106:103245. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103245. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
9
Multiple Mini Interviews as Part of Holistic Admissions Review for Nursing Schools.多站式面试作为护理学校整体招生评估的一部分。
J Prof Nurs. 2021 Nov-Dec;37(6):1086-1091. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.08.009. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
10
A literature review of emotional intelligence and nursing education.情绪智力与护理教育文献回顾。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Jul;54:103124. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103124. Epub 2021 Jun 21.