Al-Mhanna Sameer Badri, Poon Eric Tsz-Chun, Franklin Barry A, Tarnopolsky Mark A, Hawley John A, Jakicic John M, Stamatakis Emmanuel, Little Jonathan P, Pescatello Linda S, Riebe Deborah, Thompson Walter R, Skinner James S, Colberg Sheri R, Ehrman Jonathan K, Metsios George S, Douda Helen T, Omar Norsuhana, Alghannam Abdullah F, Batrakoulis Alexios
Center for Global Health Research, Saveetha Medical College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.
Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Aug 13;17(1):331. doi: 10.1186/s13098-025-01909-z.
To evaluate the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on cardiometabolic health-related outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and concurrent overweight/obesity (diabesity).
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched from inception up to January 31, 2025.
RCTs comparing HIIT alone ≥ 2 weeks in duration with moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT). Participants were adults with diabesity.
A total of 26 RCTs qualified, involving 790 patients (50/50 female/male ratio; age: 59.8 ± 12.9 years; body mass index: 28.9 ± 4.2 kg/m). HIIT revealed a significant reduction in fasting insulin [standardized mean differences (SMD) - 0.43, 95% CI - 0.82 to - 0.05] and homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR; SMD - 0.52, 95% CI - 0.97 to - 0.07) compared to MICT. Additionally, HIIT significantly increased cardiorespiratory fitness (VO₂max; SMD 0.53, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.91) compared to MICT. Other clinically relevant cardiometabolic outcomes, including body composition, lipid profile, fasting blood glucose, glycated hemoglobin, and blood pressure, showed comparable changes between HIIT and MICT. Subgroup analyses of studies reporting comorbidities indicated a significant increase in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (SMD 0.49, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.95) and a decrease in HOMA-IR (SMD - 0.83, 95% CI - 1.62 to - 0.04) for HIIT compared to MICT. However, these findings are limited by very low certainty evidence and non-robust sensitivity analyses.
The present findings suggest that HIIT may serve as an adjunctive non-pharmaceutical management solution for patients with diabesity. Open Science Framework registry: https://osf.io/9by24.
评估高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对2型糖尿病合并超重/肥胖(糖尿病肥胖症)患者心脏代谢健康相关结局的影响。
随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析。
检索了PubMed、科学网、Scopus、Science Direct、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术数据库,检索时间从建库至2025年1月31日。
将持续时间≥2周的单独HIIT与中等强度持续训练(MICT)进行比较的RCT。参与者为患有糖尿病肥胖症的成年人。
共有26项RCT符合条件,涉及790名患者(男女比例为50/50;年龄:59.8±12.9岁;体重指数:28.9±4.2kg/m)。与MICT相比,HIIT显示空腹胰岛素显著降低[标准化均数差(SMD)-0.43,95%置信区间-0.82至-0.05]以及胰岛素抵抗的稳态模型评估(HOMA-IR;SMD -0.52,95%置信区间-0.97至-0.07)。此外,与MICT相比,HIIT显著提高了心肺适能(最大摄氧量;SMD 0.53,95%置信区间0.14至0.91)。其他临床相关的心脏代谢结局,包括身体成分、血脂谱、空腹血糖、糖化血红蛋白和血压,在HIIT和MICT之间显示出相当的变化。报告合并症的研究的亚组分析表明,与MICT相比,HIIT使高密度脂蛋白胆固醇显著增加(SMD 0.49,95%置信区间0.04至0.95),HOMA-IR降低(SMD - 0.83,95%置信区间-1.62至-0.04)。然而,这些发现受到极低确定性证据和不稳健的敏感性分析的限制。
目前的研究结果表明,HIIT可能作为糖尿病肥胖症患者的辅助非药物管理解决方案。开放科学框架注册:https://osf.io/9by24。