Dobre-Baron Rareș, Savu-Jivanov Adrian, Ancuți Cosmin
Faculty of Electronics, Telecommunications and Information Technologies, Polytechnic University Timisoara, 300006 Timisoara, Romania.
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 1;25(15):4755. doi: 10.3390/s25154755.
The difficulty and manual nature of procuring human evaluators for ranking the quality of images affected by various types of degradations, and of those cleaned up by developed algorithms, has lead to the widespread adoption of automated metrics, like the Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and the Structural Similarity Index Metric (SSIM). However, disparities between rankings given by these metrics and those given by human evaluators have encouraged the development of improved image quality assessment (IQA) metrics that are a better fit for this purpose. These methods have been previously used solely for quality assessments and not as objectives in the training of neural networks for high-level vision tasks, despite the potential improvements that may come about by directly optimizing for desired metrics. This paper examines the adequacy of ten recent IQA metrics, compared with standard loss functions, within two trained dehazing neural networks, with observed broad improvement in their performance.
为受各种类型退化影响的图像以及经开发算法清理后的图像的质量进行排名时,获取人类评估者既困难又需人工操作,这导致了诸如峰值信噪比(PSNR)和结构相似性指数度量(SSIM)等自动化度量的广泛采用。然而,这些度量给出的排名与人类评估者给出的排名之间存在差异,这促使人们开发更适合此目的的改进型图像质量评估(IQA)度量。尽管直接针对所需度量进行优化可能会带来潜在改进,但这些方法以前仅用于质量评估,而未作为高级视觉任务的神经网络训练中的目标。本文在两个经过训练的去雾神经网络中,将十种最新的IQA度量与标准损失函数进行比较,考察了它们的适用性,观察到其性能有广泛的提升。