Fazel Anvari-Yazdi Abbas, MacPhee Daniel J, Badea Ildiko, Chen Xiongbiao
Division of Biomedical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 57 Campus Dr, Saskatoon SK S7K 5A9, Canada.
Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon SK S7N 5B4, Canada.
Biomater Biosyst. 2025 Aug 5;19:100115. doi: 10.1016/j.bbiosy.2025.100115. eCollection 2025 Sep.
Gynecologic postoperative adhesions (GPOA) remain an under-appreciated source of morbidity despite advances in minimally invasive surgery. Adhesions forming after myomectomy, extensive endometriosis excision, repeat caesarean section, or hysteroscopic adhesiolysis develop in 20 - 90 % of patients and account for up to 40 % of secondary infertility, chronic pelvic pain, bowel obstruction, and life-threatening obstetric complications such as placenta accreta spectrum. Because the uterus is hormonally responsive and destined for potential pregnancy, anti-adhesion barriers for gynecologic tissues must meet stricter criteria for biocompatibility, resorption timing, teratogenic safety, and reproductive regulatory classification than barriers designed for bowel or tendon repair. This review consolidates the rapidly expanding literature on biomaterial-based barriers specifically tailored for gynecologic applications. We first dissect the pathophysiology of uterine and adnexal adhesion formation-including mesothelial disruption, fibrin persistence, and estrogen-modulated wound remodeling-to highlight design targets unique to the female reproductive tract. Next, we critically appraise natural and synthetic polymers, discussing how formulation parameters govern in-vivo elimination or excretion routes and influence fertility outcomes. Cutting-edge fabrication strategies-such as electrospinning, 3D bioprinting, melt electrowriting, Janus hydrogels, and microneedle patches-are reviewed with an eye toward uterine conformity, minimally invasive deployability, and on-demand release of drugs or exosomes. We further map current FDA-cleared films (INTERCEED™, Seprafilm®, SurgiWrap®) against unmet gynecologic needs, delineate limitations, and identify opportunities for multifunctional, self-healing, image-visible, and patient-specific barrier platforms. By framing adhesion prevention through a gynecologic lens, this article provides clinicians, materials scientists, and device developers with a roadmap for translating next-generation barriers from bench to bedside, ultimately reducing infertility, surgical re-admission, and obstetric risk in women worldwide.
尽管微创手术取得了进展,但妇科术后粘连(GPOA)仍是一个未得到充分重视的发病原因。子宫肌瘤切除术、广泛的子宫内膜异位症切除术、剖宫产术或宫腔镜粘连松解术后形成粘连的患者比例为20%至90%,高达40%的继发性不孕、慢性盆腔疼痛、肠梗阻以及诸如胎盘植入谱系等危及生命的产科并发症都与之相关。由于子宫对激素有反应且有潜在妊娠的可能,用于妇科组织的抗粘连屏障必须满足比用于肠道或肌腱修复的屏障更严格的生物相容性、吸收时间、致畸安全性和生殖调节分类标准。本综述整合了迅速扩展的关于专门为妇科应用量身定制的基于生物材料的屏障的文献。我们首先剖析子宫和附件粘连形成的病理生理学,包括间皮破坏、纤维蛋白持续存在以及雌激素调节的伤口重塑,以突出女性生殖道特有的设计靶点。接下来,我们批判性地评估天然和合成聚合物,讨论配方参数如何控制体内消除或排泄途径并影响生育结果。对前沿制造策略,如静电纺丝、3D生物打印、熔体电写、Janus水凝胶和微针贴片进行了综述,着眼于子宫顺应性、微创可部署性以及药物或外泌体的按需释放。我们进一步将目前美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的薄膜(INTERCEED™、Seprafilm®、SurgiWrap®)与未满足的妇科需求进行比对,阐述其局限性,并确定多功能、自愈、图像可见和针对患者的屏障平台的机会。通过从妇科角度构建粘连预防,本文为临床医生、材料科学家和设备开发者提供了一条将下一代屏障从实验室转化到临床的路线图,最终降低全球女性的不孕率、手术再入院率和产科风险。