B H Shrikrishna, G Deepa
Otorhinolaryngology Head-Neck Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, IND.
Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 15;17(7):e87966. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87966. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, including machine learning (ML), deep learning, and large language models, are increasingly applied in medical diagnostics. In rhinology, these tools are being evaluated for tasks such as image interpretation, cytology classification, and clinical decision support. To systematically evaluate the application and diagnostic accuracy of AI technologies in rhinology, with a focus on clinical utility and implementation barriers. This review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Seventeen full-text studies were screened based on predefined eligibility criteria, focusing on AI applications with diagnostic metrics in rhinology. Data on AI type, diagnostic task, performance outcomes, and study quality were extracted and synthesized narratively. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Image-based diagnostic tools using convolutional neural networks demonstrated high accuracy (81%-99%) in nasal polyp detection, cytology classification, and computed tomography (CT) scan interpretation. ML models using patient-reported data achieved accuracies of 74.5%-85.5% for chronic rhinosinusitis prediction. Large language models like ChatGPT and Gemini were evaluated for clinical question answering, with performance exceeding 80% in some domains. Risk of bias was moderate in most primary studies, and none reported clinical integration beyond prototype stages. AI exhibits promising diagnostic accuracy across several applications in rhinology. However, significant challenges persist, including limited validation, methodological heterogeneity, and lack of clinical implementation. Future research should focus on prospective trials, explainability, and regulatory frameworks to ensure safe integration into clinical workflows.
包括机器学习(ML)、深度学习和大语言模型在内的人工智能(AI)技术正越来越多地应用于医学诊断。在鼻科学中,这些工具正在接受图像解读、细胞学分类和临床决策支持等任务的评估。为了系统评估AI技术在鼻科学中的应用和诊断准确性,重点关注临床实用性和实施障碍。本综述遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)2020指南。根据预先定义的纳入标准筛选了17项全文研究,重点关注鼻科学中具有诊断指标的AI应用。提取了关于AI类型、诊断任务、性能结果和研究质量的数据,并进行了叙述性综合。12项研究符合纳入标准。使用卷积神经网络的基于图像的诊断工具在鼻息肉检测、细胞学分类和计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描解读方面显示出较高的准确性(81%-99%)。使用患者报告数据的ML模型在慢性鼻-鼻窦炎预测方面的准确率达到74.5%-85.5%。对ChatGPT和Gemini等大语言模型进行了临床问题回答评估,在某些领域的性能超过了80%。大多数主要研究的偏倚风险为中等,且没有一项研究报告超越原型阶段的临床整合情况。AI在鼻科学的多个应用中显示出有前景的诊断准确性。然而,重大挑战仍然存在,包括验证有限、方法学异质性和缺乏临床实施。未来的研究应侧重于前瞻性试验、可解释性和监管框架,以确保安全整合到临床工作流程中。