Darbari Kaul Rhea, Sacks Peta-Lee, Thiel Cedric, Rimmer Janet, Kalish Larry, Campbell Raewyn Gay, Sacks Raymond, Di Ieva Antonio, Harvey Richard John
Rhinology and Skull Base Research Group, Applied Medical Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Computational NeuroSurgery (CNS) Lab, Macquarie Medical School, Faculty of Medicine, Human and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2025 Mar;39(2):147-158. doi: 10.1177/19458924241304082. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
Radiomics is a quantitative approach to medical imaging, aimed to extract features into large datasets. By using artificial intelligence (AI) methodologies, large radiomic data can be analysed and translated into meaningful clinical applications. In rhinology, there is heavy reliance on computed tomography (CT) imaging of the paranasal sinus for diagnostics and assessment of treatment outcomes. Currently, there is an emergence of literature detailing radiomics use in rhinology.
This systematic review aims to assess the current techniques used to analyze radiomic data from paranasal sinus CT imaging.
A systematic search was performed using Ovid MEDLINE and EMBASE databases from January 1, 2019 until March 16, 2024 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist and Cochrane Library Systematic Reviews for Diagnostic and Prognostic Studies. The QUADAS-2 and PROBAST tools were utilized to assess risk of bias.
Our search generated 1456 articles with 10 articles meeting eligibility criteria. Articles were divided into 2 categories, diagnostic (n = 7) and prognostic studies (n = 3). The number of radiomic features extracted ranged 4 to 1409, with analysis including non-AI-based statistical analyses (n = 3) or machine learning algorithms (n = 7). The diagnostic or prognostic utility of radiomics analyses were rated as excellent (n = 3), very good (n = 2), good (n = 2), or not reported (n = 3) based upon area under the curve receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) or accuracy. The average radiomics quality score was 36.95%.
Radiomics is an evolving field which can augment our understanding of rhinology diseases, however there are currently only minimal quality studies with limited clinical utility.
放射组学是一种医学成像的定量方法,旨在从大型数据集中提取特征。通过使用人工智能(AI)方法,可以分析大型放射组学数据并将其转化为有意义的临床应用。在鼻科学中,对鼻窦计算机断层扫描(CT)成像严重依赖于诊断和治疗结果的评估。目前,有大量文献详细介绍了放射组学在鼻科学中的应用。
本系统评价旨在评估目前用于分析鼻窦CT成像放射组学数据的技术。
使用Ovid MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库进行系统检索,检索时间为2019年1月1日至2024年3月16日,使用系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单以及Cochrane图书馆诊断和预后研究系统评价。使用QUADAS-2和PROBAST工具评估偏倚风险。
我们的检索共产生1456篇文章,其中10篇符合纳入标准。文章分为2类,诊断性研究(n = 7)和预后性研究(n = 3)。提取的放射组学特征数量在4到1409之间,分析包括基于非AI的统计分析(n = 3)或机器学习算法(n = 7)。根据曲线下面积接收器操作特征(AUC-ROC)或准确性,放射组学分析的诊断或预后效用被评为优秀(n = 3)、非常好(n = 2)、好(n = 2)或未报告(n = 3)。放射组学平均质量评分为36.95%。
放射组学是一个不断发展的领域,可以增强我们对鼻科疾病的理解,然而目前只有极少的高质量研究,临床效用有限。