Mathys Lindsay, Dewsnap Michael, Narwankar Medha
Department of Humanities in Medicine, Texas A&M University College of Medicine, Bryan, Texas, USA.
Tufts University School of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Graduate Medical Education, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2025 Jun 2;38(5):684-689. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2510044. eCollection 2025.
Female academic physician leaders (FAPLs) encounter challenges in their leadership roles, including gendered leadership expectations or fear of judgment, impacting their ability to express authenticity. This study examined FAPLs' perceptions of authentic leadership, factors shaping their leadership behaviors, and how authenticity influences their effectiveness as a leader.
Using a convergent mixed-methods design, 40 FAPLs at Texas A&M University College of Medicine were invited to participate. Nine completed the Authentic Leadership Questionnaire (ALQ), and 10 participated in semi-structured interviews.
Quantitative analysis revealed the strongest alignment with moral/ethical leadership dimensions, with a significant difference ( < 0.05) in decision-making based on core values. Qualitative thematic analysis emphasized authenticity's role in fostering trust, empowerment, and a positive workplace culture. However, participants reported suppressing authentic behaviors due to hierarchical constraints or fear of being perceived as weak. Authenticity was easier with career experience and mentorship from female leaders. While authenticity promoted collaboration and psychological safety, maintaining professional boundaries remained a challenge.
FAPLs value authenticity but face various barriers. Experience, mentorship, and institutional support are crucial in fostering environments where FAPLs can thrive. Future research could explore the impact of authentic leadership on workplace cultures within academic medicine.
女性学术医师领导者(FAPLs)在其领导角色中面临挑战,包括性别化的领导期望或对评判的恐惧,这影响了她们展现真实自我的能力。本研究考察了女性学术医师领导者对真实领导的认知、塑造其领导行为的因素,以及真实性如何影响她们作为领导者的有效性。
采用收敛性混合方法设计,邀请德克萨斯农工大学医学院的40名女性学术医师领导者参与。9人完成了真实领导问卷(ALQ),10人参与了半结构化访谈。
定量分析显示与道德/伦理领导维度的一致性最强,基于核心价值观的决策存在显著差异(<0.05)。定性主题分析强调了真实性在促进信任、赋权和积极的工作场所文化方面的作用。然而,参与者报告称,由于层级限制或担心被视为软弱,他们会抑制真实行为。随着职业经验的积累以及得到女性领导者的指导,展现真实性变得更容易。虽然真实性促进了合作和心理安全感,但保持职业界限仍然是一个挑战。
女性学术医师领导者重视真实性,但面临各种障碍。经验、指导和机构支持对于营造女性学术医师领导者能够蓬勃发展的环境至关重要。未来的研究可以探讨真实领导对学术医学工作场所文化的影响。