• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾移植术后切口疝的预测:伤口缝合技术及危险因素分析

Prediction of incisional hernia after kidney transplantation: analysis of wound closure technique and risk factors.

作者信息

Huitfeldt Sola Kristoffer, Brismar Torkel, Lorant Tomas, Fränneby Ulf, Larsson Oskar, Genberg Helena

机构信息

Division of Radiology, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Hernia. 2025 Aug 19;29(1):256. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03452-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-025-03452-2
PMID:40828207
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12364985/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Incisional hernia (IH) is a common complication after kidney transplantation, impacting morbidity and quality of life. This retrospective study aimed to identify IH risk factors and develop a predictive model.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 667 adult kidney transplant recipients (2010-2017) from two transplant centres. Medical records were screened for symptoms of abdominal wall impairment, postoperative CT scans assessed, and factors associated with IH analysed. Using the Penn Hernia Calculator, hernia probability was calculated. Adult kidney recipients transplanted 2018-2019 in Region Stockholm served as verification cohort. In a subgroup with preoperative CT scans after progression to stage 5 chronic kidney disease, muscle quality was assessed. A wound closure technique using self-locking knots, two-layer parietal running suture, and a suture-to-wound length ratio ≥ 4:1 was termed "modified Israelsson."

RESULTS

Logistic regression identified age, BMI, renal replacement therapy duration, and wound closure technique as independent IH risk factors (pseudo R² = 0.15). The "modified Israelsson method" reduced IH odds by 83% (OR = 0.17). Sarcopenia and myosteatosis were not significant predictors. In the verification cohort, the model had 76% sensitivity for high-risk patients (≥ 10% predicted IH risk), outperforming the Penn Hernia Calculator.

CONCLUSION

Wound closure technique is the strongest modifiable predictor of symptomatic IH identified in this cohort. The "modified Israelsson method" is a straightforward technique that shows strong promise for reducing incisional hernia (IH) rates and appears highly implementable. Our findings also underscore the value of developing specific predictive models for kidney transplant recipients, as generic tools may not capture crucial intraoperative factors.

摘要

目的

切口疝(IH)是肾移植术后常见的并发症,会影响发病率和生活质量。这项回顾性研究旨在确定IH的危险因素并建立预测模型。

方法

我们回顾性分析了来自两个移植中心的667例成年肾移植受者(2010 - 2017年)。筛查病历以寻找腹壁损伤症状,评估术后CT扫描结果,并分析与IH相关的因素。使用宾夕法尼亚疝计算器计算疝发生概率。2018 - 2019年在斯德哥尔摩地区接受移植的成年肾移植受者作为验证队列。在进展到5期慢性肾病后进行术前CT扫描的亚组中,评估肌肉质量。使用自锁结、两层腹膜连续缝合且缝合线与伤口长度比≥4:1的伤口闭合技术被称为“改良以色列松技术”。

结果

逻辑回归确定年龄、体重指数、肾脏替代治疗持续时间和伤口闭合技术为独立的IH危险因素(伪R² = 0.15)。“改良以色列松方法”使IH发生几率降低了83%(OR = 0.17)。肌肉减少症和肌脂肪变性不是显著的预测因素。在验证队列中,该模型对高危患者(预测IH风险≥10%)的敏感性为76%,优于宾夕法尼亚疝计算器。

结论

伤口闭合技术是该队列中确定的有症状IH的最强可改变预测因素。“改良以色列松方法”是一种简单的技术,在降低切口疝(IH)发生率方面显示出巨大潜力,且似乎易于实施。我们的研究结果还强调了为肾移植受者开发特定预测模型的价值,因为通用工具可能无法捕捉关键的术中因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b5/12364985/169865d1b3f7/10029_2025_3452_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b5/12364985/d5b318ff6669/10029_2025_3452_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b5/12364985/9c4230feb65f/10029_2025_3452_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b5/12364985/2d9ec386f03e/10029_2025_3452_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b5/12364985/169865d1b3f7/10029_2025_3452_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b5/12364985/d5b318ff6669/10029_2025_3452_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b5/12364985/9c4230feb65f/10029_2025_3452_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b5/12364985/2d9ec386f03e/10029_2025_3452_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a7b5/12364985/169865d1b3f7/10029_2025_3452_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of incisional hernia after kidney transplantation: analysis of wound closure technique and risk factors.肾移植术后切口疝的预测:伤口缝合技术及危险因素分析
Hernia. 2025 Aug 19;29(1):256. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03452-2.
2
Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.用于预防切口疝及其他伤口并发症的剖腹手术切口闭合方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2.
3
Abdominal wound dehiscence and incisional hernia prevention in midline laparotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.腹部切口裂开和切口疝预防的中线剖腹术:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jul 7;408(1):268. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02954-w.
4
Incidence and risk factors for recurrence of incisional hernia repair after liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.肝移植术后切口疝修补复发的发生率及危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究
Hernia. 2025 Jun 27;29(1):217. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03400-0.
5
The impact of comorbidities and surgical approach in incisional hernia development after minimally invasive cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of multivariate regression-adjusted studies.合并症及手术方式对微创胆囊切除术后切口疝发生的影响:多因素回归调整研究的系统评价与Meta分析
Hernia. 2025 Apr 23;29(1):148. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03340-9.
6
Prophylactic Mesh Reinforcement Versus Primary Suture for Abdominal Wall Closure after Elective Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair with Midline Laparotomy Incision: Updated Systematic Review Including Time-To-Event Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.预防性补片加固与直接缝合在经腹直肌切口行择期腹主动脉瘤修复术后腹壁关闭中的应用:包括时间事件荟萃分析和随机对照试验序贯分析的更新系统评价。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;109:149-161. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2024.06.026. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
7
Systematic Review and Meta-Regression of Factors Affecting Midline Incisional Hernia Rates: Analysis of 14,618 Patients.影响中线切口疝发生率因素的系统评价与Meta回归分析:对14618例患者的分析
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 21;10(9):e0138745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138745. eCollection 2015.
8
Recovery after abdominal wall reconstruction.腹壁重建后的恢复
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
9
Does prophylactic mesh placement in elective, midline laparotomy reduce the incidence of incisional hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis.在择期正中剖腹手术中预防性放置补片是否能降低切口疝的发生率?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surgery. 2017 Apr;161(4):1149-1163. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.036. Epub 2016 Dec 28.
10
Postoperative Incisional Complications in Gynaecologic Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery: Comparing Closure Techniques.妇科单孔腹腔镜手术术后切口并发症:比较缝合技术。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2024 Jun;46(6):102416. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2024.102416. Epub 2024 Feb 23.

本文引用的文献

1
International comparison and time trends of first kidney transplant recipient characteristics across Europe: an ERA Registry study.国际比较与欧洲各国首次肾移植受者特征的时间趋势:ERA 注册研究。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2024 Mar 27;39(4):648-658. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfad189.
2
Hughes abdominal closure versus standard mass closure to reduce incisional hernias following surgery for colorectal cancer: the HART RCT.Hughes 腹部关闭术与标准质量关闭术在减少结直肠癌手术后切口疝中的比较:HART RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Aug;26(34):1-100. doi: 10.3310/CMWC8368.
3
Effects of the short-stitch technique for midline abdominal closure: short-term results from the randomised-controlled ESTOIH trial.
短缝线技术在腹部正中切口关闭中的作用:来自随机对照 ESTOIH 试验的短期结果。
Hernia. 2022 Feb;26(1):87-95. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02410-y. Epub 2021 May 28.
4
Risk Factors and Optimal Methods for Incisional Hernias After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience From Asia.亚洲单中心经验:肾移植术后切口疝的危险因素和最佳治疗方法。
Transplant Proc. 2021 Apr;53(3):1048-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2021.02.012. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
5
Living versus deceased kidney transplantation: Comparison of complications.活体与尸体肾移植:并发症比较。
Urologia. 2021 Aug;88(3):185-189. doi: 10.1177/0391560321993540. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
6
The emerging role of sarcopenia as a prognostic indicator in patients undergoing abdominal wall hernia repairs: a systematic review of the literature.肌少症作为腹外疝修补术患者预后指标的新作用:文献系统评价。
Hernia. 2020 Dec;24(6):1361-1370. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02179-6. Epub 2020 Apr 16.
7
Can We Predict Incisional Hernia?: Development of a Surgery-specific Decision-Support Interface.能否预测切口疝?:开发一种针对手术的决策支持接口。
Ann Surg. 2019 Sep;270(3):544-553. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003472.
8
Sarcomania? The Inapplicability of Sarcopenia Measurement in Predicting Incisional Hernia Development.肌肉减少症?肌肉减少症测量在预测切口疝发生中的不适用性。
World J Surg. 2019 Mar;43(3):772-779. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4837-x.
9
Percentiles for skeletal muscle index, area and radiation attenuation based on computed tomography imaging in a healthy Caucasian population.基于 CT 成像的健康白种人群骨骼肌指数、面积和辐射衰减百分位数。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2018 Feb;72(2):288-296. doi: 10.1038/s41430-017-0034-5. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
10
Japan Society of Hepatology guidelines for sarcopenia in liver disease (1st edition): Recommendation from the working group for creation of sarcopenia assessment criteria.日本肝脏学会肝病相关肌少症指南(第 1 版):肌少症评估标准制定工作组的推荐意见。
Hepatol Res. 2016 Sep;46(10):951-63. doi: 10.1111/hepr.12774.