• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

疫苗接种态度检查(VAX)量表丹麦语翻译的验证

Validation of the Danish translation of the vaccination attitudes examination (VAX) scale.

作者信息

Buhl Caroline, Jacobsen Ramune, Traulsen Janine Marie, Andersen Armin, Almarsdóttir Anna Birna

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2025 Aug 30;62:127620. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127620. Epub 2025 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127620
PMID:40829384
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Short and valid instruments measuring vaccination attitudes across countries are limited. The recently developed 12-item Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) scale measures vaccination hesitancy and consists of four subscales: (1) mistrust of vaccine benefits, (2) worries over unforeseen future effects, (3) concerns about commercial profiteering, and (4) preference for natural immunity. The original English version has been translated and validated in different languages. This study aimed to validate the Danish translation of the VAX scale.

METHODS

The Danish translation of the VAX scale was distributed to Danish citizens using social media via the online survey system SurveyXact. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) examined the factor structure. Internal consistency reliability was evaluated for the entire scale and all subscales. Known group validity was tested using vaccination status. Criterion validity was assessed using the beliefs about medicines questionnaire (BMQ).

RESULTS

Analysis of responses from 194 participants revealed an adequate four-subscale construct (GFI = 0.939, AGFI = 0.901, NFI = 0.955, TLI = 0.976, CFI = 0.982, RMSEA = 0.056, SRMR = 0.037, p = 0.005) and a high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α 0.934 for the entire scale, 0.920, 0.824, 0.833, and 0.899 for the four subscales, respectively). COVID-19 vaccinated participants showed significantly lower VAX scale scores (Mean(SD) = 2.36(0.83)) compared to non-vaccinated (Mean(SD) = 4.88(0.93)). A significant correlation was found with BMQ-general (r = -0.716, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The Danish translation of the VAX scale demonstrated a well-defined four-factor structure with high internal consistency, known group validity, and criterion validity. It is a useful tool to measure vaccination hesitancy in Denmark.

摘要

背景与目的

用于衡量各国疫苗接种态度的简短且有效的工具有限。最近开发的12项疫苗接种态度调查问卷(VAX)量表用于测量疫苗犹豫程度,由四个子量表组成:(1)对疫苗益处的不信任;(2)对不可预见的未来影响的担忧;(3)对商业牟利的关注;(4)对自然免疫的偏好。原始英文版本已被翻译成不同语言并进行了验证。本研究旨在验证VAX量表的丹麦语翻译版本。

方法

通过在线调查系统SurveyXact,利用社交媒体将VAX量表的丹麦语翻译版本分发给丹麦公民。验证性因素分析(CFA)检验因素结构。对整个量表和所有子量表评估内部一致性信度。使用疫苗接种状况测试已知群体效度。使用药物信念问卷(BMQ)评估效标效度。

结果

对194名参与者的回答进行分析,结果显示有一个合适的四分量表结构(GFI = 0.939,AGFI = 0.901,NFI = 0.955,TLI = 0.976,CFI = 0.982,RMSEA = 0.056,SRMR = 0.如果您还有其他需求,请随时告诉我。037,p = 0.005)以及较高的内部一致性信度(整个量表的Cronbach's α为0.934,四个子量表的Cronbach's α分别为0.920、0.824、0.833和0.899)。与未接种新冠疫苗的参与者(均值(标准差)= 4.88(0.93))相比,接种新冠疫苗的参与者的VAX量表得分显著更低(均值(标准差)= 2.36(0.83))。与BMQ-一般量表发现显著相关性(r = -0.716,p < 0.01)。

结论

VAX量表的丹麦语翻译版本显示出明确的四因素结构,具有较高的内部一致性、已知群体效度和效标效度。它是丹麦测量疫苗犹豫程度的有用工具。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Danish translation of the vaccination attitudes examination (VAX) scale.疫苗接种态度检查(VAX)量表丹麦语翻译的验证
Vaccine. 2025 Aug 30;62:127620. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127620. Epub 2025 Aug 18.
2
Validation of the Arabic translation of the vaccination attitudes examination (VAX) scale.疫苗接种态度调查问卷(VAX)阿拉伯语翻译的验证
Vaccine. 2024 Dec 2;42(26):126411. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126411. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
3
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the autism spectrum knowledge scale.自闭症谱系知识量表土耳其语版本的效度和信度研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2025 Jun 25;258:105204. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105204.
4
Psychometric validation of the 5-item parent attitudes about childhood vaccines survey (PACV-5) in an Italian parental population.意大利父母群体中5项儿童疫苗家长态度调查问卷(PACV-5)的心理测量学验证
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jul 31;184(8):514. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06342-y.
5
Understanding social perceptions of epilepsy: The Japanese version of the attitudes and beliefs about living with epilepsy (ABLE) scale development and validation study.了解社会对癫痫的认知:癫痫患者生活态度与信念量表(ABLE)日语版的编制与验证研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2025 Oct;171:110605. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110605. Epub 2025 Jul 19.
6
Adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the digital addiction scale for children (DASC).儿童数字成瘾量表中文版(DASC)的改编与验证
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):2599. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23817-7.
7
Psychometric validation of the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy scale for primary and booster doses among university students: A cross-sectional study.大学生新冠疫苗基础免疫和加强免疫接种犹豫量表的心理测量学验证:一项横断面研究
Vaccine. 2025 Aug 13;61:127368. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127368. Epub 2025 Jun 7.
8
The attitude of the unvaccinated children's parents toward pediatric COVID-19 vaccination in Tabriz, Iran.伊朗大不里士未接种疫苗儿童的父母对儿童新冠疫苗接种的态度。
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):248. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05615-7.
9
Empowerment in primary care and psychiatric settings: a psychometric evaluation of the Swedish version of the empowerment scale.初级保健和精神科环境中的赋权:赋权量表瑞典语版本的心理测量评估
BMC Psychol. 2025 Aug 13;13(1):909. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03123-y.
10
A cross-sectional study of the predictors of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Pakistan.一项关于巴基斯坦新冠疫苗犹豫因素的横断面研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2549164. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2549164. Epub 2025 Aug 27.