Nutbeam Tim, Fenwick Rob, Marritt Ian, Lee Brian, Staveley-Wadham Luke, Lang Nigel, Johnson Louise, Mattock Nicolas, Ogilvie Jane, Foote Emily, Screech Francis, Lebeau-Humarau Lara, Leech Caroline
IMPACT; Centre for Post-Collision Research Innovation and Translation, Exeter, UK.
University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2025 Aug 19;33(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13049-025-01451-x.
Physically trapped patients following motor vehicle collisions are at high risk of time-critical injuries and poor outcomes. Despite this, there is limited consensus on which injuries should be prioritised and which early interventions are both necessary and feasible in the prehospital setting. This study aims to develop expert consensus on injury categorisation and the delivery of early care interventions to guide clinical and operational decision-making at the scene.
A modified Delphi method was used to gather consensus from a multidisciplinary panel of subject matter experts, including clinicians, paramedics, and members of fire and rescue services. In Round 1, participants contributed to the development of draft statements relating to injury time sensitivity, intervention prioritisation, and responder roles. In Rounds 2 and 3, participants rated their level of agreement with these refined statements. A final face-to-face consensus meeting was held to discuss statements that had not yet reached consensus, explore areas of disagreement, and conduct further voting where appropriate. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement.
Consensus was achieved on 45 statements across the domains of injury categorisation, time-critical interventions, and multi-agency responsibilities. Participants strongly endorsed the early delivery of analgesia, tranexamic acid, and protection from environmental stressors, regardless of provider background, provided that appropriate training and governance are in place. There was broad support for expanding the scope of practice of non-clinical responders to meet urgent patient needs.
This Delphi consensus provides a framework for prioritising early interventions in the care of trapped patients. It supports a patient-centred, capability-based approach to prehospital care, emphasising feasibility, urgency, and ethical responsibility. Findings should inform the development of standard operating procedures, triage tools, and training frameworks across emergency services, with further research needed to validate assessment heuristics and address barriers to implementation.
机动车碰撞事故中受困的患者面临时间紧迫性损伤和不良预后的高风险。尽管如此,对于在院前环境中应优先处理哪些损伤以及哪些早期干预措施既必要又可行,目前尚未达成广泛共识。本研究旨在就损伤分类和早期护理干预措施达成专家共识,以指导现场的临床和操作决策。
采用改良的德尔菲法,从包括临床医生、护理人员以及消防和救援服务人员在内的多学科主题专家小组中收集共识。在第一轮中,参与者为与损伤时间敏感性、干预优先级和响应者角色相关的声明草案的制定做出贡献。在第二轮和第三轮中,参与者对这些完善后的声明表示同意的程度进行评分。最后举行了一次面对面的共识会议,讨论尚未达成共识的声明,探讨分歧领域,并在适当情况下进行进一步投票。共识定义为≥70%的同意率。
在损伤分类、时间紧迫干预措施和多机构责任等领域的45项声明上达成了共识。参与者强烈支持尽早给予镇痛、氨甲环酸,并保护患者免受环境应激源的影响,前提是有适当的培训和管理措施,且无论提供者背景如何。广泛支持扩大非临床响应者的实践范围,以满足患者的紧急需求。
这一德尔菲共识为优先处理受困患者的早期干预措施提供了一个框架。它支持以患者为中心、基于能力的院前护理方法,强调可行性、紧迫性和道德责任。研究结果应为各应急服务部门制定标准操作程序、分诊工具和培训框架提供参考,还需要进一步研究来验证评估启发法并解决实施障碍。