Suppr超能文献

诵读困难者、正常读者和阅读能力迟缓者在依次注视数字时的眼动差异。

Eye movement differences between dyslexics, normal, and retarded readers while sequentially fixating digits.

作者信息

Pavlidis G T

出版信息

Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1985 Dec;62(12):820-32. doi: 10.1097/00006324-198512000-00003.

Abstract

The eye movements of 13 dyslexics, 10 normal, and 16 retarded readers were recorded while they sequentially fixated 7 equidistantly spaced digits from left to right (L----R) and right to left (R----L). This nonreading task simulated the sequential motor components of the reading process. Dyslexics and their controls were selected on the basis of comprehensive and quantifiable criteria. All three groups were of the same chronological age. The dyslexics and retarded readers had also the same reading difficulties, but the causes of their problems were different. Dyslexics made significantly more regressions than the normal or the retarded readers in both directions (L----R and R----L). These results were in line with the ones reported in similar studies and suggest that the dyslexics' erratic eye movements and their excessive number of regressions are present even in nonreading, nonverbal sequential tasks. It may, therefore, be possible to use the eye movement records from nonreading sequential tasks for the objective diagnosis of dyslexia. As such tasks do not depend on reading, they may even be used before reading age.

摘要

记录了13名诵读困难者、10名正常读者和16名阅读障碍读者的眼动情况,他们依次从左到右(L----R)和从右到左(R----L)注视7个等距排列的数字。这项非阅读任务模拟了阅读过程中的连续运动成分。诵读困难者及其对照组是根据全面且可量化的标准挑选出来的。所有三组人的实际年龄相同。诵读困难者和阅读障碍读者有相同的阅读困难,但他们问题的成因不同。在两个方向(L----R和R----L)上,诵读困难者的回视次数都显著多于正常读者或阅读障碍读者。这些结果与类似研究报告的结果一致,表明即使在非阅读、非语言的连续任务中,诵读困难者也存在不稳定的眼动和过多的回视。因此,有可能利用非阅读连续任务的眼动记录来客观诊断诵读困难。由于此类任务不依赖阅读,甚至可以在阅读年龄之前使用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验