Li Chia-Chun, Ou Ling-Chun, Chang Yin-Fan, Chang Chin-Sung, Sun Zih-Jie, Cheng Tien-Tsai, Kuo Li-Chieh, Wu Chih-Hsing
Institute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Osteoporos Int. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1007/s00198-025-07656-1.
UNLABELLED: Patients with lower bone mineral density (BMD) face an increased risk of fragile fractures and should be actively screened to mitigate this vulnerability. Given the limitations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), it is possible to identify high-risk osteoporosis groups through simple self-assessment tools for further BMD measurements. PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the sex- and age-specific sensitivity and specificity of these simple tools for predicting osteoporosis risk to enhance the overall management of osteoporosis risk in the community. METHODS: This study enrolled subjects surveyed from epidemiological cohorts in Taiwan. Osteoporosis risk was assessed via the OSTA (for Asian women), and the OSTAi and MOSTAi (for Taiwanese women and men). Osteoporosis was defined as the lowest T-score ≤ - 2.5 based on the BMD of the lumbar spine and hip, as measured via DXA. The OSTAi and MOSTAi algorithms were used to analyze the self-assessment performance via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) analyses. RESULTS: A total of 1976 participants were enrolled in the study; 52.8% were women, with a mean age of 65.4 years. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting osteoporosis were as follows: MOSTAi (sensitivity/specificity = 0.53/0.72), OSTA (0.71/0.77), and OSTAi (0.77/0.73). The eOSTAi demonstrated favorable sensitivity in women, with AUCs of 0.8200 for osteoporosis and 0.7643 for osteopenia. In men, eMOSTAi showed fair sensitivity (AUC = 0.6690 for osteoporosis and 0.5626 for osteopenia). The cutoffs of the eOSTAi and eMOSTAi for detecting osteoporosis decreased with age. CONCLUSION: The cutoff of OSTAi is suitable for self-assessment of osteoporosis in Taiwanese women. However, for men, the cutoff of MOSTAi may need to be adjusted. Considering the differences in the prevalence of osteoporosis in the community, it is recommended that the cutoff be set according to gender and age.
未标注:骨矿物质密度(BMD)较低的患者面临脆性骨折风险增加,应积极进行筛查以减轻这种易感性。鉴于双能X线吸收法(DXA)的局限性,可以通过简单的自我评估工具识别高危骨质疏松症群体,以便进一步测量骨密度。 目的:本研究旨在评估这些简单工具预测骨质疏松症风险的性别和年龄特异性敏感性和特异性,以加强社区骨质疏松症风险的整体管理。 方法:本研究纳入了台湾流行病学队列调查的受试者。通过OSTA(针对亚洲女性)、OSTAi和MOSTAi(针对台湾女性和男性)评估骨质疏松症风险。根据通过DXA测量的腰椎和髋部骨密度,将骨质疏松症定义为最低T值≤ -2.5。使用OSTAi和MOSTAi算法通过受试者工作特征(ROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)分析来分析自我评估性能。 结果:本研究共纳入1976名参与者;52.8%为女性,平均年龄65.4岁。检测骨质疏松症的敏感性和特异性如下:MOSTAi(敏感性/特异性 = 0.53/0.72)、OSTA(0.71/0.77)和OSTAi(0.77/0.73)。改良OSTAi在女性中显示出良好的敏感性,骨质疏松症的AUC为0.8200,骨量减少的AUC为0.7643。在男性中,改良MOSTAi显示出中等敏感性(骨质疏松症的AUC = 0.6690,骨量减少的AUC = 0.5626)。改良OSTAi和改良MOSTAi检测骨质疏松症的临界值随年龄降低。 结论:OSTAi的临界值适用于台湾女性骨质疏松症的自我评估。然而,对于男性,MOSTAi的临界值可能需要调整。考虑到社区中骨质疏松症患病率的差异,建议根据性别和年龄设定临界值。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024-9-1
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-1-27
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007-8
Health Technol Assess. 2007-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-7-2
J Assoc Physicians India. 2025-6
Arch Osteoporos. 2022-1-29
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021-11-16