• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持者与怀疑者:基于大语言模型对视频分享平台上心理健康(错误)信息内容的参与度分析

Supporters and Skeptics: LLM-based Analysis of Engagement with Mental Health (Mis)Information Content on Video-sharing Platforms.

作者信息

Nguyen Viet Cuong, Jain Mini, Chauhan Abhijat, Soled Heather Jaime, Lesmes Santiago Alvarez, Li Zihang, Birnbaum Michael L, Tang Sunny X, Kumar Srijan, De Choudhury Munmun

机构信息

Georgia Institute of Technology.

Rowan University.

出版信息

Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media. 2025 Jun 7;19:1329-1345. doi: 10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35875.

DOI:10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35875
PMID:40842885
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12365693/
Abstract

Over one in five adults in the US lives with a mental illness. In the face of a shortage of mental health professionals and offline resources, online short-form video content has grown to serve as a crucial conduit for disseminating mental health help and resources. However, the ease of content creation and access also contributes to the spread of misinformation, posing risks to accurate diagnosis and treatment. Detecting and understanding engagement with such content is crucial to mitigating their harmful effects on public health. We perform the first quantitative study of the phenomenon using YouTube Shorts and Bitchute as the sites of study. We contribute MentalMisinfo, a novel labeled mental health misinformation (MHMisinfo) dataset of 739 videos (639 from Youtube and 100 from Bitchute) and 135372 comments in total, using an expert-driven annotation schema. We first found that few-shot in-context learning with large language models (LLMs) are effective in detecting MHMisinfo videos. Next, we discover distinct and potentially alarming linguistic patterns in how audiences engage with MHMisinfo videos through commentary on both video-sharing platforms. Across the two platforms, comments could exacerbate prevailing stigma with some groups showing heightened susceptibility to and alignment with MHMisinfo. We discuss technical and public health-driven adaptive solutions to tackling the "epidemic" of mental health misinformation online.

摘要

美国超过五分之一的成年人患有精神疾病。面对心理健康专业人员和线下资源短缺的情况,在线短视频内容已逐渐成为传播心理健康帮助和资源的重要渠道。然而,内容创作和获取的便捷性也导致了错误信息的传播,给准确诊断和治疗带来风险。检测和了解此类内容的参与情况对于减轻其对公众健康的有害影响至关重要。我们以YouTube Shorts和Bitchute为研究对象,对这一现象进行了首次定量研究。我们贡献了MentalMisinfo,这是一个新颖的带有标签的心理健康错误信息(MHMisinfo)数据集,共有739个视频(639个来自YouTube,100个来自Bitchute)和135372条评论,采用了专家驱动的注释模式。我们首先发现,使用大语言模型(LLMs)进行少样本上下文学习在检测MHMisinfo视频方面是有效的。接下来,我们通过对两个视频分享平台上的评论进行分析,发现了观众在参与MHMisinfo视频时独特且可能令人担忧的语言模式。在这两个平台上,评论可能会加剧普遍存在的污名化现象,一些群体对MHMisinfo表现出更高的易感性和认同感。我们讨论了从技术和公共卫生角度出发的适应性解决方案,以应对在线心理健康错误信息的“流行”问题。

相似文献

1
Supporters and Skeptics: LLM-based Analysis of Engagement with Mental Health (Mis)Information Content on Video-sharing Platforms.支持者与怀疑者:基于大语言模型对视频分享平台上心理健康(错误)信息内容的参与度分析
Proc Int AAAI Conf Weblogs Soc Media. 2025 Jun 7;19:1329-1345. doi: 10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35875.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
5
Factors that influence participation in physical activity for people with bipolar disorder: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.影响双相障碍患者参与体育活动的因素:定性证据的综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 4;6(6):CD013557. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013557.pub2.
6
Digital augmentation of aftercare for patients with anorexia nervosa: the TRIANGLE RCT and economic evaluation.神经性厌食症患者后期护理的数字化增强:TRIANGLE随机对照试验及经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(31):1-162. doi: 10.3310/ADLS3672.
7
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.
8
Quality and Dissemination of Uterine Fibroid Health Information on TikTok and Bilibili: Cross-Sectional Study.抖音和哔哩哔哩上子宫肌瘤健康信息的质量与传播:横断面研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 1;9:e75120. doi: 10.2196/75120.
9
Assessing inclusion and representativeness on digital platforms for health education: Evidence from YouTube.评估健康教育数字平台的包容性和代表性:来自 YouTube 的证据。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Sep;157:104669. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104669. Epub 2024 Jun 15.
10
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Mental health misinformation on social media: Review and future directions.社交媒体上的心理健康错误信息:综述与未来方向。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Apr;56:101738. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101738. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
2
Buffering against exposure to mental health misinformation in online communities on Facebook: the interplay of depression literacy and expert moderation.在 Facebook 在线社区中缓冲心理健康错误信息的暴露:抑郁素养和专家调解的相互作用。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Aug 18;23(1):1577. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16404-1.
3
Investigating COVID-19 Vaccine Communication and Misinformation on TikTok: Cross-sectional Study.调查TikTok上关于新冠病毒疫苗的传播及错误信息:横断面研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Oct 25;2(2):e38316. doi: 10.2196/38316. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
4
Deconstructing TikTok Videos on Mental Health: Cross-sectional, Descriptive Content Analysis.剖析TikTok上关于心理健康的视频:横断面描述性内容分析
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 19;6(5):e38340. doi: 10.2196/38340.
5
Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public.错误信息:易感性、传播以及让公众免疫的干预措施。
Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):460-467. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
6
Characteristics of Antivaccine Messages on Social Media: Systematic Review.社交媒体上反疫苗信息的特征:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 4;23(6):e24564. doi: 10.2196/24564.
7
Prevalence of Health Misinformation on Social Media: Systematic Review.社交媒体健康类错误信息的流行情况:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 20;23(1):e17187. doi: 10.2196/17187.
8
Methods in predictive techniques for mental health status on social media: a critical review.社交媒体上心理健康状况预测技术的方法:批判性综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Mar 24;3:43. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-0233-7. eCollection 2020.
9
A systematic review exploring how young people use online forums for support around mental health issues.一项系统综述,旨在探究年轻人如何利用在线论坛获取心理健康问题相关支持。
J Ment Health. 2019 Oct;28(5):566-576. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2019.1630725. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
10
Facebook language predicts depression in medical records.脸书的语言可预测病历中的抑郁症状。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Oct 30;115(44):11203-11208. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1802331115. Epub 2018 Oct 15.