• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估终末期肝病模型3.0评分在预测肝硬化急性静脉曲张出血患者死亡率中的预后价值。

EVALUATING THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF THE MELD 3.0 SCORE IN PREDICTING MORTALITY IN CIRRHOSIS PATIENTS WITH ACUTE VARICEAL BLEEDING.

作者信息

Que Nguyen Pham Tram, Vo Thong Duy

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

出版信息

Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000909.

DOI:10.14309/ctg.0000000000000909
PMID:40844517
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Acute variceal bleeding (AVB) is a severe complication of cirrhosis, with a 6-week mortality rate of up to 15-20%. Early risk prediction is essential for guiding management. MELD 3.0, a refined version of the original MELD score, incorporates additional variables (gender, sodium, albumin, capped creatinine) to improve short-term mortality prediction. This study assessed MELD 3.0's utility in predicting 6-week mortality in cirrhotic patients with AVB, in comparison with MELD, Glasgow-Blatchford Score (GBS), and AIMS65.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of cirrhotic patients with AVB admitted to Cho Ray Hospital (Nov 2023-May 2024) was studied. The primary outcome was 6-week mortality; in-hospital mortality was secondary. The predictive performance of MELD 3.0, MELD, GBS, and AIMS65 was evaluated using AUCROC.

RESULTS

Among 212 patients, in-hospital and 6-week mortality rates were 4.7% and 19.8%, respectively. For in-hospital mortality, MELD 3.0 showed the highest AUC (0.88), followed by MELD (0.80), AIMS65 (0.74), and GBS (0.59). For 6-week mortality, MELD 3.0 again outperformed others (AUC: 0.81), vs. MELD (0.75), AIMS65 (0.66), and GBS (0.61) (all p < 0.05). A MELD 3.0 cut-off ≥ 20 predicted >25% 6-week mortality (sensitivity 69.1%, specificity 83.5%).

CONCLUSION

MELD 3.0 is a strong predictor of early mortality in cirrhotic patients with AVB. A cut-off ≥ 20 may help identify high-risk patients requiring prompt intensive care.

摘要

引言

急性静脉曲张出血(AVB)是肝硬化的一种严重并发症,6周死亡率高达15%-20%。早期风险预测对于指导治疗至关重要。MELD 3.0是原始MELD评分的改进版本,纳入了额外变量(性别、钠、白蛋白、校正肌酐)以改善短期死亡率预测。本研究评估了MELD 3.0在预测肝硬化合并AVB患者6周死亡率方面的效用,并与MELD、格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分(GBS)和AIMS65进行比较。

方法

对2023年11月至2024年5月在朱莱医院收治的肝硬化合并AVB患者的前瞻性队列进行研究。主要结局是6周死亡率;住院死亡率为次要结局。使用AUCROC评估MELD 3.0、MELD、GBS和AIMS65的预测性能。

结果

212例患者中,住院死亡率和6周死亡率分别为4.7%和19.8%。对于住院死亡率,MELD 3.0的AUC最高(0.88),其次是MELD(0.80)、AIMS65(0.74)和GBS(0.59)。对于6周死亡率,MELD 3.0再次优于其他指标(AUC:0.81),而MELD为(0.75)、AIMS65为(0.66)、GBS为(0.61)(所有p<0.05)。MELD 3.0截断值≥20预测6周死亡率>25%(敏感性69.1%,特异性83.5%)。

结论

MELD 3.0是肝硬化合并AVB患者早期死亡率的有力预测指标。截断值≥20可能有助于识别需要立即重症监护的高危患者。

相似文献

1
EVALUATING THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF THE MELD 3.0 SCORE IN PREDICTING MORTALITY IN CIRRHOSIS PATIENTS WITH ACUTE VARICEAL BLEEDING.评估终末期肝病模型3.0评分在预测肝硬化急性静脉曲张出血患者死亡率中的预后价值。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000909.
2
Is There a Role for the Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Rebleeding and Mortality Risk Prediction in Acute Variceal Bleeding? A Comparative 5-Year Retrospective Study.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在急性静脉曲张出血再出血及死亡风险预测中是否有作用?一项为期5年的比较性回顾性研究。
Diseases. 2025 Aug 16;13(8):265. doi: 10.3390/diseases13080265.
3
Nonalcohol-related Cirrhosis Leads to Higher 6-week Mortality After Acute Variceal Bleeding Than Alcohol-related Cirrhosis.非酒精性肝硬化导致急性静脉曲张出血后6周死亡率高于酒精性肝硬化。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Sep;23(10):1776-1785.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.10.022. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
4
Comparison of the new risk score (ABL) with the Glasgow Blatchford Score, AIMS65, and pre-endoscopic Rockall Score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding admitted to the emergency department.急诊科收治的上消化道出血患者中,新风险评分(ABL)与格拉斯哥布莱奇福德评分、AIMS65评分及内镜前罗卡尔评分的比较。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 18;25(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01291-z.
5
Risk scoring systems to predict in-hospital mortality in patients with cirrhosis admitted with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.预测因急性上消化道出血入院的肝硬化患者院内死亡率的风险评分系统。
J Investig Med. 2025 Jun 30:10815589251357622. doi: 10.1177/10815589251357622.
6
Sina Score as a New Machine Learning-Derived Online Prediction Model of Mortality for Cirrhotic Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation: A Prospective Cohort Study.新浪评分作为一种新的基于机器学习的等待肝移植肝硬化患者死亡率在线预测模型:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 27;14(13):4559. doi: 10.3390/jcm14134559.
7
Prediction of 90-day mortality among cancer patients with unplanned hospitalisation: a retrospective validation study of three prognostic scores.癌症患者非计划性住院90天死亡率的预测:三种预后评分的回顾性验证研究
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 May 8;54:101317. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101317. eCollection 2025 Jul.
8
Different scoring systems to predict 6-week mortality in cirrhosis patients with acute variceal bleeding: a retrospective analysis of 202 patients.预测肝硬化急性静脉曲张出血患者6周死亡率的不同评分系统:对202例患者的回顾性分析
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jun-Jul;53(7):885-890. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2018.1481518. Epub 2018 Jun 17.
9
[Construction of a machine learning prognostic prediction model based on psoas muscle index for patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis].[基于腰大肌指数构建失代偿期肝硬化患者的机器学习预后预测模型]
Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2025 Jul 20;33(7):667-673. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20231123-00222.
10
Model for end-stage liver disease incorporating albumin score is associated with short- and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.纳入白蛋白评分的终末期肝病模型与急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者的短期和长期全因死亡率相关。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2025 Jul 3;14(6):342-350. doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf063.