Moll Friedrich H, Tammiksaar Erki, Padrini Giacomo, Halling Thorsten, Hansson Nils
Institut für Geschichte, Theorie und Ethik der Medizin, Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Curator Museum, Bibliothek und Archiv zur Geschichte der Urologie, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie e. V., Düsseldorf Berlin, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
Urologie. 2025 Sep;64(9):943-953. doi: 10.1007/s00120-025-02653-y. Epub 2025 Aug 22.
Doctoral dissertations in medicine provide precise insights into the state of knowledge and research methodology at a particular time. In contrast to more canonised textbook texts, dissertations often present scientific discourses and different views in a more detailed and therefore more comprehensible manner. This makes them relevant sources for tracing and analysing the development of the specialist field, but they are often not a focus of research into the history of science, partly due to insufficient documentation. In the context of a research project on dissertation culture in urology, this article uses the example of the Dorpat surgeon Georg Adelmann to analyse the embedding of an early dissertation on endourology in the contemporary research debate.
医学博士论文能让我们精准洞察特定时期的知识状况和研究方法。与那些更为经典的教科书文本不同,博士论文往往能以更详尽、因而也更易理解的方式呈现科学论述和不同观点。这使得它们成为追溯和分析该专业领域发展的重要资料来源,但由于文献记录不足,它们往往并非科学史研究的重点。在一项关于泌尿外科博士论文文化的研究项目背景下,本文以多尔帕特外科医生格奥尔格·阿德尔曼为例,分析一篇早期关于腔内泌尿外科的博士论文是如何融入当代研究辩论的。